Define "prosper" and "collapse"If you were to ISOT the classical Roman Empire at its territorial height (117 CE) to a virgin earth, would they prosper or collapse?
Atheist: "Aliens did it!" Heck, that's even canon in the Ring of Fire series.When thinking about modern day ISOTs a lot of stories tend to mostly ignore the psychological impact of the ISOT itself. There are some good examples out there but the majority of ISOTs goes straight to the juicy stuff like colonization, economics or warfare and ignores what the certainty that there is something supernatural would do to people. I suspect that intensely religious areas would actually cope with the psychological fallout better, at least initially. It might be easier to accept this as some form religious event while atheists and agnostics would probably really struggle with incorporating the ISOT into their larger world-view.
Sounds like a very interesting ISOT, but this I find very unlikely given the time frame and location you have it being discovered. I can see whatever people were living in the area having the Abyss take a centeral role in their religeon, but that won't have any more effect on the world at large than the Goddess Pele does.Also can see it's effects in theology, not only cause I can easily see the Abyss being seen as the entrance to Hell or something similar by Christians, but the development of a faith based around it like it happened in canon MiA could be possible. Certainly could complicate the already clusterfuck of religions that's going on at the time.
Sounds like a very interesting ISOT, but this I find very unlikely given the time frame and location you have it being discovered. I can see whatever people were living in the area having the Abyss take a centeral role in their religeon, but that won't have any more effect on the world at large than the Goddess Pele does.
If there are riches to be found there then no major religeous group will associate it with hell, not unless they believe they have no hope of gaining access to those riches (what cynical? me?), and European culture of the Early modern period would not IMO support forming a religeon based on a geographical feature, even one as impressive as you describe.
That's interesting, but
1)People are not likely to attribute that to supernatural reasons.
2)It will take a lot of time and study to find out this much, which makes it even less likely anyone will assume supernatural causes.
Because they were moving away from "anythng we don't understand is magic/supernatural" and towards "there's no such thing as magic". Added to that nothing in your description sounded anymore supernatural than seasickness, altitude sickness or radiation sickness.1) Why not? I'll admit early Modern Age ain't something I'm very knowledgeable about, but I don't think things like the Strain of Ascension and it's specificness could pinned down with shit scientifically known at the time.
And people in the 17th century (or for that matter 19th century) had no idea what caused Consumption (i.e Tuberculousis) or how to cure it, but that didn't make people assume it was a curse.Hell, the Steam/Diesel punkish society of Made In Abyss still hasn't figured it out yet beyond some select people
Because they were moving away from "anythng we don't understand is magic/supernatural" and towards "there's no such thing as magic". Added to that nothing in your description sounded anymore supernatural than seasickness, altitude sickness or radiation sickness.
And people in the 17th century (or for that matter 19th century) had no idea what caused Consumption (i.e Tuberculousis) or how to cure it, but that didn't make people assume it was a curse.
Then you've never dealt with someone really seasick
Sure, it's obvious it's something relating to the Abyss, but unless someone notes that prayer, or saints relic or something help prevent it I don't believe many people would attribute it to the supernatural as opposed to a natural phenomena they don't understand like altitude sickness or the bends, which I believe were known phenomena by this point.Jokes aside, sure, but the difference is that the Strain of Ascension is different in each layer in a very specific way AKA it's not the same depending on where you're ascending from, hell, depending on which part from the layer you're ascending, it can be better or worse. And the fact that it doesn't spread or that it stops after you stop ascending I feel would make it easy to determine as not being a disease like the plague or the flu
Some people? Sure. Just like cameraes and cars were, but most people, and especially most people in positions of power would not, and in 17th century europe, or colonies of european powers publicly claiming a religeous belief that the people in authority said was false is a good way to end up dead, or at least lose all your property.Maybe I was exaggerating a bit, but I still think the Abyss would easily be demonized by some people
Dude in the 16th-17th century, the best assumption people had for what caused disease, period, was either Miasma Theory or the Four Humours, and germ theory was out the window by way of "it hadn't been introduced yet, Also People Just Threw Their Shit Out A Window To Clean The Place Up", you are putting far more faith into a rationalist idea that didn't really exist at that time and probably wouldn't matter much in conjunction next to "The Giant Abyss That Looks Like A Yawning Void At Surface Level And Which Is Filled With Riches But Also Genuine Magic Curses". I'll grant you they would overlook initial steps, but if anyone got deeper and somehow survived, that shit would well and truly feared with all the force of God.a natural phenomena they don't understand like altitude sickness or the bends, which I believe were known phenomena by this point.
Yes, and they conducted scientific experiments to prove their theories. that's my point. They might not know why something happened, but they were not going to assume a supernatural reason, not without a pile of evidence to support it, or a political/material gain for claiming it.Dude in the 16th-17th century, the best assumption people had for what caused disease, period, was either Miasma Theory or the Four Humours,
Say what? You said it's 16th 17th century, the Renaissance is generally treated as starting in the 14th-15th century, by the 17th century we're talking about the Early Modern period, AFTER the Renaissance. Was there superstition? Definitely. Was it mostly treated as superstition? Also yes. While this period was rife with religious wars, witch hunts, etc... those had strong material and political reasons behind them, and their very nature tended to make people more cynical about claims of the supernatural.
If you like, but this is the thread for discussing ISOT ideas, so it seems to fit here just fine, at least until someone actaully starts writing it, and possibly for a bit afterwards as well.… Which is probably as much as should be said, because I feel like if this ISOT idea is pursued any further, then it'd be better to make it its own thread.
For some reason my mind gapped out and went, "Oh Yeah, The Renaissance. That was the 1700s". My apologies on that.Say what? You said it's 16th 17th century, the Renaissance is generally treated as starting in the 14th-15th century, by the 17th century we're talking about the Early Modern period, AFTER the Renaissance.
I'll grant you they would overlook initial steps, but if anyone got deeper and somehow survived, that shit would well and truly feared with all the force of God.
The fact that people can't come up witha rational explanation for X, does not mean the y'll assume it has a supernatural reason, and the more valuable the Abyss is, the more political pressure there'll be for the theologians and church leaders to conclude it had no connection to Hell and declare it completely mundane. That won't, of course stop local superstitions about it, but it will stop them from spreading.After all, find a rational explanation to the time dilatation or this
and the more valuable the Abyss is, the more political pressure there'll be for the theologians and church leaders to conclude it had no connection to Hell and declare it completely mundane
This would require them to:What I was thinking is that certain sects and branches withing Christianity would write the Abyss off as demonic, not the main Catholic Church or Protestant Movement.
Just the knowledge? With nothing else? I can't imagine it having much effect.Anyone ever contemplated an idea about ISOTing modern agronomical knowledge, and possibly plants, to ancient civilizations?
I assumed that advanced knowledge of soil nutrition and conservation would be a great improvement by themselves.Just the knowledge? With nothing else? I can't imagine it having much effect.
They instantly lose all the slaves and loot they gained from conquering. On the other hand, by 117 CE the Empire had more-or-less territorially stabilized, so that may not collapse it.If you were to ISOT the classical Roman Empire at its territorial height (117 CE) to a virgin earth, would they prosper or collapse?
And the civil war within the empire. The Romans were always their own worst enemies.Long-term, there are no barbarians to invade the Empire, though uncontrolled colonization of the empty lands around the Empire is going to create potential invaders sooner or later.
Not just their beliefs, the culture that formed in Polenesia did so because there were no dangerous animals to hunt or protect people from, and thus no hunter/warrior culture.
Who reaches it first isn't that important, who realizes it's worth fighting for first would matter some but colonies were traded back and forth multiple times (sometimes even peacefully) and the Abyss seems large enough to have multiple colonies around it from different nations (assuming none of them had enough force available to claim the entire area, however I think the discovery and eploitation of the Abyss would go in several stages:As for the Europeans, I think it would be a toss up between the Spanish and the Dutch for who reaches it first