- Location
- Versailles
Does anyone know of an homebrew of the shard Exalted: Modern. I know one about gunstar and another about heaven's reach, but that's all
IIRC, the 'Flame' refers to Cytherea.Reading about Exalted, there is one thing I have been wondering about:
The Yozi KImberry's title is 'The Sea that marched against the Flame'. The Sea obviously refers to kimberry herself, but what is/was the Flame? I couldn't find anything about it.
I would posit that you should worry less about the fireballs and more about the demons and giant nigh-invulnerable vine serpents they can summon as soldiers. Brilliant raptor is, after all, one cannon that can be fired once or twice a minute, up to three times for an Exalt spending motes. The Sorcerer won't wipe out an army with it. Indeed, you'd be lucky to force a battlegroup crash on size 1/2.This is, like, hilarious.
I've just checked out the ranges of napoleonic era artillery. The maximum range of the largest one, from Russia, is a 12-pounder with a maximum range of 1800 metres, and an effective range of 825. Flight of the brilliant raptor has a range of 1800 yards, i.e. 1600 metres or 1.6 kilometres.
The range of the brilliant raptor is a spell that outranges Napoleonic era artillery.
Anyone marching up to a fort that holds a sorcerer is either suicidal, has good assets, or is just plain stupid.
Let's face it, the Storm-Mothers exist so that your Red-haired, Orchalicum armored Solar Dawn caste can strangle them in their courts and seize their loot so you can live like a queen. (and/or destroy Gem)To be honest, I think it's a bit ridiculous to have an entire direction all share the same gender norms. It kind of makes some sense in the West with the storm mothers if you squint a bit.
Sure, but the setting generally isn't lacking in asshole gods to kill.Let's face it, the Storm-Mothers exist so that your Red-haired, Orchalicum armored Solar Dawn caste can strangle them in their courts and seize their loot so you can live like a queen. (and/or destroy Gem)
Someone should go beat up the god of asshole gods.Sure, but the setting generally isn't lacking in asshole gods to kill.
I am unsure as to whether or nor there are Gods that have other Gods as a part of their portfolio, but I would assume there are not.
The god of assholes isn't to blame, guys. As we all know, gods only document their domain, so all he does is keep a convenient list of asshole deities for you to beat up. He's your best friend in the beat up asshole gods crusade.
The god of assholes isn't to blame, guys. As we all know, gods only document their domain, so all he does is keep a convenient list of asshole deities for you to beat up. He's your best friend in the beat up asshole gods crusade.
This sounds a lot more disturbing when you think of it in the context of, say, genocides or purges.
That's actually a canon god that's supposed to keep tracks of various cataclysms, in 2E.This sounds a lot more disturbing when you think of it in the context of, say, genocides or purges.
And they have gotten much more powerful than they were ever supposed to be.That's actually a canon god that's supposed to keep tracks of various cataclysms, in 2E.
Considering that you think they probably work for the person that is pretty much in charge of Bureaucratic Corruption...One of Ryzala's foot soldiers most likely.
but not just "dude is a dick".
Um. Sorry. I was thinking about 3e. I mean, sure, they haven't released the sorcery book yet. But being able to do stuff like gather motes means that you can shoot off a much larger number of artillery. Just make sure there's a bonfire near you.I would posit that you should worry less about the fireballs and more about the demons and giant nigh-invulnerable vine serpents they can summon as soldiers. Brilliant raptor is, after all, one cannon that can be fired once or twice a minute, up to three times for an Exalt spending motes. The Sorcerer won't wipe out an army with it. Indeed, you'd be lucky to force a battlegroup crash on size 1/2.
Ah, you may be talking 2e. In that case recall: Limited motes. An Essence 3 mortal Sorcerer has 30 motes, and IIRC that's a 15m spell. That's two shots. An Exalted Sorcerer ranges from 30-90 motes, IIRC, at E2 to 5. Give or take some from pool expanders. My Sidereal Sorcerer could have cast it...I think six times? Though the Exalt in 2e would be far better served just...walking down and killing all invaders themselves. Summon some demons to ease the process, but 2e defense values were bonkers.
Considering that you think they probably work for the person that is pretty much in charge of Bureaucratic Corruption...
Yeah, I'm gonna say "dude is a dick" is likely more accurate than you would like to admit.
I feel like it also draws from the trope of 'if everyone's corrupt, nobody is.' Where the entire bureaucracy is corrupt, so throwing in a few coins as bribe money is effectively just an extra fee.I'm not, like, a huge fan of "gods are all corrupt bureaucrats who are bureaucratically corrupt" tbh, where they're just corrupt because they're bureaucrats and they're bureaucrats 'cause they're corrupt and if you smash those two words together enough you get...sssoooomething idk. Corruption doesn't just emerge ex nihilo, I mean sure part of it is shitty people just being shitty people, but it's often a product of dysfunctional systems and a lack of social trust. And Heaven in Exalted is nothing if not dysfunctional and lacking in social trust because the nominal order has been a bad joke for centuries and if you want to get anything done you have to bend or break or circumvent some rules.
Like even something as simple as "I am a god of the rainy season and I need to requisition an additional storm from the Bureau of Seasons" runs into the problem of "if I don't have friends in the Bureau I'm gonna get kicked to the bottom of the list or my paperwork might just get fucking lost or used as a tea coaster 'cause they have a thousand other gods demanding the same resources" and "it'll be a lot easier to get a good storm if I do favors for a few gods there so they like me and know I won't just come when I need shit" and "oh wait isn't X my cousin, I could ask if he'd introduce me to some of them!". Playing purely by the employee handbook is asking to get fucked. Most corruption isn't just some dude slipping a briefcase full of money under the table.
To bring it back to the example: dude might not have a pleasant job and might not necessarily be well liked but it doesn't follow that he's personally petty, sadistic, or just a fucker in general because of his boss or working conditions. You could 100% play a character like that as a guy just trying to keep his head down and make it another day in Heaven without always living on the margins and I dunno why you'd say you can't really.
I'm not, like, a huge fan of "gods are all corrupt bureaucrats who are bureaucratically corrupt" tbh, where they're just corrupt because they're bureaucrats and they're bureaucrats 'cause they're corrupt and if you smash those two words together enough you get...sssoooomething idk.
Except that, again, Ryzala is in charge.I feel like it also draws from the trope of 'if everyone's corrupt, nobody is.' Where the entire bureaucracy is corrupt, so throwing in a few coins as bribe money is effectively just an extra fee.
Given the argument on Discord that raged about just this, you know this is a contentious opinion, so bluntly asserting it here as an objective fact feels... mm. It's a thing.That's dumb. Ryzala should not be synonymous with corruption and making the Divine Bureaucracy corrupt as hell in the style of a Western bureaucracy is not actually very clever or subversive at all.
When I say "should" it indicates normativity rather than positivity; I am making a normative statement based on my own preferences, not a positive statement that indicates objective observation. While the mirror to the Discord is funny, and has lead to a great many neo-platonic "as above, so below" jokes (though they're more like "as below, so below" really; we're all damned here), I don't actually think I should be prevented from making such a statement in the thread because we had an argument about something related on Discord, nor do I feel particularly inclined to drag a private chat into the public comings and goings of the thread lest it be seen as some sort of dumb shadow cabal.Given the argument on Discord that raged about just this, you know this is a contentious opinion, so bluntly asserting it here as an objective fact feels... mm. It's a thing.
I wasn't there for this Discord incident, but...Given the argument on Discord that raged about just this, you know this is a contentious opinion, so bluntly asserting it here as an objective fact feels... mm. It's a thing.
And when you follow that with "making the Divine Bureaucracy corrupt as hell in the style of a Western bureaucracy is not actually very clever" that reads like an objective assertion.When I say "should" it indicates normativity rather than positivity; I am making a normative statement based on my own preferences, not a positive statement that indicates objective observation.
Given the argument on Discord that raged about just this, you know this is a contentious opinion, so bluntly asserting it here as an objective fact feels... mm. It's a thing.