- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
If the number is 'people being honored get half a year's pay,' then honoring legionnaires adds up pretty fast.
Assuming there were a combination of about 50-60 men who participated in Mercator's charge and Titus's arson combined, then to give them all honors would cost about one talent (that is to say, each man gets the equivalent of, oh, twenty thousand dollars or something like that, combining to somewhere in the neighborhood of a million).
Now, the loot, counting only gold and valuables measured in talents, is about 24.5 talents. If we divvy up an extra talent among a group of men who consist of roughly 10% of the cohort (that is, 50-60 men, as estimated above), then in effect we're giving them an extra share of the pay that amounts to, um... I don't actually know how the Romans normally divide up loot, but it'd be something like giving them an extra share of the loot. Maybe 50% more or twice as much as they'd normally get.
This seems... reasonably fair. Most of the Romans who fought in the battle are going to agree that the men who fought with Mercator and Titus did enough to save and help their fellow Romans that a double share of the loot is not unwarranted. Furthermore, if we have to detail men to perform special duties in the future, it will give them an incentive to volunteer, and to fight bravely, because they know they stand to receive honors if they perform their duties conspicuously well.
Then we'd be splitting up another talent worth of loot between Mercator, Titus, and Maximinus. I'd seriously consider rewarding Tercerus for a job well done, and if he weren't our servant I'd be strongly in favor of it. As it stands, I can go either way on rewarding Tercerus.
Either way, the money earmarked for honors would be about 10% of the total, so the rest of the legion is 'only' getting about 10% less than they otherwise would, which would hopefully feel fair-ish to them as well as to me.
Of course, it is now April and that's a while from now.
Assuming there were a combination of about 50-60 men who participated in Mercator's charge and Titus's arson combined, then to give them all honors would cost about one talent (that is to say, each man gets the equivalent of, oh, twenty thousand dollars or something like that, combining to somewhere in the neighborhood of a million).
Now, the loot, counting only gold and valuables measured in talents, is about 24.5 talents. If we divvy up an extra talent among a group of men who consist of roughly 10% of the cohort (that is, 50-60 men, as estimated above), then in effect we're giving them an extra share of the pay that amounts to, um... I don't actually know how the Romans normally divide up loot, but it'd be something like giving them an extra share of the loot. Maybe 50% more or twice as much as they'd normally get.
This seems... reasonably fair. Most of the Romans who fought in the battle are going to agree that the men who fought with Mercator and Titus did enough to save and help their fellow Romans that a double share of the loot is not unwarranted. Furthermore, if we have to detail men to perform special duties in the future, it will give them an incentive to volunteer, and to fight bravely, because they know they stand to receive honors if they perform their duties conspicuously well.
Then we'd be splitting up another talent worth of loot between Mercator, Titus, and Maximinus. I'd seriously consider rewarding Tercerus for a job well done, and if he weren't our servant I'd be strongly in favor of it. As it stands, I can go either way on rewarding Tercerus.
Either way, the money earmarked for honors would be about 10% of the total, so the rest of the legion is 'only' getting about 10% less than they otherwise would, which would hopefully feel fair-ish to them as well as to me.
We could maybe arrange for Tercopholes to be the October Horse, sacrificed to Mars? It'd be a good way to raise our social profile a bit in Rome.Perhaps we should also sacrifice one of our gifts to the gods?
Of course, it is now April and that's a while from now.
Last edited: