It's a shame Avenger isn't getting more traction. Not only is it thematically fitting for Hunger, it's guaranteed to be relevant regardless of which route wins! With the wind of righteousness at Hunger's back, all his condemnations will pierce foes to their core. I understand the reluctance to invest seven Arete in a conditional boost which isn't going to always be active. If we could be assured of victory, the greed build of Preeminence would be preferable. But there's no guarantee that things will play out that way; a wounded beast is at its most dangerous, that's the entire reason I wrote up a 'the reason you suck' speech to pierce Sten's armor of rationalization. Combat with an absurdly strong veteran with millennia of experience is dangerous enough, but now he's got nothing left to lose; let's not play rocket tag and risk racking up more conditions. Breaking Sten's will was explicitly cited as a benefit of killing Evangeline first!
With Avenger, every physical and social attack Hunger lands is tripled in effectiveness! Doesn't anyone want to see Hunger rhetorically suplex Bearic, who's an Avenger-approved target? Someone who mutters encouraging aphorisms under their breath is no indomitable bastion of will, to say nothing of the numerous, gaping holes in his worldview.
By contrast, Headsman is just... really bad. It robs us of one of our most relevant capabilities. I might not vote to take it even if it was free, that's how anti-synergistic it is. We pay through the nose to nerf ourselves and not even referencing Game of Thrones can blind us to that truth. Besides, if there was ever a man who had mastered the Self-Defeating Stance, it was Ned Stark. Following in his footsteps appeals not at all.
Internet's still out, will see about index updates later.