Batman vs. Superman: Killing and Expectations

Honestly, the main reason MOSman doesn't work as a Jesus metaphor is that Jesus was more than just crucifixes and being the son of God. I say this as an atheist who roomed with a guy in a religious studies class, but Jesus was a fascinating person. He was an outspoken rebel who constantly preached his message, helped and lived among the sick and poor, and defied the government whenever possible. One time, he met a guy who was possessed and treated like a pariah, and exorcised hundreds of demons from him, and when the guy asked him if there was anything he could do, Jesus just told him to spread the word.
I could go on, but my point is that Jesus was a guy who had a very specific message and constantly spoke out about it. MOSman has no real message and never really speaks out about anything - best shown by the fact that, when he works in news, he does the sports beat.

His dad taught him to hide and I think that informs a lot of his personality.
 
This is, I suppose, neither here nor there but it kind of is because I made this thread dammit.

It is an interesting fact to me that comic book writers who people tend to associate with cynicism or grittiness really like Superman. People like Frank Miller or Garth Ennis, the latter especially because his hatred for capes is well-known. Alan Moore also likes Superman, although he's a bit different from those other two.

I wonder what it is about the world's biggest boy scout that melts the heart of everyone.
 
Dr. Manhattan exists to question what if our godly protector couldn't care less about us. All of Watchmen questions the why of superheroes. Superman is no different. Stories like Kingdom Come and injustice focus on this, too. The loss of Lois - Superman's Laurie, his one connection to the world - makes him an apathetic despot.
Injustice is an elseworld entirely dedicated to the idea of everyone punching each other in the punch dimension. Superman's motivational shift barely makes any sense at all. (and Injustice is an elseworld that makes no engagement with the themes of Superman because the only point is punching)

Kingdom Come, for all that I love the story, is in large part a deconstruction of the superheroic archetype. And thus not a relevant point for 'who Superman is' because Superman is deeply entwined with the conventions of the superhero 'genre', which Kingdom Come is playing with. Superman's behavior is a reflection not of Superman, but of the superheroic archetype. Plus, I mean, him caring is a massive part of his character in that series.
 
This is, I suppose, neither here nor there but it kind of is because I made this thread dammit.

It is an interesting fact to me that comic book writers who people tend to associate with cynicism or grittiness really like Superman. People like Frank Miller or Garth Ennis, the latter especially because his hatred for capes is well-known. Alan Moore also likes Superman, although he's a bit different from those other two.

I wonder what it is about the world's biggest boy scout that melts the heart of everyone.

Guess no-one's cynical all the time?
 
Injustice is an elseworld entirely dedicated to the idea of everyone punching each other in the punch dimension. Superman's motivational shift barely makes any sense at all. (and Injustice is an elseworld that makes no engagement with the themes of Superman because the only point is punching)

Kingdom Come, for all that I love the story, is in large part a deconstruction of the superheroic archetype. And thus not a relevant point for 'who Superman is' because Superman is deeply entwined with the conventions of the superhero 'genre', which Kingdom Come is playing with. Superman's behavior is a reflection not of Superman, but of the superheroic archetype. Plus, I mean, him caring is a massive part of his character in that series.

So your answer is just to attack the work and ignore it. Just because you dislike Injustice doesn't mean it is lacking in meaning.

In Kingdom Come Superman does care - in a very abstract sort of way. He's so fixated on his ideals that he forgets the reality. He hates what superheroes have become and he's so lost in memories of better days (with Lois) that he's willing to ignore all the ethical implications of what he's doing to try and "fix" the world as fast as possible. The rush job of the metahuman prison really demonstrated he hoped more than thought about making the world better.

The thing is, if I was Norman, when Spectre asked me to choose, I'd have told him to immediately stop those bombs and save the superhumans. Because Superman and Wonder Woman and people like them really should rule the world. There's really no question about that. Someone once dragged out KC to show me a story that "deals with the issue" of superhumans taking over and shows why it's a bad thing. But the only thing bad about it was when Superman decided to leave humanity's fate to Magog because we "chose" Magog's breed of hero. He was consumed by naivete.

Of course the moral of the story is that this naivete - presented as an "instinctive" knowledge of right and wrong - is what makes Superman special an a cut above all other heroes.

This carries over to Injustice. Superman's breakdown at the end of Injustice 1 is a good comparison to how he abandoned humanity in KC. We "rejected" him and he just can't take it. He knows what's better for us - the story outright tells us this - and he's justifiably angry that we dare to question his wisdom.


Justice Lords Superman was a dog turd and you'd be right to brush him off as meaningless but Injustice and KC both obviously have a lot to say about the Superman ideal.
 
Last edited:
So your answer is just to attack the work and ignore it. Just because you dislike Injustice doesn't mean it is lacking in meaning.
Their answer is pointing out that Injustice has nothing to do with the character of Superman and brush it off because Superman's motivation there is shit. Injustice has no meaning or insight in Superman, and you are the only one attacking here because your argument falls apart if you stop accusing people of bias and consider the facts.
 
Their answer is pointing out that Injustice has nothing to do with the character of Superman and brush it off because Superman's motivation there is shit. Injustice has no meaning or insight in Superman, and you are the only one attacking here because your argument falls apart if you stop accusing people of bias and consider the facts.

Superman's shift makes perfect sense and is pretty much the same as KC. (Joker kills Lois) Adds a little detail of Clark being disillusioned with himself as opposed to being disillusioned with humanity.

Sorry, I'm not the one completely disregarding a work just because I have a bone to pick and want to say it has no meaning or useful insight. That is what I'd call bias.


I have learned a lot, though. Not from this thread - I had to consult Superman fans elsewhere.
Clark's been put in a no-win scenario in the comics. He threw Imperiex and B13 into the Big Bang in one case, which was intended to destroy (ie, KILL) them. He wasn't in a no-win scenario when he threw Darkseid into the Source Wall, and that's as close to a death sentence as a New God can get so I call it an execution. And done only because Clark was angry. The Bryne-era Phantom Zone criminals weren't really a no-win scenario, and I truly dislike that killing because the odds of them escaping was so slim....but at the same time I can sort of see the reasoning; if they did somehow escape and re-gain their powers Clark might never stop them again, and more to the point, leaving them on a dead world in a pocket universe means letting them starve to death, probably after eating each other. K-execution was a mercy, depending on how you look at it. Depending on how you think Clark's powers work, he allowed Russian Zod to die in a battle that might be close to a no-win scenario, or at least a fight with real crap odds.

Those "man of murder" complaints really annoy me. Superman has killed several times in the comics (not even counting the Golden Age). There is more than enough precedence for what happened in MoS. You dont have to like it, but saying its out of character just illustrates a lack of knowledge. Clark's "no kill" policy only applies until it doesnt.
Can we agree then it's not "wrong" to have Superman kill, since it's all up to editorial? Probably not. Superman has been killing since the 80's, at the end of CoIE, when Kal-L killed the Anti Monitor. Then every few years after that, Superman is faced with the responsibility of using lethal force against an unstoppable foe, as it should be. Next with Zod and co. then Doomsday and Hank Henshaw's attempted murder. After that there was Imperiex and Brainiac 13.

In the New 52 it's kind of ambiguous; he kills parademons and lobotomizes self aware robots. Things like Superdoom conveniently self destruct when needed and when Superman has to kill H'El, he refuses and Jor-El gets impaled. Then Superman's alternative to "murder" is beating H'El senseless and imprisoning his essence within chronal strands "into a perpetual loop of freezing and thawing for time immemorial."

Seems like editorial is trying to have its cake and eat it too, nowadays.

Quite frankly, I wish less people would fixate on justified killing and Instead turn their moral outrages to examine why comic books are so obsessed with NOT killing, to the extent they invent alternatives that are far more evil and insidious.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I'm not the one completely disregarding a work just because I have a bone to pick and want to say it has no meaning or useful insight. That is what I'd call bias.
You are a lying hypocrite. When Lunatic gave you reasons why Injustice has no meaning or insight, you ignored them and started whining and strawmanning because you hate Superman and every single argument you made up against him was called out on the bullshit it was. Stop projecting your bias on everyone who doesn't share your fantasies and grow the fuck up.
 
You are a lying hypocrite. When Lunatic gave you reasons why Injustice has no meaning or insight, you ignored them and started whining and strawmanning because you hate Superman and every single argument you made up against him was called out on the bullshit it was. Stop projecting your bias on everyone who doesn't share your fantasies and grow the fuck up.

Hm, let's see this startling insight about why "Injustice has no meaning."
Injustice is an elseworld entirely dedicated to the idea of everyone punching each other in the punch dimension. Superman's motivational shift barely makes any sense at all. (and Injustice is an elseworld that makes no engagement with the themes of Superman because the only point is punching)

So...where are these reasons? I only see someone saying "it is about punching." That's not a reason - that's a baseless opinion that ignores what the story is about and all the great context established by the Injustice prequel comics.

And at last, you show the true colors of all the people who bitch about Man of Steel. I have done nothing but praise Superman's character this entire thread. But you're an elitist snob who thinks anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow views of the character just hates Superman.

One of the first comics I ever read was about Superman. I cheered Superman on to the very end. But because it's not "your" Superman, it doesn't count.
 
Last edited:
And at last, you show the true colors of all the people who bitch about Man of Steel. I have done nothing but praise Superman's character this entire thread. But you're an elitist snob who thinks anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow views of the character just hates Superman.

One of the first comics I ever read was about Superman. I cheered Superman on to the very end. But because it's not "your" Superman, it doesn't count.

Are you arguing that anyone who doesn't like Man of Steel doesn't like Superman?

Because, uh, that's a very weird take.
 
Injustice and how Superman becomes how he is in the game makes a lot more sense in the comics. And it's mostly the result of his closest friends total dicks to him and condemning him for everything and havingbzero sympathy. Wonder Woman on the other hand doesn't make no sense, because she does a complete 180 from how she normally acts in most other comics.
 
Are you arguing that anyone who doesn't like Man of Steel doesn't like Superman?

Because, uh, that's a very weird take.

No, that's what he's saying. I loved Man of Steel, a lot. But he claims I hate Superman.

If you hate MOS, that's cool. I strongly disagree but it doesn't make you less of a Superman fan. I'm in no position to judge anyone a "true" or "false" fan.
Injustice and how Superman becomes how he is in the game makes a lot more sense in the comics. And it's mostly the result of his closest friends total dicks to him and condemning him for everything and havingbzero sympathy. Wonder Woman on the other hand doesn't make no sense, because she does a complete 180 from how she normally acts in most other comics.

It's kinda why I thought Injustice was inspired by KC. The Wonder Woman in these two series seems very similar.
 
Last edited:
Hm, let's see this startling insight about why "Injustice has no meaning."


So...where are these reasons? I only see someone saying "it is about punching." That's not a reason - that's a baseless opinion that ignores what the story is about and all the great context established by the Injustice prequel comics.

And at last, you show the true colors of all the people who bitch about Man of Steel. I have done nothing but praise Superman's character this entire thread. But you're an elitist snob who thinks anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow views of the character just hates Superman.

One of the first comics I ever read was about Superman. I cheered Superman on to the very end. But because it's not "your" Superman, it doesn't count.
Now, see, we don't disagree with you because you have a "different view" on Superman, we disagree with you because your view is so counter to how the character has been portrayed for the past 75 Years in 95% of mediums that it is actually shocking. See, I don't mind if Superman is different really, I don't mind if he is a pure idealist, a solemn philospher, or even...well...not a good person. See, I've read a ton of Superman comics myself, and I do think I have a decent handle on the guy. I dont hate MoS's Superman because he is different, I hate him because the writing doesn't support what they were trying to do. A solemn down-to-earth Superman has worked, in Bryne's Run, in Kurt Busiek's Secret Identity, several times. See, your saying we are elitists refusing to see things from your point of view, but really, you seem to be determined to strawman everyone who dares disagree with your stance as an elitist moron who just doesn't get it. We get it, we just disagree. Your the one refusing to see things from our point of view, not us, so seriously dude, get over yourself.
 
No, that's what he's saying. I loved Man of Steel, a lot. But he claims I hate Superman.

If you hate MOS, that's cool. I strongly disagree but it doesn't make you less of a Superman fan. I'm in no position to judge anyone a "true" or "false" fan.

I mean, you edited your post, which this whole thing is coming off like you're accusing us of being morons who "just don't get it" for not agreeing with your particular take on Superman.

That, and constantly using words like "bias" to describe opinions on comic book characters isn't helping. "Bias", "elitist", "snob", etc. aren't magic words that instantly dispel any argument you don't like. We're talking about fictional characters here, there's no "objective" POV for someone to be "wrong" about.
 
Now, see, we don't disagree with you because you have a "different view" on Superman, we disagree with you because your view is so counter to how the character has been portrayed for the past 75 Years in 95% of mediums that it is actually shocking. See, I don't mind if Superman is different really, I don't mind if he is a pure idealist, a solemn philospher, or even...well...not a good person. See, I've read a ton of Superman comics myself, and I do think I have a decent handle on the guy. I dont hate MoS's Superman because he is different, I hate him because the writing doesn't support what they were trying to do. A solemn down-to-earth Superman has worked, in Bryne's Run, in Kurt Busiek's Secret Identity, several times. See, your saying we are elitists refusing to see things from your point of view, but really, you seem to be determined to strawman everyone who dares disagree with your stance as an elitist moron who just doesn't get it. We get it, we just disagree. Your the one refusing to see things from our point of view, not us, so seriously dude, get over yourself.

I mean, you edited your post, which this whole thing is coming off like you're accusing us of being morons who "just don't get it" for not agreeing with your particular take on Superman.

That, and constantly using words like "bias" to describe opinions on comic book characters isn't helping. "Bias", "elitist", "snob", etc. aren't magic words that instantly dispel any argument you don't like. We're talking about fictional characters here, there's no "objective" POV for someone to be "wrong" about.

You did realize what he said, right? I've engaged with people this entire thread. I respect the views held by posters like @Q99 even though they are the opposite of my own on this.

But when someone bursts in and tells me to "grow the fuck up" and that I "hate" a character, when they put words and beliefs to me that I do not have, I feel justified in calling them an elitist snob and several worse things besides.

So, yeah. I have edited my post because I have a bad temper and that post put me in a bad mood.

I'm sorry I painted you all with the same brush in that post. It was wrong of me.
 
Last edited:
So your answer is just to attack the work and ignore it. Just because you dislike Injustice doesn't mean it is lacking in meaning.
Injustice doesn't have anything deep to say about its characters. Injustice isn't evidence that any of those characters are anything. Injustice is a Mortal Kombat game. Every narrative decision made was made with the intent that two characters would be punching each other inside of five minutes, first and foremost. You want to know how I can tell? Because Injustice doesn't try to raise any questions at all, or to inspire, or to demotivate. No time is spent going 'hey, maybe the Regime was a good idea but taken too far' - no, time is spent instead lasermurdering Captain Marvel and having Hal Jordan pull a Sinestro for no adequately explained reason. No time is spent saying 'hey, maybe Batman's resistance isn't the best thing ever' - time is instead spent on Batman V. Batman: Dawn of Batman, with the closest to a question being Harley Quinn immediately devolving into the Joker's toy (to facilitate more punching). Seeing this evil Superman doesn't make any of the characters from the more traditional universe make inspirational speeches, or try to show the world that things can be better, or anything of the sort. There's no moral or character evolution. Just 'hey, evil Supes, time for punching'. The existence of the Regime isn't an attempt to deconstruct superheroes or anything else interesting, because the characters spend absolutely no time reflecting on anything, and again the narrative never prompts questions. Nobody thinks about the Regime, they just stop it. Because it is Evil and they are Good and this facilitates punching.

I mean, the game's fun, but the plot has all the depth of a kiddie pool. There's no greater meaning there.

EDIT: I can't speak to the comics - maybe they do all of these things alongside making Harley Quinn into a pedophile. But I doubt it.
 
Last edited:
Ahh, that may be a big disconnect here. I actually see relatively positive reviews of the Injustice comics (which have gone on surprisingly long).
 
Ahh, that may be a big disconnect here. I actually see relatively positive reviews of the Injustice comics (which have gone on surprisingly long).
He seems to be referring more to the game itself. As for the comic... well, I view Injustice as more a success of delivery than interesting writing or messaging. It was a cordoned-off continuity and entirely delivered online alongside a successful game. It's very approachable; I've met plenty of people who have started with or only read Injustice. But the actual story is starting from such an absurdly maudlin and over the top point (Superman gets tricked into punching his pregnant wife to death, which nukes Metropolis) that it was really only a matter of time before it turned into a lunatic rollercoaster and the most memorable moment turned out to be that time Alfred got hopped up on superpower juice and kicked Superman in the face so hard that his shoe explodes. It's not bad for the most part, but it's not at all a definitive take - best conveyed by the fact that it is, by its own logic, a horribly divergent alternate timeline.
 
He seems to be referring more to the game itself. As for the comic... well, I view Injustice as more a success of delivery than interesting writing or messaging. It was a cordoned-off continuity and entirely delivered online alongside a successful game. It's very approachable; I've met plenty of people who have started with or only read Injustice. But the actual story is starting from such an absurdly maudlin and over the top point (Superman gets tricked into punching his pregnant wife to death, which nukes Metropolis) that it was really only a matter of time before it turned into a lunatic rollercoaster and the most memorable moment turned out to be that time Alfred got hopped up on superpower juice and kicked Superman in the face so hard that his shoe explodes. It's not bad for the most part, but it's not at all a definitive take - best conveyed by the fact that it is, by its own logic, a horribly divergent alternate timeline.

Yea. I should mention, the reviews aren't so much that it's great, just that it's probably better than it has any right to be being a lead-in to a not-all-that-great-game.

And the divergences are interesting. Like, in this universe, Superman and Lex have been friends for a long time, which may be a factor in his different morals to begin with. And, well, someone less interesting but as I mentioned, Wonder Woman is pretty aggro, fairly strongly pushing for the regime from early on.

Still, stuff like Deadman's successor which leads to this moment gets shown to me, so...
 
Back
Top