- Location
- East Coast
Protip about the apocalypse: Everyone think they'd be Lord Humongous but most of them would probably end up being the guy who catches the razor boomerang.
...the implied gay lover of Lord Humongous' main enforcer?
Protip about the apocalypse: Everyone think they'd be Lord Humongous but most of them would probably end up being the guy who catches the razor boomerang.
Welcome to Arizona. Don't forget the sunscreen....did they have a glass case stating "In case of spontaneous temporal translocation, break glass for spontaneous cheesy cowboy asthetic?"
The Old West was built by the US Army and the national railroad trusts, not by lone gunslingers. Without either of those, you just get neo-Mongols, which is where these guys are gonna be in a generation.
I think they two of you are seriously ignoring the developments in animal grazing techniques. Why be a nomad and have maybe 60 animals, when you can be settled, and divide a plot with movable fences and easily control 5 times as much without ever needing to move?Otherwise they'd literally be subsistence nomadic herders (which is what they're probably going to be in a generation or two anyway).
But so long as optimism is retained with some planing keeping it in check? They might just pull it off with amazing results.
Yes, Yuma is pretty bad.Man, the 'Cochise Government' is really just as fucked as the Legitimists. It's just some crappy form of feudalism and anarchy with MERICA slathered on. And now there's a bunch of army units running around, complete with angry and disillusioned old world vets. A situation like that can't last, someone's gonna declare themselves king, or someone's gonna play kingmaker.
Yuma's going to end in revolution, and from there ... who knows. Maybe things'll turn out okay. This? This place is gonna turn into a hellhole once things completely break down.
From discussions elsewhere it's been hinted that none of the states we've met so far are all that durable in the long term, but I think it's fair to say that the Cochise government will be one of the first to fall to warlordism and banditry. Sounds like they've barely got a handle on things as it is.
I'd gotten the sense that the Northern Government would muddle through, left to its own devices.
Sooner or later one of the brigades is going to end up under the command of someone ambitious, and he's going to wonder why fight for the landowners in exchange for payments when they can just take whatever they want instead...
From discussions elsewhere it's been hinted that none of the states we've met so far are all that durable in the long term, but I think it's fair to say that the Cochise government will be one of the first to fall to warlordism and banditry. Sounds like they've barely got a handle on things as it is.
I'd gotten the sense that the Northern Government would muddle through, left to its own devices.
The Northern Government will have problems, but it's actually doing the things you need to do to build a state.
Everyone else is in essence coasting on inertia while hoping in their heart of hearts that magic keeps the inevitable from happening.
It probably won't.
Even the Northern Government isn't innocent of this - they still think, deep down, that they're the legitimate government of the State of Arizona, and one way or another they'll make everyone else recognize it. Of course, they will probably never have boots on the Pacific, and as for pinning down the neo-nomads...yeah, ask China how that went.
Even the Northern Government isn't innocent of this - they still think, deep down, that they're the legitimate government of the State of Arizona, and one way or another they'll make everyone else recognize it. Of course, they will probably never have boots on the Pacific, and as for pinning down the neo-nomads...yeah, ask China how that went.
Honestly pushing the Neo-nomads from "the range they can plausibly project power and influence" to "the range in which they are outside the government's own reach" is as good as actual conquest in terms of how much damage the techno-huns can now actually inflict on the settlers.
I'd be extremely hesitant about making that comparison.
The US beat the Comanche, eventually, because their superiority in firepower meant they were able to kill Comanche herds. It would be a fight, but my money's on the Northern Government, given that Flagstaff has its own munitions works (EDIT: and enough firepower to save Custer just, like, lying around in houses)
Oh, the Northern Government is most assuredly not going to continue in quite the shape they are now. But there's a good chance of something durable coming into being there, something that can trace its roots fairly straight to Flagstaff.
And don't overestimate the nomads. If China's your example, well, then nomads are like every gambler ever in a casino. They have good times, they have bad times, they have the occasional excellent times--they may even every now and then break the bank, but in the end, the house always wins.
Honestly pushing the Neo-nomads from "the range they can plausibly project power and influence" to "the range in which they are outside the government's own reach" is as good as actual conquest in terms of how much damage the techno-huns can now actually inflict on the settlers.
"Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you."