@Sayle would we still get taxes from the Blue Mountain settlement?
You would, yes.
@Sayle would we still get taxes from the Blue Mountain settlement?
Another question: Can we still trade if all our mercantile districts are depopulated/empty?
[X] If the boy was not adopted, it is murder.
Unless it was officially recognised as adoption it's murder.
[X] Send two population to settle the Blue Mountains (-14 Gold, +3 Stone, Pasture/Quarry/Housing)
It's time to expand our dominion!
[X] Tame the Baranduin (-10 Gold, -20 Stone)
Technically the cost is 24 gold, but by the next turn we should have that much right?
Concerning the Wall: I think the QM stopped the auto-turns before the building queue reached the Inner Wall due to the immigration event.
Concerning the Docks: We already have docks, we just need the population to fill/work in them.
The unfortune that it to happens this way. If say, the death was accidental and unrelated to the kid and the question now is whether or not unadopted kid should receive inheritance right, the situation would have different implication.We are already playing the Etruscan card for our sorta Romans with the marrying the women of our foes... after we past these said foes. not seeing anything wrong with this this... is going to put us, morally, in a very strange place.
Got an insightful rating from the QM on that post, so I guess that counts as my interpretation of events being correct.We'd need a clarification for the first, which is why I'd like both the winning vote and any note about things done/not done
Regarding the other, I think it is more about building more docks (note the +1 to shipbuilding) so maybe it is about adding a drydock?. we'd need to man our current docks first, though, so not a big priority
That's not what that means. A QM rating a post means that they appreciate what you had to say on some level, it does not mean the assumptions made in the post they rated is correct. If Sayle wanted people to let people know that someone's statements were correct, he'd just say so.Got an insightful rating from the QM on that post, so I guess that counts as my interpretation of events being correct.
Got an insightful rating from the QM on that post, so I guess that counts as my interpretation of events being correct.
I agree though that knowing exactly what the winning vote was would be useful.
That's not what that means. A QM rating a post means that they appreciate what you had to say on some level, it does not mean the assumptions made in the post they rated is correct. If Sayle wanted people to let people know that someone's statements were correct, he'd just say so.
(This isn't a snipe at you, just making sure people don't start making assumptions based off ratings rather than statements of intent)
For further details on the case:
The boy in question was about eight years old when his father was killed and both he and his mother were integrated into the population. Andreth then took both the mother and son into his house, though he not marry her or give them his family name. The woman has borne him no children, and given her recalcitrance it's difficult to establish if they ever actually slept together or not. The boy has a history of being surly and disrespectful, and has only learned enough Sindarin to be understood, which is little compared to other children taken from Eryn Vorn. There was an altercation the day of the murder that the mother will not be drawn on, only that they were arguing, and the boy stabbed Andreth later in the evening while meals were being prepared. He then attempted to flee but was caught by the guard. At the time of the murder, the boy is eleven years old.
The law courts have already decided on the death penalty for obvious reasons, but are primarily tied up on if it is patricide when the boy was essentially being fathered by Andreth (despite the boy's stubborness) for a number of years, and there is a general sense among the Dunedain population that the killing was more heinous than murder, but there is more division as to whether it is so far as patricide.
There has been an uptick in the number of marriages between Wild-women and Dunedain since the event, primarily among those who already consider the children they have fostered their own.
PS: The building stopped with the population tick, just before the walls were scheduled to be built.
Sems more like he took them in but was respecting that she likely wasn't comfortable with becoming more involved with him. They didn't marry, which likely has some effect on whether they slept together or not, and would also be why the kid didn't get the family name; if he hasn't married the kid's mother then he wouldn't get it unless he was adopted, and adopting the kid would be a very strange and likely questionable act in such a situation, possibly being seen as trying to take the child from her.Andreth taking in both of them and yet not trying to woo the woman... something here is off...
Sems more like he took them in but was respecting that she likely wasn't comfortable with becoming more involved with him. They didn't marry, which likely has some effect on whether they slept together or not, and would also be why the kid didn't get the family name; if he hasn't married the kid's mother then he wouldn't get it unless he was adopted, and adopting the kid would be a very strange and likely questionable act in such a situation, possibly being seen as trying to take the child from her.
It also could be that the mother slept with the victim and the child found out about it(or finally got to a breaking point) and confronted the victim thus the argument and why the mother refuses to talk since she doesn't want to be looked down upon by others.Sems more like he took them in but was respecting that she likely wasn't comfortable with becoming more involved with him. They didn't marry, which likely has some effect on whether they slept together or not, and would also be why the kid didn't get the family name; if he hasn't married the kid's mother then he wouldn't get it unless he was adopted, and adopting the kid would be a very strange and likely questionable act in such a situation, possibly being seen as trying to take the child from her.
DOH!We don't need to play a game of CluedoTM to work out the murder motive here, you know?
To nip this walls argument in the bud (too late), it's the one everybody voted for, and it doesn't need to have only one gate. It's just the style you're using, and it produces stronger but less granular defenses than a district by district honeycomb structure. That's all.
Serves me right for making arguments when I should be asleep.
The rest does hold true I think.
*checks*
And the GM has weighed in. Time to go take out the trash.
What happened?Knight's Quest, so I've still got a fair amount of Quester PTSD left over.
Old school Sierra Graphical adventure series of games, you could die... a lot... in a lot of ways because you didn't do a few things ages ago.
Old school Sierra Graphical adventure series of games, you could die... a lot... in a lot of ways because you didn't do a few things ages ago.
DOH!
EDIT: err, I don't think that's material regardless. There's may be clemency that can be given, depending the situation. But the question is whether or not the killing is patricide, not about the merited punishment.
Actually referring to a different thing. I could best sum it up in this comic. Props for excellent knowledge of gaming history however.
My though was that we could get some insight into what his home life was like, and whether he should really be considered the victim's son, as well as insight for our ruling. But if you'd prefer to keep it to just providing insight for our ruling, we could just go for this add-on:
[X] Official or not, this is a patricide.
--[X] Have the boy brought before us, and ask him to give his account of events. Look into his mind as he does, and use this to inform our ruling, if any clemency should be given for one so young.
If that's more preferable to people.