Triggerhappy
Stick with Trigger and You'll Make it Through
- Location
- SoCal
So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
I figured I'd answer to this one in particular to show how these things aren't always as they seem. For instance in this case making a light bulb last a 100 years is indeed quite possible. The reason they don't make them like that, is because it turns out they are fantastically inefficient then. (Basically you need to use a substantially thicker wire for this, and this effects the amount of power you need to make it glow) So much so, that making a new light bulb every now and then turns out to be cheaper.spaceman1997 said:Remember Edison's lightbulb? It had an estimated lifetime of over 100 years.
Use fire magic instead of coal?Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
Basically, they were just a room full of scribes. Many heads, both Fae and Tristanian bent over desks scribbling notations and figures down on paper, seemingly oblivious to the goings on around them.APL 123AZ said:Assistants pending...
Lab still under construction (Given that cackle we might want to double up on the protective charms - Argo)
In this fic she calls herself "a triangle of water"Vaermina said:
True so very true but it would mitigate the negative aspects. Plus you must remember all those Fairy fire magesNecroMechanoid said:What's the full list of nightmare. Besides the pollution.
They'd probably charge high-rates.
In the future, Water Magic will be used in more ways than ever imagined.Anzer'ke said:The Fae doctors are going to have plenty of fun introducing microbiology and so on though.
A good start would be for the companies doing the industrializing to be democratically managed by their workers, which would prevent most of the worst abuses. Then safety and environmental regulations, a welfare state, and if the workplace democracy doesn't cover it then a minimum wage.Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
Ultimately the problem comes down to:Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
The simple consideration of the human factor instead of just outright seeing humans as cogs of machinery would help a fair bit, I suspect.Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
And this is going to happen how? Companies today see workers as cogs.biigoh said:The simple consideration of the human factor instead of just outright seeing humans as cogs of machinery would help a fair bit, I suspect.
...Not really sure how that fixes anything much. Or is particularly practical. I guess you reduce mining but the fire has to burn something, I'd wager that burning without fuel takes a lot of willpower. As for firestones those are rare enough or non-elves that Joseph only got given 3-5 of them and it was a big deal.Sinsystems said:
Firstly Citation please.Quickshot0 said:I figured I'd answer to this one in particular to show how these things aren't always as they seem. For instance in this case making a light bulb last a 100 years is indeed quite possible. The reason they don't make them like that, is because it turns out they are fantastically inefficient then. (Basically you need to use a substantially thicker wire for this, and this effects the amount of power you need to make it glow) So much so, that making a new light bulb every now and then turns out to be cheaper.
And thus light bulbs burn out. For other lighting technologies like say LED lighting, these things work out substantially different, thus why LED lights last much longer. (Assuming one doesn't have a crappy build)
Well first off we'd need to list the problems, I'll give it a shot but it's unlikely I'll get it right and certainly it'll be faaaar from conclusive.Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
You.Aranfan said:A good start would be for the companies doing the industrializing to be democratically managed by their workers, which would prevent most of the worst abuses. Then safety and environmental regulations, a welfare state, and if the workplace democracy doesn't cover it then a minimum wage.
Worker management does seem the best solution if far from a complete one, though ironically in avoiding mentioning it as it felt controversial I ended up making a more ideologically charged post.Aranfan said:And this is going to happen how? Companies today see workers as cogs.
Well this article does cover a fair bit about it and Sakuya is a history expert so she should at least know the highlights.NecroMechanoid said:
Which is part of the problem. The human factor was one of those things that I believe wasn't a consideration.Aranfan said:And this is going to happen how? Companies today see workers as cogs.
Actually, it is your fault. The technology of the time produced a a spinning machine that would have and did allow artisan textile manufactures (think like Rarity from FiM) to compete with the big factories. The factory owners used their money to outlaw that machine.biigoh said:And really, it's not MY fault that the hand-weaving weavers can't keep up with my mass production factories, why should I care that they're out of work. I suppose I should care because they can work for me now. So they can have some money doing things better, my way.
What I'm trying to say that an eye and CONSIDERATION for the human factor instead of only an eye for profit and efficiency will help lower some if not a fair bit of the issues with the industrial revolution.Aranfan said:Actually, it is your fault. The technology of the time produced a a spinning machine that would have and did allow artisan textile manufactures (think like Rarity from FiM) to compete with the big factories. The factory owners used their money to outlaw that machine.
And while you describe the mindset well enough, you aren't proposing a way to mitigate or prevent it. I propose again: Workplace Democracy. If it's good enough for our political organizations why not for our economic ones?
It is an easy mindset to slip into. How do you propose to keep people at the top from slipping into said mindset? Just saying it's bad, and why it's bad, isn't going to help prevent it. There needs to be mechanisms and structures set up to discourage the mindset, or it will keep coming back.biigoh said:What I'm trying to say that an eye and CONSIDERATION for the human factor instead of only an eye for profit and efficiency will help lower some if not a fair bit of the issues with the industrial revolution.
That mindset is what caused all kins of problems with the industrial revolution, because it's an easy mindset to slip into. Expediency and Efficiency; fuck the competitors, fuck the workers, fuck the customers if they don't buy your goods and only yours.
Unrestrained capitalism as noted above is a serious problem.
Democracy isn't really going to help, due to the fact that you will get cliques and "old boys" network forming up with "vote blocs" and "parties" that want to go a certain way such as can be seen in just about any modern political system. And no, I'm not pointing fingers at the American United States government/political system, it's not JUST that one.Aranfan said:It is an easy mindset to slip into. How do you propose to keep people at the top from slipping into said mindset? Just saying it's bad, and why it's bad, isn't going to help prevent it. There needs to be mechanisms and structures set up to discourage the mindset, or it will keep coming back.
Worker control of factories is a pretty good starting point, not to mention that it increases the drive for people to enter the cities and work, thus bypassing the need for more negative methods of getting those workers (imposition of bizarre "work ethic" among them, human beings should not be made to believe in working constantly at menial crap as if it was a good thing in and of itself) involved.Aranfan said:It is an easy mindset to slip into. How do you propose to keep people at the top from slipping into said mindset? Just saying it's bad, and why it's bad, isn't going to help prevent it. There needs to be mechanisms and structures set up to discourage the mindset, or it will keep coming back.
I knew it was a way that was counter intuitive to how a rapier was supposed to be wielded, but thanks for the correction.zer0light said:from what i've read in the LN and seen in the anime, she's more into multiple rapid stabs.
Build the factories, foundries, and chemical plants a long ways away from where they live maybe in the Salamander desert zone. Should be simple since unlike modern day humans the Fae can fly to work.Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?
You mean the companies all owned by the nobles?Aranfan said:A good start would be for the companies doing the industrializing to be democratically managed by their workers, which would prevent most of the worst abuses.
Something you forgot to mention is that the only land owners are the nobles. Which is going to cause no end of problems for the Fae if they try to create any workers rights since it could be the old company towns problem all over again.Anzer'ke said:-The effect on people is a negative one. The need for workers requires bringing them in from the countryside into cities, then they are exploited to the max to fuel the industry. Awful hours, no safety, few holidays if any, all of these things being steps down from the previous. Communities get broken up and often don't reform. Housing becomes a dire situation with people living crammed into tiny spaces. Cue dickensian dystopia.
I'm honestly not sure how to deal with this. Maintaining current hours and holidays, beating safety standards and so forth in ahead of time, forcing the housing to develop in a healthy (not to mention more aesthetic) manner, all of this would seem a solution (given that the Fae naturally will be thinking much longer term than humans this kind of thing does make sense) however it's an extremely blunt method and the nobles are hardly far off the mindset of workers being disposable tools to exploit break and discard.
Nothing wrong with parties, but why would parties make a worker-managed firm treat their workers like shit?biigoh said:Democracy isn't really going to help, due to the fact that you will get cliques and "old boys" network forming up with "vote blocs" and "parties" that want to go a certain way such as can be seen in just about any modern political system. And no, I'm not pointing fingers at the American United States government/political system, it's not JUST that one.
Good luck doing that with the weak central government of fuedalism. Hell, good luck doing that with the upper class dominated modern centralized state.biigoh said:What needs to be done is to give INCENTIVES, to make it worth going green. Carrots as it were for the industry. With the stick of penalties and such for failing audits as the back up. Because if there's only punishment, the incentive then becomes how well can you hide going against the regulations. In short, rewards for following regulations and or above it. AND a punishment system for NOT following it.
Settlements spring up around factories and places of work, your proposal doesn't really help. How do you think the big industrial cities got started?Vaermina said:Build the factories, foundries, and chemical plants a long ways away from where they live maybe in the Salamander desert zone. Should be simple since unlike modern day humans the Fae can fly to work.
Why the hell would the nobles be owning the companies that the fae are starting?Vaermina said:
Except for the land that the Fae own collectively. Remember the treaty?Vaermina said:Something you forgot to mention is that the only land owners are the nobles. Which is going to cause no end of problems for the Fae if they try to create any workers rights since it could be the old company towns problem all over again.
Can you be more specific about the issues you're trying to address and their relevance to the story?Triggerhappy said:So anyone care to explain how we can avoid or mitigate the nightmare of the industrial revolution this time around?