I suppose a lot will depend on whether anyone tells Dumbledore enough to make him take a more personal interest in Hazel's situation.

That said, Potions class should be interesting.
 
Well, wizarding education remains utterly awful! Literally every single subject other than Herbology has led to Hazel having to invent her own ways to do things, no?

While undoubtedly a way to stretch one's magic skills, it's telling that only one class has actually been able to teach her rather than force her to teach herself (and do so far faster than is sensible).

Her inability to understand the house point system is... interesting, although it doesn't quite make sense to me. It's obviously supposed to speak to her immature individualism, but I feel that at least her experience with, say, the werewolves should have taught her about group benefit and detriment.
Group benefit isn't the problem here, it's depersonalized benefit which makes it hard to stay invested in on the group's behalf. There is 4 houses in a whole school separated also by grade level 6 out of 7 people you aren't going to to see in the classes where the points are mostly being handed out. Which depersonalizes the experiences so much that why would you care about points given out in academic context. Someone answers a question fantastically? Who cares? It's not like you were there. It's kind of like those school wide fundraisers, they had to subdivide down to the class level with a promise of a possible pizza party before you would care at all.
 
Ah, good ol' Zacharias Smith, staying true to his usual characterization of making things worse for everybody. Some things never change, eh wot?

The emphasis on house points this chapter is interesting; Hazel (bohemian wanderer that she is) doesn't grok how the points system is meant to help instill tribal gang house loyalty in the members, and at this point doesn't seem to be worrying overmuch about them. I wonder, if this goes on for much longer, how Hufflepuff will deal with somebody who's apparently a habitual rulebreaker who keeps costing them points? Loyalty is a two-way road, after all.

So, the whole Peeves bit. Two things stand out in my mind; first, Sally-Anne's reaction to the word "cleansed" has me adding two and two and coming up with a solution of MURDER. Or at the very least I have a sinking feeling that Grievous Bodily Harm[tm] may need to be inflicted upon somebody within the Perkes' family circle. Second, Peeves himself might be more eldritch than first blush, and is vulnerable to getting shanked like a bitch. Which is useful information and will no doubt have interesting repercussions down the line.

Last but not least, it would seem that the answer to "how will Hazel get into the Hufflepuff dorms if she can't say the password?" is "lol fuck you." Honestly, the one good reason Hazel has to stick around is the free food, otherwise she'd be better off raiding the British Museum for stolen magical artifacts.
 
Regarding Hazel not telling McGonagall about Olivander's words, well... she's being chewed out by her teacher, publically humiliated in front of her class mates, in a situation where she's at a disadvantage because she's gotta think about what she wants to say before she can write it in the air... and she's eleven. Her being eleven should make the argument moot, but it's all these factors--I feel--crossed over with whatever motivation the writer wants to give: she's scared McGonagall would want her staff broken in favour of a wand, or her brain just stalled unhelpfully, or she decided to talk to McGonagall (or Sprout) after about it. I'd argue that there's also a side of Hazel struggling to understand the Wizarding World while the Wizarding World refuses to accomidate for her -- McGonagall, for example, decides to assume that Hazel just didn't want to get a wand, or something to that effect, instead of investigating the matter properly. She's being an adult, assuming she knows best and acting like she does, even if she has no idea what's actually the matter.

Honestly, I love seeing how her age and experiences just conflict with the narrative at hand. Her just floundering with McGonagall and being baffled by Snape are very much realistic to me.
 
As far as I can tell this...isn't all that unusual for british boarding school education of the era?
Yup. Strict adherence to an already ancient set of rules of decorum. Looking back on this from our lofty vantage of 2022 it seems pretty horrible, but a british boarding school of the 1900's, run by wand wavers who mostly act like its still the dark ages, this treatment shouldnt be suprising.
 
Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Ableism, come for the tribalism, stay because you're a muggleborn and the system degrades your relationship to the muggle world leaving you trapped in a society that will never accept you as your ability to connect with your home fades with every passing year.
I think they must move her to gryffindor.A portrait can see her writting.
Rather, I think the author mentioned that some alterations had been made to Ravenclaw and Gryffindor to permit entry. So, yes, it is possible to change the house entry requirements. They just didn't do it because, rather than make the entirety of Hogwarts accessible, McGonagall only focused on informing houses she felt Hazel could get into the ones Hazel can get into.
 
....ok I have a question, why didn't she try to use the staff in transfiguration? Shouldn't that be her go to tool for anything she hasn't figured out a slicker method for? There's a lot of weight placed on that staff, why isn't she trying to leverage it?
 
....ok I have a question, why didn't she try to use the staff in transfiguration? Shouldn't that be her go to tool for anything she hasn't figured out a slicker method for? There's a lot of weight placed on that staff, why isn't she trying to leverage it?

I don't think she's figured out how to use her staff in that way yet. If I recall, she hasn't actually used it for anything magical.
 
....ok I have a question, why didn't she try to use the staff in transfiguration? Shouldn't that be her go to tool for anything she hasn't figured out a slicker method for? There's a lot of weight placed on that staff, why isn't she trying to leverage it?
I think Hazel realized that perfectly replicating the tiny wand movements McGonagall described with a six foot staff wasn't gonna happen
 
It's going to be... extremely problematic to punish Hazel through most conventional means.

She doesn't care about House Points, she doesn't care about peer pressure, she's completely self-sufficient and carries all her belongings with her at all times, she can just choose not to show up for detentions, she doesn't actually care about passing courses just acquiring knowledge, she doesn't have parents or guardians to exercise control over her, and she can move about under her own power internationally. It remains to be seen whether her 'doorway' trick can bypass the wards entirely or not, but it's pathetically easy to get off the school grounds if you feel the need to.

I think it's very likely that Hazel just gets fed up with classes at some point and disappears for a week or two in order to do something productive with her time.

I mean, what are the staff going to do? Expel her? Dumbledore would sooner fire Snape.
 
Hazel (bohemian wanderer that she is) doesn't grok how the points system is meant to help instill tribal gang house loyalty in the members, and at this point doesn't seem to be worrying overmuch about them.

Except the Hogwarts House Point system reinforces the negative loyalty aspects far more than the positive ones. "If you keep making trouble for us Potter, we'll do bad things to you." Squib firstie bitch

<I have no idea what you people think I'm doing wrong!>
 
I assumed there would be a reward or something for the person who had the most points, but done this way there isn't any reason for anyone to do any better or worse than they already would have. They don't matter.
Hazelhugs. I am sure that you will someday understand the concept of turning the student body against one another over the big shiny maguffin, but you may be happier not...
This one broke against the head of Wayne Hopkins, a dark-haired boy who had been visibley reluctant to get his hands dirty with the rainbow roses.
I suspect that this sentence is in an unintended state, although Wayne could be "head" as a title? but wouldn't that be capitalised? meh...
the one good reason Hazel has to stick around is the free food
I would not underestimate the value of free food to someone who often has to go without...
I don't think she's figured out how to use her staff in that way yet. If I recall, she hasn't actually used it for anything magical.
I was more thinking that she would use an imaginary staff, on the basis that "wands do it, but wands are not for me, and my staff is what I have instead of a wand". She was looking for something whose identity would suit the purpose that a wand had.

Other alternatives she could look into are the places where she made deals with spirits, or possibly something to do with potions. A cauldron probably sees about as many alterations as most transfigurists...
 
Ah, always a treat to see this update!

As for tools, I'd base it on the material she wants to turn things into. For a steel needle think of it as forging the wood into the metal needle she wants with a hammer for example.
 
If I recall correctly the Great Hall get's the colors of the winning house for the last meal of the school year, and also bragging rights.

More than one story (usually by an American author) has pointed out that this seems, lackluster considering the amount of effort it takes to keep said points and how everyone acts about it.

I'm not sure how the Brits who's school system was the basis for the 4 Houses see it mind you. They might find it perfectly ordinary.
Can't speak for people who've gone to boarding schools, but I don't recall having anything like the house points system. Which means we either didn't have one, or we did but absolutely nobody cared about it.

Also, quick question: is Hazel's magic actually different from witches/wizards at a base level, or is it the same but she just learned to use it differently due to being self-taught and then assumed that means she's not really a witch? I've been assuming the latter, but I'm curious if there's been any WoG on the topic.
 
What kind of tool was capable of turning one thing into another?
And there it is, something I've been expecting to happen ever since she picked up the tool method way back at the start of the journey. Imaginary tools are convenient in that they're highly intuitive and well-defined, but they also constrain her greatly since a lot of effects her magic could theoretically produce just aren't supported by these mental constructs.

I wonder if it'd occur to her to turn to language for new symbols that support abstractions and generalizations properly. Not sure she'd think of it with her hands-on life experience and no education, and if she does, retraining would likely be painfully hard, too. It's kind of lame that odds of professors helping are slim, too - Flitwick's the only one I can see diving into the underpinnings of an unorthodox casting style like that, but will he reach out enough if Hazel herself doesn't?
 
Last edited:
I, for one, am looking forward to the wizarding world's slow realization that Hazel Potter isn't at all what they expected and is, in fact, capable of doing things they'd never even thought of doing all while being nearly incapable of things they take for granted. The inevitable xenophobia isn't going to be fun, of course, but the inevitable comeuppance when they realize that she's capable of Great and Terrible Things will be wonderful.
 
A weaving type of tool might work for transfiguration? Weaving the magic into shape, unspooling the nature of one thing only to rethread it into another.
Be the Rumpelstiltskin that spun straw into gold!
The first item is even a sewing needle.
 
Placing her hand flat against the middle barrel in the second row from the bottom, she told it, I want to go to bed.

Other people getting into the common room had used those words or words much like them before, and those people had been let inside. For her, however, the barrel did nothing.
Not sure if anyone else pointed this out; the problem may not be that she can't speak.

The problem may be that she's lying.

After all, Hazel does not want to go to bed. She hates the beds, she sleeps on the floor. She's copied that phrasing from other students - but it isn't true for her.

Of course, maybe magic isn't too hung up on technicalities like this, and it is the obvious issue that she can't speak.
 
Not sure if anyone else pointed this out; the problem may not be that she can't speak.

The problem may be that she's lying.

After all, Hazel does not want to go to bed. She hates the beds, she sleeps on the floor. She's copied that phrasing from other students - but it isn't true for her.

Of course, maybe magic isn't too hung up on technicalities like this, and it is the obvious issue that she can't speak.
I like the idea, but I'm pretty sure it's not the problem. After all, she can't be the first person to return to her common room while not wanting to go to bed, and I think it would be a problem if students would get locked out whenever they were feeling too excited to sleep.
 
Not sure if anyone else pointed this out; the problem may not be that she can't speak.

The problem may be that she's lying.

After all, Hazel does not want to go to bed. She hates the beds, she sleeps on the floor. She's copied that phrasing from other students - but it isn't true for her.

Of course, maybe magic isn't too hung up on technicalities like this, and it is the obvious issue that she can't speak.
But is it a lie if she believes she is telling the truth because she knows what she means? It's most likely a spell that senses honesty and intentions via speech rather than someone installing 'proper' grammar into a barrel that's presumably been around since people spoke like a Shakespearean play.

I like the idea, but I'm pretty sure it's not the problem. After all, she can't be the first person to return to her common room while not wanting to go to bed, and I think it would be a problem if students would get locked out whenever they were feeling too excited to sleep.
They could always just say 'I want to get into the common room', or specifically 'my house common room' and still be telling the truth though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top