Hm... you guys will need a pretty serious push for All-Defeating Stance to win here! There is certainly a large fraction of voters that would prefer OaF first if you can get it, though that requires some source of picks...
You have 16.7 Arete, by the way!
makes sense to meOn the other hand, if Adorie convinces either Hunger or Gisena that even one more day of the Lord Protector's dealings is more dangerous than resolving the Decimator's Affliction with utmost haste, would you guys be okay with Hunger letting the Decimation ride for a number of days while they focus on the campaign against the Lord Protector?
I thought we had 16.7 Arete?
If we hide behind Gisena we don't get picks though? We dont social Adorie, Gisena does.Stay the course, especially since OaF was strengthened by the greedy Eye of the Storm. Seize the opportunity we took this risk for! If we hide behind Gisena, we won't need ADS to social Adorie.
We can get picks at the Huntress's Moon target. No need to risk Adorie socialing us to letting Decimator run for a while to get rid of the Lord Protector, after all.If we hide behind Gisena we don't get picks though? We dont social Adorie, Gisena does.
I mean since we are getting both artifacts either way, the risk here is pretty damn minimal. I would say it's the opposite of greed. We rarely get an chance at 2/3 picks(?) with no risk to Hunger.Hmm, based on current activity, I expect our multiplier for this cycle to be low. Having the story updates be on a 4-day cycle right after a contentious vote seems to have done quite a bit of damage to the momentum of the quest.
This is most relevant if we do actually choose Breach here; while I'm sure we can make up the five remaining Arete in two update's time, getting a good multiplier this cycle might be the difference between walking away from Breach with OaF plus Iridescence or just baking the two picks towards a DA. Either could be good, really, even if Iridescence is more valuable than ever nowadays.
But anyway, I really don't think we need to enter negotiations we are so disadvantaged towards we have more effective alternatives on offer. It's a needless risk in my opinion. It's more greed on top of greed. While I suppose that's fitting given what we chose, we don't need to be bound by such things; one might even say not being so is a good idea! I really recommend a safe option here, given we stand to get little immediate gain while possibly committing ourselves for a long time with Breach.
Right now is basically the perfect time to play it safe, so let's go for it.
A bigger commitment here may actually mean increased death chances in the future though, even if we both agree to fight the Lord Protector. She might ask for the completion of dangerous missions, for example. She might also force us to prioritize fighting the Tyrant over Mitigating the Decimation as well. Really, any agreement that tampers our latitude of action could be really unpleasant for us.I mean since we are getting both artifacts either way, the risk here is pretty damn minimal. I would say it's the opposite of greed. We rarely get an chance at 2/3 picks(?) with no risk to Hunger.
The alternative is fighting something that potentially comes with actual death chances to get those picks ya know. Hunger need to get experience at social combat so that he can get picks that way in the Human Sphere, so this sounds like an good start to that as well.
Doesn't change the fact it's not greedy at all especially with us getting an chance to get Once and Future.A bigger commitment here may actually mean increased death chances in the future though, even if we both agree to fight the Lord Protector. She might ask for the completion of dangerous missions, for example. She might also force us to prioritize fighting the Tyrant over Mitigating the Decimation as well. Really, any agreement that tampers our latitude of action could be really unpleasant for us.
If we do try to get those picks on our own, it will be done on our own terms. A loss to Adorie here could quite literally take the matter out of our hands, and we might not even get the picks! It's not immediate risk, sure, but you can't say it's not risky.