Good, good...
Good, good...
Is Circe a goddess in DC comics?
Technically no but with all her magic she could come across as the literal god of magic to humans.
Nah, I was wrong, Homer calls her a goddess, and since she has exclusively divine blood (Helios with an Oceanid), she is pretty much non human.Technically no but with all her magic she could come across as the literal god of magic to humans.
In myth, but DC Circe was a sorceress queen. I guess the movies can pick whichever one they want if they include her though.Nah, I was wrong, Homer calls her a goddess, and since she has exclusively divine blood (Helios with an Oceanid), she is pretty much non human.
I was thinking about the movie again and I had an idea; it's probably not true / reading between the lines, but here is my new headcanon:
Steve Trevor was married - possibly estranged. His wife's name? Barbara Ann Trevor nee Minerva. A frail housewife stuck on the homefront that finds out that her husband died and shacked up with some super powerful Amazonian woman. Feeling powerless at the idea, she seeks the help of the Greek God Circe, who gives her the power of the Cheetah so that she can get revenge on the woman who stole her husband.
The powers happen to make her immortal like WW as well, so she could show up in a modern day sequel, perhaps teamed with the Duke of Deception (whom I would like to be played by Chris Pine - the Duke takes on Trevor's form to torment Diana).
In other news, I've discovered the Wonderbat ship.
Where were you when Justice League was on TV?
She's still too powerful to have sex with a man 1/100 her strength, and her having sex with a person much weaker than her only ruins the SOD. Especially if they are male.
That's a rather...interesting headcanon. Ignoring for a second that she's able to control her strength that she's shouldn't have a problem with it I find the "especially if they are male" part particularly confusing for a number of reasons.She's still too powerful to have sex with a man 1/100 her strength, and her having sex with a person much weaker than her only ruins the SOD. Especially if they are male.
That's a rather...interesting headcanon. Ignoring for a second that she's able to control her strength that she's shouldn't have a problem with it I find the "especially if they are male" part particularly confusing for a number of reasons.
...Ok Ignoring for a second penetration is not a requirement for pleasure I don't see how physical weakness matters at all.Wonder Woman getting penetrated by a weaker man isn't exactly appealing, as opposed to Superman or a person closer to her strength level. It makes no sense to me.
Edit 2: Just noticed this conversation was put to rest pages later, had page 12 on tab for weeks. But I will keep this message for sake of history.
If anyone wants to continue conversation, PM me.
It's one thing to encourage women to a private event. It's another to go out of your way to bar a certain gender from attending a public place. It's illegal.
Edit:
That's perfectly fine, Q, but we are not dealing with this situation.
Alamo Drafthouse is a theatre that could be subject to discrimination lawsuits if they found denying service to people of a certain group.
Not to mention they had this to say:
Denying service to a certain gender for these guys violates the US constitution. And it makes it more blatant in your intent to go about this via social media.
Here is an example that would be perfectly legal:
Ariana Grande decides to host a private screening of WW at her house with all women. That's perfectly legal.
And that's legal too. But WW is not an organization.
I think you could pull it off. Maybe she spends the next decade and some change looking for the God killer knife before she gets her powers. Then you could portray her as a kind of Indiana Jones type prior to getting abilities.The problem with that is it doesn't leave Minerva in her role as Evil Lara Croft.
I'll agree to that. There were times where it definitely worked, and times where it felt like they were stalling to meet their full timeslot.
*TaylerHoward Taylor's response was basically, well, that justified the money I spent on the prior DCEU movies.
Here's something I don't understand. The movie wants moral complexity of some kind but then, why choose WW1? It's never been a subject of great interest to me but I thought the tragedy of the whole thing was because it was a giant clusterfuck of alliances and people in charge and then all the little folks got dragged into it.
The movie wants to juxtapose Wonder Woman's idealism with more realism. Killing Ares won't solve everything because People Are Bad All On Their Own. But this is provably false here. The Real Life Ares that caused WW1 are entirely to blame.
World War 1 is not a case of...I dunno what to call it. Grassroots activism is the positive so I guess call it grassroots violence. The kind of racial, ethnic, religious and class tensions that exist everywhere but are more obvious since the end of the Cold War. If the moral of the story is that people can be good and bad, maybe look at the people? WW1 is a story of people being puppeted around by what might as well be gods of war. If you want to highlight the banality of evil, maybe set it during a conflict that involves average folks being awful instead of average folks being sent off to fight and die for some aristocrats who, if they were removed, would have solved a lot of problems.
Well Wonder Woman first showed up in World War 2, but they didn't do that for multiple reasons. One being it'd make the TFA comparisons even more obvious and two WW2 is a pretty romantic conflict. The Nazis Are Bad. The Not-Nazis Are Good. "Kill them all, Diana!" "Okay!" *buzzsaw noises* *credits*. Any possible moral ambiguity contained, such as the horrible treaty conditions leaving Germany an utter wreck stewing in its own bitterness, are immediately thrown into the ovens with the six million people getting murdered for their religion/ethnicity/both for basically no reason when you get right down to it.Here's something I don't understand. The movie wants moral complexity of some kind but then, why choose WW1? It's never been a subject of great interest to me but I thought the tragedy of the whole thing was because it was a giant clusterfuck of alliances and people in charge and then all the little folks got dragged into it.
The movie wants to juxtapose Wonder Woman's idealism with more realism. Killing Ares won't solve everything because People Are Bad All On Their Own. But this is provably false here. The Real Life Ares that caused WW1 are entirely to blame.
World War 1 is not a case of...I dunno what to call it. Grassroots activism is the positive so I guess call it grassroots violence. The kind of racial, ethnic, religious and class tensions that exist everywhere but are more obvious since the end of the Cold War. If the moral of the story is that people can be good and bad, maybe look at the people? WW1 is a story of people being puppeted around by what might as well be gods of war. If you want to highlight the banality of evil, maybe set it during a conflict that involves average folks being awful instead of average folks being sent off to fight and die for some aristocrats who, if they were removed, would have solved a lot of problems.
The general population of the various powers weren't exactly shy about going to war. France in particular was very eager to avenge the humiliating defeat of the Franco-Prussian war, and Germany wasn't exactly shy about the war either. The war became steadily more unpopular (but also something that no one could really disengage from).Here's something I don't understand. The movie wants moral complexity of some kind but then, why choose WW1? It's never been a subject of great interest to me but I thought the tragedy of the whole thing was because it was a giant clusterfuck of alliances and people in charge and then all the little folks got dragged into it.
The movie wants to juxtapose Wonder Woman's idealism with more realism. Killing Ares won't solve everything because People Are Bad All On Their Own. But this is provably false here. The Real Life Ares that caused WW1 are entirely to blame.
World War 1 is not a case of...I dunno what to call it. Grassroots activism is the positive so I guess call it grassroots violence. The kind of racial, ethnic, religious and class tensions that exist everywhere but are more obvious since the end of the Cold War. If the moral of the story is that people can be good and bad, maybe look at the people? WW1 is a story of people being puppeted around by what might as well be gods of war. If you want to highlight the banality of evil, maybe set it during a conflict that involves average folks being awful instead of average folks being sent off to fight and die for some aristocrats who, if they were removed, would have solved a lot of problems.
I think not actually covering WW2 would be a good idea. Because she'll either do less than she should, or do as much as she should and frankly that can be a bit questionable to do in a superhero movie either way.