And a little fullerened anti-matter sounds like just the thing to beef up the explosive power without sacrificing its compact size.
@Esbilon - That a reference to Schlock Mercenary?
And a little fullerened anti-matter sounds like just the thing to beef up the explosive power without sacrificing its compact size.
Hm, SLA Industries, perhaps? That's where the Shaktar are from, I think.Sadly, I have never heard of Angelic Layer before. The rpg in question is neither Shadowrun, nor Paranoia. I should also point out that there is only one reference to an rpg, the other out-standing reference (which was not as easy as I thought and I therefore up to the usual +50) is to a web comic.
It is inspired by Schlock, but not what I was thinking about. The reference I had in mind is also a Schlock reference though.
Correct!Hm, SLA Industries, perhaps? That's where the Shaktar are from, I think.
Not sure about the Webcomic, though. The only ones I know that might be fitting are Schlock Mercenary and Girl Genius, but there isn't anything I can see in the text that immediately makes me think of it as a reference, much less identify where it's from.
I really doubt the Citadel government would leave such a massive loophole and I doubt Esbilon will let you use such an obvious loophole.
Hm... is the first paragraph under Basic Genemodding perhaps the Schlock Reference? Maybe related to Dr. Edward Bunniguns' birth?Correct!
The Big Picture (capitalized and repeated) was the reference in the previous update.
Nope. It's not really subtle at all.Hm... is the first paragraph under Basic Genemodding perhaps the Schlock Reference? Maybe related to Dr. Edward Bunniguns' birth?
Arc reactors would be covered by a whole host of patents, protecting both technology and principles behind it, I think.A new component is often the only revolutionary thing (and therefore the only patentable thing) about about a new invention.
Obviously it is, or we'd have found it already.
Arc reactors would be covered by a whole host of patents, protecting both technology and principles behind it, I think.
Which is why the patents need to be as broad as possible. Otherwise the competition would just change some minute detail and patent the analogue as their own. That's what patenting principles is for.Maybe so but we want to patent in such a way that gives us maximum protection for the least amount of hassle (I.e. production tie ups and costing restrictions).
Don't know much about the patents on technological principles just a few bits from my grandfather who once did technical drafts for patents.
Wait; is perhaps Revy's complains about the laser she bought lacking a "powering up sound", and contemplating that she could always add something to her own product later, the Schlock-reference? About Sgt. Schlock's plasma cannon and it's "OMMMMMINOUS HUMMMMMM"?
Wait; is perhaps Revy's complains about the laser she bought lacking a "powering up sound", and contemplating that she could always add something to her own product later, the Schlock-reference? About Sgt. Schlock's plasma cannon and it's "OMMMMMINOUS HUMMMMMM"?
So, is that a "Yes" or a "No"?
I'd think the song was a hint, but that's another 'no'.
and just under nine months later, through the assisted miracle of birth, you were unleashed upon an unsuspecting galaxy.
Song didn't play for me for some reason; just said something about an error.
That, and in some cases it can just be difficult to pic out, like "Big Picture" for SLA Industries, because Big Picture is also a fairly common phrase in politics and whatnot.It seems my writing is so stock full of pop culture references that I need to be more specific when I call on you to identify specific ones.
Thanks! Put them into Peak Human, please.BTW, for the record: +50 Research points for identifying SLA Industries.
The song was "Looking for love in all the wrong places."
The segment about Brian and Revy training with Mom-Shepard, then?
More nopes. And yes, it should.The segment about Brian and Revy training with Mom-Shepard, then?
If that isn't it, I give up.
Oh, one thing I just noticed, though; the title of the recent update say 2171, but it should be 2173.
...Wut?
This made me laugh way more than it should have.
On the fusion reactor density issue: It's unlikely in the extreme that ME fusion reactors are based on the same magnetic confinement technology as ITER. I'm no expert, granted, but it seems like inertial confinement schemes are a lot more compact, especially given the sort of shenanigans you can get up to with mass effect fields.
Also guys whining about the SA being the Citadel's bitch? Remember Ascension? The Citadel found out that Humanity was working on AI and threatened to impose crippling sanctions. The Human ambassador said fuck that, and the Council backed down because a war with Humanity would have been too costly. And this was vanilla-no-Sheppard-crazy-space-magic Humanity. Humanity is a big fucking fish. (I'm talking to you @Carrnage and @Mochinator.)
His handle is Crazy Tom, not "asshat."
...Wut?
Oh, sure. If you only take into account the reaction chamber itself. If you take the full installation, however. Now, sure, ok, with mass effect you could do graviational confinement probably, which might be far more compact. Still, there's a problem of steady state operation (inertial confinement isn't steady state, it's impulse based), but that's engineering. The point, however, is that no, inertial confinement is not more compact. Just look at NIF.