It seems strange to me that an entire village survives on the influx of money from a bunch of students who come by like a plague of locusts probably 9 days out of the year, so I would be more surprised than not that non-Hogwarts students swing by. Just maybe not typically on Hogwarts days.
Makes sense. Same as how a joke shop on Diagon Alley survives when you'd really only expect big business in the pre Hogwarts rush.

Does he respect, even like McGonagall? Yeah; hard not to after working closely with someone for decades. Would he choose McGonagall over Hazel, a witch over a fellow Squib? Oh hell no.

McGonagall also has the advantage of being a cat 25% of the time. 😆
 
It is interesting to see Filch become, essentially, Hazel's Hagrid. Considering that, it would be interesting to see the relationship between Filch and Hagrid, if any, expanded upon, if it would influence Hagrid's stance on Hazel once they actually meet.
 
So, why does Filch consider Hazel a squib? I mean, she's very obviously magical and can cast spells if you have eyes to see and you were around at the right times. She just doesn't/can't use a wand. Does this make her a fellow outcast? Yes. Does it make her a squib? No. If anything I feel like she fits in the same circle as squibs, werewolves and nonhuman sapient magicals. Similar yeah, same thing no.
 
Does this make her a fellow outcast? Yes. Does it make her a squib? No. If anything I feel like she fits in the same circle as squibs, werewolves and nonhuman sapient magicals. Similar yeah, same thing no.
True enough, but the reason she is an outcast is that she 'can't' use magic, it doesn't matter (much) that she in truth can, they are outcasts for the same reason.
 
I'm guessing Hazel and Sally-Anne are about to have a classic Hazel adventure, only to come back (possibly with someone from far off history in tow, if not more than one given that mirror dialogue is pretty clearly a dialogue) and discover that some big troll brouhaha happened in the castle while they were busy being eaten by a mirror.
 
You know I really like dichotomy between what Voldemort probably was and what Hazel is. In a way they both come from the same origin. They were both outcasts, they were both able to use wandless magic.

Tom seems to have comformed. He became his abusers. He learned all about wizards, took on all their traits especially their worst ones and spread the misery of his childhood as far as he could.

Hazel broke the mould. She learned and is learning about what makes her different and embraced it. She seeks out those wizards rejected, learns of them, befriends them and takes a little bit of them with her. It's also not like Hazel rejects wizards, she has picked up certain wizard traits.

They are two paths that the same person could have taken. Hazel has taken the path less taken, seemingly darker but perhaps with a brighter end.
 
Last edited:
So, why does Filch consider Hazel a squib? I mean, she's very obviously magical and can cast spells if you have eyes to see and you were around at the right times. She just doesn't/can't use a wand. Does this make her a fellow outcast? Yes. Does it make her a squib? No. If anything I feel like she fits in the same circle as squibs, werewolves and nonhuman sapient magicals. Similar yeah, same thing no.
The reason Filch considers Hazel a Squib is exactly what you said. Nonhuman sapient magicals. Except she isn't nonhuman. Her parents were human, a wizard and witch even. So she isn't a nonhuman nor a half-breed, nor even a Muggle whose humanity is debated among certain slices of the wizarding world. She has to be given a human label, to be put in a box with the word 'human' written upon in.

Additionally, the mechanics of how magic work aren't even what Filch is concerned about in this moment, and I think that's part of what's tripping you up. Let's instead look at this through a societal standpoint. What makes wizards, well, wizards? What sets them apart and (at least in their own eyes) above other magical beings? It isn't divination; centaurs can do that. It isn't potion-making; hags and goblins can do that. It isn't even the ability to freely reshape the world to their whims through magic; house-elves don't just match in that but laughably outclass them. The difference is the wand, that all-important tool they permit no one else to wield. So what do you call a human girl who claims she has no ability to use a wand and therefore does not deserve the title of 'witch'?

The only word wizardborn have… is Squib.
 
The difference is the wand, that all-important tool they permit no one else to wield. So what do you call a human girl who claims she has no ability to use a wand and therefore does not deserve the title of 'witch'?

The only word wizardborn have… is Squib.
I don't know, enough people had a reaction of "I heard african wizards could do wandless Magic but I've never seen it" to imply they recognize wandless magic as been done by wizards and witches.
Adding to that "Andros the Invincible" has a Chocolate Frog Card and he was famous because he could use wandless Magic.
 
I don't know, enough people had a reaction of "I heard african wizards could do wandless Magic but I've never seen it" to imply they recognize wandless magic as been done by wizards and witches.
Adding to that "Andros the Invincible" has a Chocolate Frog Card and he was famous because he could use wandless Magic.
The thing here is that wandless magic isn't just wandless magic – lots of magic, including literally all magic that isn't done by wizards, doesn't use a wand. Wandless magic is wand-using wizard magic mastered sufficiently well that the wand becomes unnecessary. That's different than a completely separate tradition of magic with different implements and effects.
 
I'm beginning to wonder if Filch is going to try learning her way of doing magic... and whether or not it would work for him.
 
It seems strange to me that an entire village survives on the influx of money from a bunch of students who come by like a plague of locusts probably 9 days out of the year, so I would be more surprised than not that non-Hogwarts students swing by. Just maybe not typically on Hogwarts days.
I'd expect that students that have families might like to occasionally meet up with them during Hogsmeade days. Have lunch together. Hug their little sibling - who might just want to run off and buy some sweets after.

I get why canonically we didn't see that - Harry doesn't have any family to meet up with, Hermione's family would have great difficulty getting to Hogsmeade and Ron... actually, that part doesn't really make sense. Molly is overbearing enough that she's want to check in with her brood. Then again, she also didn't insist that Ron come home for Christmas or winter solstice or whatever the Weasleys may celebrate.
 
I'm beginning to wonder if Filch is going to try learning her way of doing magic... and whether or not it would work for him.
I think it probably wouldn't. It's not like there is actually anything different about Hazel from other wizards from a magical perspective, she's just practicing karate while they use boxing. If Hazel didn't have her staff and wasn't mute she would be able to use wizard wand magic just fine. Filch on the other hand seems to not have magic at all, it's not that he can use a wand it's that he isn't magical in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Molly is overbearing enough that she's want to check in with her brood. Then again, she also didn't insist that Ron come home for Christmas or winter solstice or whatever the Weasleys may celebrate.

Overbearing moms need me time too, or maybe it's a feed back loop? The older kids decide to chill at the castle without a bunch of younger siblings, I can imagine the elder boys really liked being away from the twins. The mom gets more overbearing in response, and by the time the younger kids go to Hogwarts she's the reason they're running away for nine months of the year.
 
Last edited:
I think it probably wouldn't. It's not like there is actually anything different about Hazel from other wizards from a magical perspective, she's just practicing karate while they use boxing. If Hazel didn't have her staff and wasn't mute she would be able to use wizard wand magic just fine. Filch on the other hand seems to not have magic at all, it's not that he can use a wand it's that he isn't magical in the first place.
I thought squibs were at least partially magical.

Otherwise, wouldn't muggle repelling wards affect them?
 
I thought squibs were at least partially magical.

Otherwise, wouldn't muggle repelling wards affect them?
It really depends on what muggle repelling wards target. Does it target a lack of magic? If so squibs should probably be effected. Does it target people who don't know about magic? He's fine. The esoteric concept of muggle? He's fine.

There's also the question of how magic works. Is it a yes, no? Is it a sliding scale? Is it individual talents in different amounts?
 
It really depends on what muggle repelling wards target. Does it target a lack of magic? If so squibs should probably be effected. Does it target people who don't know about magic? He's fine. The esoteric concept of muggle? He's fine.

There's also the question of how magic works. Is it a yes, no? Is it a sliding scale? Is it individual talents in different amounts?
It also seems to be rather unexplored or uncommon knowledge in-universe, which is why Mrs. Figg's testimony about seeing a Dementor was accepted.
 
Back
Top