No, because you can be impeached for something that isn't a crime.Presumably federal criminal charges would follow on foot of anything resulting in a President being impeached by the House and then convicted/removed from office by the Senate?
I'd say 1976 for sure, Ford had both people pissed off about Watergate and people pissed that his pardoning of Nixon was an admission of guilt, so the math works. As for 1988 it depends on what he'd have done in the intervening time. Absolutely hammering on Bush for the Contras and other CIA deepstate boondoggles definitely could've worked. It elides his own family's complicity in several of those incidents but I still see a path forward. More interesting question: does he double down on Israel or pull back?In a scenario where RFK survived his gunshot injuries, but bowed out from the 1968 election due to incapacitation, could he have run again in some future year?
Could he have won in 1976 against Ford? 1988 against Bush?
Friendly reminder that right after the war Israel actually did offer to return everything but East Jerusalem in exchange for peace. The Arab countries didn't accept that offer and instead released the Khartoum Resolution, which called for no peace, negotiations, or recognition of Israel. The Arabs held firm to the Resolution, also known as the Three Noes of Khartoum, for well over a decade and it was only broken in 1979, when Egypt recognized Israel and negotiated peace and the return of the Sinai Peninsula.I mean, based on its proximity to the end of the 6 day war I assume that even had the Americans intended to bring the pain they wouldn't have their ducks lined by before the end of the war; at which I assume the minimum response from Johnson would the "Hahaha No Eshkol. get the fuck back behind the Green Line now. or else"?
I'd imagine sending the Israeli navy to the bottom of the Mediterranean might alarm other American allies though?