Well, I guess I commend you for trying to experiment with the medium. It's certainly a neat idea in principle.
That said, you may notice I don't sound very enthused. Frankly, I think you failed in the execution. Like, my first instinctual, emotional reaction was 'That's so pretentious', and I think I have above average tolerance for pretentiousness. Also, the setup with the 'I don't know anymore' post was problematic, because at that point my interest tanked. I don't think that's the intended experience.
Also, unless you have some deeper/more meta level incorporation that explanation, it feels too early. That's the sort of thing you post after the story is over, not straight after the introduction. Seriously, that's like revealing the murderer at the end of the second chapter. It's weird. Mind, I might well have stopped reading before that point, so it might've been a good idea after all.
Finally, I want to repeat that I really do appreciate the intention. I want to like this more than I do. I hope this feedback helps in future works.
I do appreciate the feedback. I knew it was going to be problematic for some readers. My intention was to have the two tracks running in parallel, so those who didn't want to engage with the meta-nonsense wouldn't have to.
You may well be right about the timing of the resignation letter. I don't know, this is my first time trying something like this, and like I said, it's largely improvisational. The meta-narrative part is taking a back seat from here on out, although I doubt it will ever really go away.
If you're enjoying the other storyline, feel free to skip the other bullshit.
And thanks again for your honest, considerate criticism.
Oh, one final bit of the meta explanation. This one is a bit philosophical, and it really is something I do actually struggle with personally.
Stories are bullshit.
Narrative itself is an artificial abstraction, the shapes of which are designed to lie to us about the real nature of reality.
We create these things for lots of reasons- to teach lessons, to try to understand our own motivations, to find a way to move through the world a little easier.
Each one of us is building a story about ourselves all the time. And none of them are true. They're all colored by wishful thinking and self-delusion and self-distraction.
And death is the thing that cuts right through it.
That's what the Taylor/Emma scene is about.
And I'm sorry if that sounds pretentious. It probably is. I'm a pretty pretentious person.
But this is a serious issue for me philosophically, and it's one I've never found a satisfactory answer for, and part of this exercise was to try to work through some of these ideas in an entertaining way.
I'm sure I could have done a better job than I have. This is a first draft after all.
But if this exercise has had some value for anyone, if it has made someone think about things they wouldn't have otherwise, then it was a better use of my time this past week than watching Netflix and eating ice cream
Which is what I would've been doing otherwise.