Is there any reason why a counter-weight trebuchete is not feasible using roman engineering?
They believe in the strict seperation of plebeian and patrician, and while they support the continued power of the Senate, it is largely because the Senate is mainly patrician. They believe in a whole lot of concepts that essentially boil down to: "We're on top because we're the most suitable people to lead Rome — if we weren't, we wouldn't be on top." Keeping the balance of society the way it is will ultimately preserve the Republic.
The traditionalists hold fast to the mors maiorum, the way of the ancestors. This is good to do because tradition demands it. The Senate is on top because it's always been on top. They genuinely believe that the Republic is a net good for Rome and her people, and that it's preservation pleases the gods. They generally understand the need for change or reform, as long as it stays fast to the old ways. They especially respect strength, bravery, self-sufficiency, and piety — the virtues of Rome since her founding.
Fair enough, also being a siege engineer during the roman civil war is honestly not that useful seeing as there were very few sieges.
In general I agree with you, but the traditionalist optimate, being very keen on the mos maiorum would be like Cato the younger and praise cabbage over refined dishes or decry the debauchery of having wooden seats for attending theatre.Eh, I wouldn't expect our opinions on Hellenic culture to be dependant on our politics. Lucullus was both an optimate and (in)famously Hellenised. Marius was a populare but determinedly and harshly Roman.
In general I agree with you, but the traditionalist optimate, being very keen on the mos maiorum would be like Cato tge younger and praise the cabbage over refined dishes or decry the debauchery of having wooden seats for attending theatre.
Well maybe not that extreme, but probably less open than other political outlooks.
True, but Cato is very much an outlier.
Actually, you know what, just to clarify this for myself. @Telamon Which of the options would you use to describe Lucullus?
Lucullus is a moderate Traditionalist Optimate, while Pompey is/will be a Conservative Optimate. Traditionalists like Lucullus, Cato, and Scaevola all very in how hardline they are and how they interpret said traditions, but all generally skew towards being capable and incorruptible administrators with a hard Republican bent.
Where would he get the ideas for those?Can we invent the number 0? Or other major parts of mathematics?
The traditionalists hold fast to the mors maiorum, the way of the ancestors. This is good to do because tradition demands it. The Senate is on top because it's always been on top. They genuinely believe that the Republic is a net good for Rome and her people, and that it's preservation pleases the gods. They generally understand the need for change or reform, as long as it stays fast to the old ways. They especially respect strength, bravery, self-sufficiency, and piety — the virtues of Rome since her founding.
Traditionalists like Lucullus, Cato, and Scaevola all very in how hardline they are and how they interpret said traditions, but all generally skew towards being capable and incorruptible administrators with a hard Republican bent. They usually make for good lawyers due to their firm adherence to how 'things should be'.
@Telamon, now I'm curious to hear how you'd describe the Idealist faction, who you'd identify as Idealists (would Cicero qualify, or would he be considered a Traditionalist Optimate?), and what character/personality traits are typically identified with Idealist leanings.
So pretty much like us if we go with Plan Cicero?Cicero would probably be an Idealist, though an Optimate one, with a few drops of traditionalist.