Ooof. Many things being said and corrected. Lets summarize:

1) A larger black hole leaves you with lower tidal effects, mainly because you're further away from the center (at least while outside the event horizon).
On small scales, like the gravity drive, your head could be twice as far from the center as your toes, and thus your feet get (1/r^2) = 400% of the acceleration. At 15m it would be ~1%. (So with the drive idling such that you get 100g acceleration at the floor of the habitat, floating free in the cabin would still feel like hanging upside down by your feet because your head's only getting 99g acceleration) Active comfort features not included.
On large enough scales, like galactic cores, you can cross the event horizon without being torn apart, because you're still over 10 million km away from the singularity. That gives a ~00.0000000000000000001% difference in the pull head-to-toe. Throwing in a= C^2/2r, we get 4500000m/s^2, which smudges down to 0.0000000000045g difference if my math is correct.

2) People are much squishier than ship hulls. They aren't Kryptonians :)

3) You can treat things as point sources, not when they're big, but when they are more far away than they are big.
Being round simplifies things a bit via symmetry, and big things tend to force themselves to be round, but that doesn't apply everywhere.


When considering what happens if a ship loses power during a mission, I think it would go very similar to what happens if somebody's car breaks down on the way to an office party.
1) That one guy gets annoyed at his loose change and candy wrappers bouncing around everywhere.
2) His friends laugh at him for having a bad mechanic and let him sit in the back of their car.
3) They say, "thank goodness it wasn't the truck carrying the industrial BBQ equipment that broke down"
4) They phone for a tow truck to haul the junker off.

Any serious mission would have well maintained vehicles, but would still tend to be a cluster of smaller vehicles plus any larger specialist equipment with professionals driving it.
Except for planium research and disposal sites, everyone can commute very conveniently; even blinking back to Earth for lunch if they want, so there should be lots of redundancy in transportation options.
 
If that were the case then the ship itself would be torn apart by the tidal forces.
Only if the tidal forces exceed the tensile strength of the ship.

The gradient across the whole of the ship needs to be low enough not to cause undue stresses in the material.
Very true, however this is VERY different from "low enough not to produce a noticeable gravity gradient".

Thranx superalloys can survive far greater tidal forces than people can.
That's not surprising, even plain old steel or Iron does.
 
Thranx superalloys can survive far greater tidal forces than people can. It would be very easy for the tidal forces to be within tolerances for even simple steel while still being enough to kill a person, much less Thranx superalloys which are noted to be ridiculously strong.
Great! But do remember that a ship consists of more than a hull made of superalloys. It actually contains functional elements just as fragile as humans. A superalloy hull helps you very little if the gravity gradient across your pump bearings creates uneven loads, if your coolant valves have to cope with a change of gravity and with that a change of flow characteristic between one side of the valve to the other, if you can't rely on your lubricants to act the samebrom one end of a pipe to the other.
 
Great! But do remember that a ship consists of more than a hull made of superalloys. It actually contains functional elements just as fragile as humans. A superalloy hull helps you very little if the gravity gradient across your pump bearings creates uneven loads, if your coolant valves have to cope with a change of gravity and with that a change of flow characteristic between one side of the valve to the other, if you can't rely on your lubricants to act the samebrom one end of a pipe to the other.
That's why ship design that involves posigravity drive systems require some very stringent attention to details anywhere there are systems that can respond in a negative fashion to induced tidal effects. It won't be something that just anyone can dash off on a home CAD system and expect flawless performance out in the real world.
 
You are thinking too planetary. The gravity source is a point and thus you will feel the gravity more strongly closer to the point.
My kneejerk response was, "No, gravity sources are not point sources, it's just that we can usually get away with treating them as such."

Then I remembered we were talking about singularities, which are by definition point sources.

Carry on.
 
It actually contains functional elements just as fragile as humans.
Which ones?

superalloy hull helps you very little if the gravity gradient across your pump bearings creates uneven loads, if your coolant valves have to cope with a change of gravity and with that a change of flow characteristic between one side of the valve to the other, if you can't rely on your lubricants to act the samebrom one end of a pipe to the other.
except that the bearings and valves are very small and there's no reason for them to be anywhere near the singularity.
 
Em... People, we are talking about gravity manipulation here. I don't see anything that prevents humanx tech to work in a way gravy in Schlock Mercenary works, where annie plant, massive spherical reactors and source of gravity whose attendant equipment allows, for example, ship desks to be perpendicular to them.

So, would posigravity drives alone produce unfortunate effects? Yes. Are they alone? No, that would be insane.
 
No, they are NOT very small to do the job right at the posigrav projector, as close as any part of the ship can come to the singularity.
I suspect the projector itself will be as close to "solid state" as possible, and involve few if any moving parts that can be affected strongly by tidal shear. Plus, as the author has stated, gravity control is used to minimize tidal forces. As such, the shear inflicted will be, if not trivial, at least manageable.
 
It only goes wrong with a Mk 3 drive, due to minor design flaws that can in specific circumstances allow the singularity to wander before the safeties shut it off. That's bad, but survivable, as the crew of the Rylix found out the hard way.

Even then the ship was intact, it just bent it a little.
 
.... Personally, I would not be surprised if one day Lord Alamo ends up with a personal starship based on The Millennium Falcon.

There are, after all, far less practical iconic designs for him to be inspired by. Bonus points if he includes the two quad laser turrets, each with a quartet civilian grade gamma lasers. Having that level of firepower would be a very "Texan" thing to do. No offence to anyone from Real Texas; the Empire of Texas is another level from reality entirely...
I really want a spinoff/side-story from the perspective of that guy. Texas seceding from the Union and becoming its own superpower is something that's basically impossible but would be fun to read about.
 
.... Personally, I would not be surprised if one day Lord Alamo ends up with a personal starship based on The Millennium Falcon.

There are, after all, far less practical iconic designs for him to be inspired by. Bonus points if he includes the two quad laser turrets, each with a quartet civilian grade gamma lasers. Having that level of firepower would be a very "Texan" thing to do. No offence to anyone from Real Texas; the Empire of Texas is another level from reality entirely...
If he does this, I will tip my ten gallon hat to him and MPPi
 
I suspect the projector itself will be as close to "solid state" as possible, and involve few if any moving parts that can be affected strongly by tidal shear. Plus, as the author has stated, gravity control is used to minimize tidal forces. As such, the shear inflicted will be, if not trivial, at least manageable.
Then that same tech will moot any claim about effects on the human body being less than on the ship.
 
No, they are NOT very small to do the job right at the posigrav projector, as close as any part of the ship can come to the singularity.
Wrong. They are very small (at least relative to the ship's size), and there are none at the posigrav projector. What exactly do you imagine any mechanical parts would be doing in the projector?

Then that same tech will moot any claim about effects on the human body being less than on the ship.
How? The whole point of the design is that they can't have the artificial singularity near humans/Thrax or anything else vulnerable to intense gravity or radiation.
 
On another note, because the posigravity drive takes much of the forward arc, any direct fire offensive weapons systems would be located along the broadside of their ships. Unless they are mounted on stalks that extend past the singularity. That would look absolutely silly.
Actually, due to the known lensing effect of the singularity to the fore they could fire along calculated forward firing arcs that go around the forward dish and curve towards the target.
 
Actually, due to the known lensing effect of the singularity to the fore they could fire along calculated forward firing arcs that go around the forward dish and curve towards the target.
Not very well, though.
Normally, you've got 1 degree per degree to aim at.
With a gravitational singularity in front, most angles go into the hole, and you have to aim wide to bend your shots.
Targeting for the rest of the universe ahead of you is compressed into a ring around the singularity, so you have to aim VERY precisely, and your beams will get smeared out with much wider dispersion. And you're also firing 'uphill' against the singularity so you lose power as well.

For the other guy, there's a zone in the middle where the shots will fail to hit, but your ship will be a bigger than normal ring of a target around that, and all their shots will be blueshifted down towards you.
Not that that is enough to help the ME races win, when they're basically lobbing low speed spitballs, but it does give them the high ground and aim assist.
 
Not very well, though.
Normally, you've got 1 degree per degree to aim at.
With a gravitational singularity in front, most angles go into the hole, and you have to aim wide to bend your shots.
Targeting for the rest of the universe ahead of you is compressed into a ring around the singularity, so you have to aim VERY precisely, and your beams will get smeared out with much wider dispersion. And you're also firing 'uphill' against the singularity so you lose power as well.

For the other guy, there's a zone in the middle where the shots will fail to hit, but your ship will be a bigger than normal ring of a target around that, and all their shots will be blueshifted down towards you.
Not that that is enough to help the ME races win, when they're basically lobbing low speed spitballs, but it does give them the high ground and aim assist.

Actually, now that I think about it, why don't they just make a negagravity drive? then you could mount it on the back or... you could actually just put the guns facing backwards and shoot the other way around and either mount thrusters on the front to drive backward or just kite them with the posigravity drive. Hell, just using broadside weapons might work aswell. I feel like naval combat paradims may have poisoned our conception of space combat.
 
The thranx tried that at first, but all the ships would only fly backwards, which annoyed them. So they scrapped the idea and tried something else... ;)
 
The negativity drive they tried first was disliked by all. Including the drive itself. Whenever it was switched on, it generated a field of bad vibes.
 
Back
Top