We can delegate that.We still need stewardship, and being better at construction and generating money has obvious military applications. Basically, not putting all our eggs in one basket.
If you read the quote that you were providing to justify intrigue as a choice, it says that intrigue is *one* way around the problems with low authority. That's context dependent. If you look to the situation of writing the letter, it's hard to see how intrigue would be providing the major benefit over the diplomacy skill since it's open, clear communications relaying what we expect and attempting to convince our subjects that those desires should also be theirs. Eurydice's diplomacy stat is large enough that I think that has a pretty clear chance of success here despite the low authority (low authority or not, a letter from the child Pharoah is not nothing), and aside from that it's not the best of times to get uppity with the monarch when the sovereign's army is rolling directly their way.Also, this. I get you guys want to superlevel Diplomacy, but resolving disputes successfully as a kid draws on our (low) authority as a monarch. Intrigue helps there. And Intrigue as our major is still breaking new ground for a CK2 style quest; mostly SV goes for Diplo or Martial or Piety.
Skill is acquired through practice, not through handing off the task at hand to more experienced persons. We can't exactly take charge of the army now without that causing a disaster, absolutely, but I fail to see why sending letters to our vessels regarding our expectations for logistics would leave us less knowledgeable regarding logistics than in the case of shoving it all off on the general.It's sounding like our first issues upon taking the throne are going to be military, and martial is still our worst stat. We should try to become skilled enough at strategy to be able to delegate properly to the people more skilled than us. Martial + Stewardship hopefully equals logistics and strategy, which is pretty important in our sort of warfare. Hard to keep the troops fighting without water in a desert after all.
Yeah. But it is a way forward, and I like that way forward.If you read the quote that you were providing to justify intrigue as a choice, it says that intrigue is *one* way around the problems with low authority. That's context dependent. If you look to the situation of writing the letter, it's hard to see how intrigue would be providing the major benefit over the diplomacy skill since it's open, clear communications relaying what we expect and attempting to convince our subjects that those desires should also be theirs. Eurydice's diplomacy stat is large enough that I think that has a pretty clear chance of success here despite the low authority (low authority or not, a letter from the child Pharoah is not nothing), and aside from that it's not the best of times to get uppity with the monarch when the sovereign's army is rolling directly their way.
No, tought that is one of the primary reasons, the other being the innate utility we get from the rites, and also a bunch of secondary things and half formed ideas.
How exactyl does a one poin diference equals to heavy suboptimal again ?Learning is a legit way of doing magic. We have better learning than Piety. Hence, Learning > Piety for magical purposes.
Yeah. We need intrigue for one of those primary reasons, then. Not Piety.No, tought that is one of the primary reasons, the other being the innate utility we get from the rites, and also a bunch of secondary things and half formed ideas.
Not heavily suboptimal, but I would prefer to learn from our mom rather than a priest. And one point is at least somewhat significant. And Piety doesn't really appeal to me personally.How exactyl does a one poin diference equals to heavy suboptimal again ?
Not Piety.
And those rites mostly help us at flood times. Due to our father's work, we already have an advantage on flood rolls.
Us screwing them up to that level that there is game over likely requires a critfail, which we chose the bonus on flood rolls to avoid.You do realize that screwing up the rites was grounds to sacrifice the pharoah?
Don't underestimate their importance. The nation feasts or starves on them
First, Piety was stated to help a lot with that, secondly you missed how ritual can boost rolls, so they help with pretty much everythig, lastly, I don't see where you got that we need intrigue for that, if we plan to bring people to our side the other stat we would need is diplomacy wich seensto be currently our highest score so we got that covered.Yeah. We need intrigue for one of those primary reasons, then. Not Piety.
And those rites mostly help us at flood times. Due to our father's work, we already have an advantage on flood rolls.
First, Piety was stated to help a lot with that, secondly you missed how ritual can boost rolls, so they help with pretty much everythig, lastly, I don't see where you got that we need intrigue for that, if we plan to bring people to our side the other stat we would need is diplomacy wich seensto be currently our highest score so we got that covered.
But high Piety isn't going to coopt the Priesthood by itself, and the opportunity cost of getting it and taking the sort of traits needed for high Piety may interfere with other avenues and in particular with Intrigue. Though that said there are a lot of Piety actions you can't delegate to other people (which is how most Actions are executed) simply because of the nature of the ritual and status requirements.
Piety is not the Diplomacy stat for Priests. Priests in Kemet (as in Ancient Egypt) are employees of the State and in theory the temples are government institutions that carry out rites on behalf of the population. In practice they form a powerful block of resources and political power and need to be dealt with by politics; either by reducing their influence and firmly subordinating them to the ruler, or by coopting them to support the ruler voluntarily. The religion of Kemet is also not exactly that of Medieval Europe and so has a different take on what sin is and what sins are.
First, I know that, it is part of what I was speaking about.He said we could deal with the Priesthood politically as well. And High piety explicitly does not co-opt the priesthood and is stated to interfere with intrigue actions.
And you got this Idea from where again ? Because not only we don't know anything about said learning bsed magic but what we know indicates it is very range limited.Meanwhile, any sort of boosts to rolls we want we can get from Learning based magic instead of Piety based magic.
You know I can accept the first part of this, but the second isplain false, we have straigh up more actual reasons to raise Piety than Martial, unless instead of talking about this character you are talking about the character you want this one to be ?Diplomacy can help with bringing people to our side, but I don't want Piety to be a major thing. It can live with an average rating. There is no real reason to invest into piety here, not for this character.
Uh, no?First, I know that, it is part of what I was speaking about.
Secondly, Piety was stated to not co-opt them by itself, important keyword there so it would at least help, like I said.
Third, the interference with intrigue was stated more as a possibilitie than an absolute, in the same vein you could say Martial may screw our intrigue (remenber the reckless trait?)
Overall you may need to work more on you reading comprension.
And you got this Idea from where again ? Because not only we don't know anything about said learning bsed magic but what we know indicates it is very range limited.
You know I can accept the first part of this, but the second isplain false, we have straigh up more actual reasons to raise Piety than Martial, unless instead of talking about this character you are talking about the character you want this one to be ?
Give me a quote from the GM that says that learning based magic is at a severe disadvantage against piety magic.And you got this Idea from where again ? Because not only we don't know anything about said learning bsed magic but what we know indicates it is very range limited
Well, ignoring your projected personal bias(because untimately she (and also us) has as much reason to believer prayer or study can help), ultimately we have more reason to reaise piety than matial because diferent form the former the later isn't realy expected from us and can be delegated. So yes Martial is less important to raise due to how unlikely not being able to delegate that would be.Uh, no?
We have every reason to raise Martial. We just talked to our main advisors about the fact that our vassals are rebellious and are just being informed of an important campaign.
We know that as a ruler, we will be expected to deal with this shit. Why is it not in character for Eurydice, who was established as having somewhat of a direct approach to problem resolution, to study war instead of sending prayers that she iisn't sure will do anything?
Like the option as it is for Piety is that Eurydice decides to pray to Gods who may or may not intervene, over studying a set of methods that are guaranteed to help against armed rebellion.
First, stop making assumptionand work on your reading compreension, because this is already getting ridiculous, seriously try to grasp a bit better how the diferent doctrines work.Give me a quote from the GM that says that learning based magic is at a severe disadvantage against piety magic.
Because you know, a learning based user is the Royal Magician of Kemet. If the style is so pathetic, then our dad would have appointed a local piety based caster, who would have been easier to get.
I can restore a form to what it is supposed to be. It is hard to do so for others, but it can be done.
Your Mother placed her hands upon his head again. At first it seemed that nothing was happening. But Bakenptah began to stir after a few moments, while your Mother seemed to sweat. Even you noticed the room getting warmer. Eventually, she stepped back with an effort as Bakenptah's eyes opened wide.
Here we can see the relevant parts from when mother healed our friend, obviously her magic is gueled by her own reserves, but there is also the statement of how it is harder to heal other, also of note is how tiring the act is to her and how she needs to touch his head, based on that I assume there are range limitations to not even talk about the energy ones.Your Mother seems very tired when you get back to the palace and hands you off to Ptahshepses at the entrance of the palace.
And here we have the explanation about the basis o piety magic, wich involves rituals to attain godly blessings, wich won't suffer from the limitations of the body due to their nature.The most basic sort of priestly "magic" is to obtain blessings from the gods for a given endeavor, which translates to a mechanical bonus on a roll.
Man, you have your own bias too here. Stop calling out my statements as biased; it's not like yours aaren'.aren't.Well, ignoring your projected personal bias(because untimately she (and also us) has as much reason to believer prayer or study can help), ultimately we have more reason to reaise piety than matial because diferent form the former the later isn't realy expected from us and can be delegated. So yes Martial is less important to raise due to how unlikely not being able to delegate that would be.
In the interest of clarifying this :
@Cavalier , can projects using Stewardship like the Ptah one our dad did give similar mechanical boni to Piety rituals?