And having a transport that cannot transport many, a combat vehicle that cannot eliminate tanks[X] Plan Babby's First IFV
It's better to avoid being too ambitious.
we... wee're gonna have to take away some metal bawkses
As well as how easy is it to repair and maintan each of them? Not to mention what ammo and conditions can they work through? As well as be Amphibious? Can they survive under simple test fire?
Entrant | Propulsion | Powertrain | Armor Front | Other Armor | Amphibious | Weapons | CBRN | Weight | Dismounts |
Elizade Automotive | 3 axle truck | 3l V8 | 8mm rolled steel, 10mm spacer | 4mm rolled | Snorkel | Smg.62 (HMG) (40° arc) | Crew cab, charcoal filters | 8.5t | 11 (rear exit) |
Irizar Bus Works | Tracked | 4l 5cyl opposed-piston electric transmission | 20mm | 12mm | Snorkel, buddy-power | Slk.82 (2cm) x2, Slk.69, pintle machine gun | Entire vehicle, overpressurization | 13.75 | 11, rear exit |
L'Osseau, Galaceia division | 2 axle truck | 4l I6 | 6mm (+6mm engine) | 3mm | No | Kubachin Warrl HMG 88mm mortar or 75mm gun in exchange for dismounts | Sealed, no measures | 5t | 6 |
Ghermain Brothers Auto Galaceia group | Tracks | 5l Boxer-4 | 20mm | 8mm | Snorkel and pray | Pintle mount machine gun (not included) | Charcoal filters | 6.5 | 12 |
I dunno, theSo, looking at that handy chart, right now the Irizar entry looks like the winner already. Testing it first seems best.
I like the Irizar mostly because it's fully filtered and overpressurized. And hope that there's a ton or two to be shaved off if we go down to a single Slk.82 and the pintle gun.I dunno, theMEHTAL BAWKSESGhermain Brothers Auto Galaceia group can do most of the same at half the weight.
If it's the same Ghermaine from 3/2, then it might have tiny issues like everyone needing to be smaller than 170cm or something like that. Last time, they couldn't into ergonomics.The Ghermain can actually add some weight (which boggles the mind with that kind of armor) for some better weapons and fording.
Slipped into the second paragraph.@Winged_One² , where did you get that the Elizade needs buddy power for it's fording?
I agree with thisIrizar and GB both looks like promising options. The L'Osseau entry strikes me as more of a mortar carrier than battle taxi or IFV - maybe something for a future project, but we want to move madlads here, so it's a maybe but not hugely appealing. Maybe an initial round of testing - endurance, on- and off-road performance, dig up some troops and do mount/dismount tests, and then filter more finely from there?
Irizar and GB both looks like promising options. The L'Osseau entry strikes me as more of a mortar carrier than battle taxi or IFV - maybe something for a future project, but we want to move madlads here, so it's a maybe but not hugely appealing. Maybe an initial round of testing - endurance, on- and off-road performance, dig up some troops and do mount/dismount tests, and then filter more finely from there?
How about a , I don't know, a basic endurance test? Drive em around for 4000 miles and record how often they break down and how long it takes to fix em. Better have em follow the same path as well. Also, wasn't one of our requirements being able to fit traincars?
So, looking at that handy chart, right now the Irizar entry looks like the winner already. Testing it first seems best.
If it's the same Ghermaine from 3/2, then it might have tiny issues like everyone needing to be smaller than 170cm or something like that. Last time, they couldn't into ergonomics.
The Elizade can use some of it's spare space for a fourth axle for redundancy and better terrain tolerance, better CRBN, and maybe expanded weaponry (traverse, and possibly gunner protection and a coaxial grenade launcher for fire support and smoke screens, especially the latter being important for some extra protection with it's light armor). Important question though: It does use solid rubber tires, and not pressurized ones, right?