Because it means wealthier nobles with more luxuries.Merchants are the lowest class. Why would a reform that helps them appeal to nobles?
They do feel threatened, hence the whole moon talk. But that's also one of the points of the military reform action, to assuage their fear and convince them of "the lack of threat of the military, or rather their capacity to be controlled".
Be that as it may, if we don't pick that option they're still going to feel threatened by the military and thus by us as well. And I have confidence in Kiralo's bullshitting skills that he can lessen those fears. It is a major concern of them, otherwise they wouldn't spend half their time implying Kiralo is the moon that they fear.Yes, which is why I doubt it somewhat since recent events would make it hard to consider that the military can be easily corralled.
Playing devil's advocate here, but the way it is worded implies that Kiralo won't argue that the reforms benefiting merchants is a good thing but rather that they are needed for a variety of reasons and because of that they should still support them, despite the fact that it might help merchants.[] The necessity and virtue of the agricultural reforms, even to the extent that they seem designed to aid the merchant.
Going by my limited knowledge of Chinese thought, the merchants are considered the lowest class, so arguing that the reforms benefit the merchants seems misguided. If we want agricultural reforms, we should stress the benefit to the farmers, who are much more respectable (at least in theory.)
Playing devil's advocate here, but the way it is worded implies that Kiralo won't argue that the reforms benefiting merchants is a good thing but rather that they are needed for a variety of reasons and because of that they should still support them, despite the fact that it might help merchants.
Well, but why mention them at all? It is not as if being a merchant is some unclean and despicable profession, so it is certainly not an inherent flaw if the reforms benefit the merchants.Playing devil's advocate here, but the way it is worded implies that Kiralo won't argue that the reforms benefiting merchants is a good thing but rather that they are needed for a variety of reasons and because of that they should still support them, despite the fact that it might help merchants.
Ah, but you have more than four votes. Gingganz, Zeitgeist, Neptune, veekie and me. That makes five votes!I mean, I'm kinda hoping for more than four votes? The vote probably closes tomorrow night?
This seems like the important one, given their specific concerns?
This makes me think they care more about the centralization than the agricultural reforms, so:It's not their only concern. But it is the one that they bring up first, certainly. Or perhaps second.
Centralization in general is one of their biggest concerns. The agricultural reforms are no doubt also a concern for them, but their concern for centralization is the one they bring up first, after their concerns about the military, so it's likely to be higher on their list. If we can convince them that it's really not a problem, they will be much less opposed to the reforms in general while simply convincing them on the agricultural reforms will still leave them unconvinced on the rest. And if we pick agricultural reforms along with filial piety, which is the most-voted option currently, we are basically ignoring what I think are their two biggest concerns, the military and centralization.They were afraid that this was overreach. There was a traditionalism that feared that too much Imperial interference in noble affairs was a mistake, from a practical perspective. Not a matter of the Emperor being in any way inferior to them, but in the difficulties and limitations of the world and of propriety, for the nobility had a purpose.