punster lv1 said:
I don't exactly disagree with your points but technically not hiring someone you think has dark lord potential to teach young and impressionable children skills they could use to campaign on their behalf is not something we should condemn him for.
He then went on to keep Snape on retainer thereby losing the moral high ground but that's a separate issue.
Eh. I'm not sure it
is a separate issue. If he had a good record of looking out for the welfare of the children in his charge, both their safety and their education, I'd be more inclined to think he refused to hire Tom Riddle because of such concerns -- but as it is, it looks to me a lot like he just personally disliked Tom Riddle.
And as for Riddle indoctrinating them or the like, that'd be a risk, true, but it'd be something that'd have to happen under Dumbledore's own nose.
punster lv1 said:
That said he does have an excuse for Lockhart: when you're losing teachers as frequently as he does you probably can't afford to be picky.
That is
an excuse, yes -- but it's a bit undermined by him still being able to get Lupin the year after. And Dumbledore has contacts, or the capacity for having contacts, around the world. He could use the curse as an opportunity to rotate Defense Masters from all the great living magical traditions (or the human ones, at least) of the Earth through on two-semester contracts. Instead, before he even gets to Remus Lupin and Alastor Moody, he's accepting Gilderoy Lockheart, without apparently much of any background checking.
punster lv1 said:
(And, unless it's fanon, it sounds like he can't replace Binns without him passing on first and someone could argue that forcing the issue just to replace a Professor is immoral.)
I'm not sure what the canon state of affairs there might be -- but is Binns still drawing a salary? Even if so, is the school, supposedly one of the finest in the entire wix world, so strapped for cash that having more than a single teacher for History for the entire student body is out of reach?
Isiri Pudireach said:
It is worse because their neighbor was a squib that Dumbledore had placed there to watch them.
Yeeep. I was thinking of that too, but I didn't mention it specifically because, well, it's not as if it was very effective, was it? At least not at what it was ostensibly supposed to be doing.
Isiri Pudireach said:
Though at least for this fic I remember the author saying Hazel never really interacted with her, so she didn't know how bad it was.
Thanks for the reminder.
But yeah, my impression so far is that
this story's Dumbledore is falling down where Hazel is concerned mostly because he's just so busy with other things, and has made some bad assumptions. Which is plausible for many Dumbledores, given how many hats he wears (whether he
should be trying to wear all of those hats at once is arguable, of course...). And we have Word of Author that the local Dumbledore is genuinely well-intentioned; I assume, therefore, that he's going to be quite unhappy with
himself when he finally has the horrible realization of just how badly he failed Hazel.
(Of course, it can also be argued that Hazel ended up better off than she would have with a Mundanely Good Muggle Upbringing -- but there was significant suffering along the way to
get to this point, and Hazel is, I expect, very much not what Dumbledore would have wanted her to be.)
But we'll see how things go. I don't expect Hazel to trust Dumbledore or his close loyalists any time soon, though, and not without justification.
NSMS said:
IIRC it's pretty much outright stated in canon that he knew the Dursleys didn't treat Harry well, and that he in fact suspected in advance he wouldn't exactly be happy there, but also that he valued Harry's safety over that. YMMV on how valid that concern was and how much he actually knew was going on- plus, a reminder that for someone as old as him the threshold for something to be considered 'child abuse' would be rather higher.
Even if one takes the view that he genuinely valued Harry's safety as more than the raw iron from which to forge a Voldemort-killing arrow, though, it seems questionable whether the Dursleys were the best place for it. Yes, blood wards, impressive. Voldemort and his followers
probably can't break those, at least quickly.
Probably none of them are even going to think to try and track down Lily's muggle family. But Harry isn't even as far away as Ireland, he's living with relatives who are connected to his magical parents via publicly available information, and Voldemort is actually notably rather good with magic. If Harry was, say, hidden as Harold John Platte of Hysham, Montana, maybe the wards on him wouldn't be so strong, but so long as he can be shielded from ranged detection, what Death Eater is
ever going to think to look for him
there?
But, okay, maybe there's
no sufficiently reliable way to shield him from long range detection, other than the blood wards. You have a good point about Dumbledore perhaps having different thresholds for child abuse, but even still, the Dursleys are
clearly, or would be clearly to monitoring actually matching the degree of responsibility Dumbledore should have here, treating Harry distinctly worse than Dudley. Why do nothing about that? Even if you don't want to
threaten the Dursleys, how about bribery? Hey, bribe them in part by giving Vernon a "promotion" to somewhere warm, sunny, and expensive, and a nice house there that you just happened to have heavily warded before they arrived to further boost protection on the blood wards.
It seems like there are a variety of valid options that
could have been explored.
shioran toushin said:
No a actual Wizard, nor Witch has actually spent time with her talking about the history and Nature of Magic
No, it's worse than that, as I understand it, where trusting adult wand-wavers is concerned: people
have talked with her about that, some. And a fair bit of what that talking was composed of was either astonishment at the very-un-wand-waver-like things Hazel does, or flat denial that she can do things she very well knows she can.
Silently Watches said:
Will she ever care about the opinions of wand-wavers as a society?
…Not sure because that depends on the muse, but all signs currently point to no.
Yeah, I think that's basically been key to my feelings on her interactions with Hogwarts so far. I'm a bit nervous she doesn't have a way to teleport out of the wards yet, but house elves appear to provide a potential avenue there; hopefully she figures that out soon, but she
does have significant in-character motivation for making sure he has an exit method.
Once that's sorted? Say things completely fall apart for her in Hogwarts. Her likely response, I expect?
Along the lines of a shrug and "Oh well".
She's not, IIRC, even been to the Iberian Peninsula yet, much less Africa, India, China, the Americas...
Now, I know, out of universe, that the plan is to have her stick around Hogwarts and Wix Britain for quite some time. But that still doesn't change the fact that the
stakes for making things work with Hogwarts just don't feel that high. For Hazel, it's a resource, one it'd be a pity to lose, but it's one of very,
very many; there's a whole world out there! And even if she decides she needs information that can only be found in Wix Britain, eh, wait a few years, get stronger and more knowledgeable, and come back.
Would her just deciding to leave for a decade cause
other characters major issues? Oh yes. But they're not the main viewpoint character here.
So if it takes Hazel a while to work things out with the adult wand-wavers here? Eh. If she never does? Eh. Can she get away from them if they're a threat? If so, no problem.
The
important thing, after her own safety, is her own quest for knowledge -- and that's so far been proceeding pretty nicely, it seems like, for how long it's been.
NSMS said:
The impression I've gotten of Hazel, meanwhile, is that she seems to be thinking that there are two (or more) distinct types of magical power humans can have. So if you have power source type A then you're a witch/wizard and can use that sort of magic, if you have type B then you're a druid and can use that sort of magic, and if you can have both you can use both sorts of magic- but they still remain distinct and separate from one another.
Where are the system boundaries drawn between "distinct types" of magic, though? Why should the distinction between witch/wizard magic and "druid" magic be less real than the distinction between human magic and hag magic, or goblin? After all, why deny wands to nonhumans via the law unless those nonhumans could
use them? And Hazel's "human magic" overlapped enough with what was thought to be exclusively hag magic that that was confusion about her biology.
ccstat said:
I doubt it will come to that, but I expect the ripples of this through the spirit community will not be predominantly positive for Hazel.
Well, maybe. On the other hand, she's hardly been going around attacking spirits
unprovoked, even when she's been visibly-to-them afraid of their presence. They might well think what she did to Peeves was
disproportionate, but that's still a good ways from thinking that she's actively hunting them or something.
Moreover,
that she did what she did to Peeves, with its attendant questions of "Why?" and "How?" seems like it might produce some curiosity among the other spirits. Cautious curiosity, certainly -- but if someone's demonstrably not attacked when not provoked but disproportionately attacked
when provoked, might that not provide
more, rather than less, motivation for opening a dialogue to try and clear things up and sort them out?
Silently Watches said:
Meanwhile wizards claim that intentional magic without using a wand isn't possible
Well, except, IIRC, for
super high-end stuff. But that still leads to the conclusion that either a: Lily was actually on par with people like Dumbledore and Voldemort, which is itself pretty exceptional, and this isn't being acknowledged, or b: Lily was doing something that didn't fit with what the rules were
supposed to be.
(Oh, though I suppose there are some
forms of magic, like potions, that are exceptions, but those aren't really what's under discussion here.)
Also, I hope your headache is better or gets better soon.