I'm still trying to get a grip on where "there shouldn't be punishment for this" is coming from.

I agree that Atellus doesn't have standing to admonish the legion for acting immorally, but that isn't even what the leading option ("Discipline") is about.

It's about, well, discipline. If the legate commanding the legion says "halt," then you halt.
 
I want to point out to folks that the last time there was a Rome Quest where people were cheering on war-crimes, it did not end well for them.
 
I'm still trying to get a grip on where "there shouldn't be punishment for this" is coming from.

I agree that Atellus doesn't have standing to admonish the legion for acting immorally, but that isn't even what the leading option ("Discipline") is about.

It's about, well, discipline. If the legate commanding the legion says "halt," then you halt.

It is upon Sertorius to do the punishment not us, if we do this legion will know who stood behind this and we will lose standing we tried to build.
 
[X] Plan Optimat Politics
-[X] Write-In: Discipline. It is said soldiers ignored Sertorius and his officers' commands to cease during the sack. There must be a punishment for such insubordination. You have the pay of all men who ignored orders heavily docked. Gold speaks louder than blood.
-[X] Write-In: Memorial. Have a stone monument erected outside the ruins of Nola, with an inscription in large letters, high enough off the ground that a man cannot easily reach it. "Here stood the city of Nola, spurning the outstretched hand of Rome. Here came the sword of Rome, in the year of Flaccus and Marius. Here fell the city of Nola."
-[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
-[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
-[X] Make Connections: Ever aloof and arrogant, the aristocrats of the equtii, the knights of Rome, have come to respect you as a leader to look up to over the course of this campaign. You could try to make some deeper connections that might serve you well in the city.
 
For starters, they are a conquered people trying to resist. I doubt even Atellus would label them "traitors".

However, the monument is something personal. It's on the one hand an obvious warning, but at the same time also a promise for those who seek a future within Rome. It specifically alludes to Atellus' now famous speech to the Pentri about our stick and carrot strategy here in Samnium. Those who resist will feel the whole might of Rome, but those who don't, Bovianum and the Hirpini for example, those are rewarded and protected.
It can also serve as a sort of gravestone (as it even mentions the year the city was razed) and feels like giving the dead some due/Atellus showing a little bit of regret and respect (we shouldn't forget that there weren't just Samnite warriors in the city, but also Roman citizens imprisoned with them. And Romans don't tend to think about celebrating killing fellow Romans during this age).

I will add this here

But the last option is the most promising -- and the most excessive. He could conduct a campaign of extermination, a move supported by many in Rome. He could drive the Samnite armies into the sea, he could burn their cities and raze their towns. Their statues, their works of art, their people and their culture would be swallowed up forever by the might of Rome. Those civilians and common people left would either be sold into slavery or broken up and divided into the general Roman population -- in a word, the Samnite would share the fate of the Carthaginian and the Macedonian before him.

Most importantly, however, the Samnite lands, newly cleared, would be free for settlement by the legion, a move for which Sertorius and his supporters in Rome could lobby. If successful, it would forever tie the men of the Sixth Legion -- and their sons, and their son's sons -- to Sertorius, the great general who gave them land and wealth, providing a permanent powerbase for Sertorius, his descendants, and their allies.
 
So, for punishment (decimation is definitely out and fining the whole legion is not going to go over well) speaks as far as I'm concerned
  • Atellus is doing something about what happened
  • Sertorius suffered an enormous loss of face and we can try to salvage the situation, maybe raising his opinion of us
  • The senior commanders seeing us pull this off will likely make them respect us a lot, and those are the men with connections
On the other hand
  • Resentment obviously, this wasn't even a full year of our 10 year service and we'll be around for a while
  • These men will be voting in the future, and we want to be elected
  • We can suffer a loss of face if we fail
Everyone can decide for himself if he thinks the risk is worth it.
I will add this here
And? We voted for the Social War, not the heavy handed Sulla strategy.
 
Last edited:
ancient historian Livy
Who?

It been 2 months of siege. I doubt they would have shared food with prisoners.

Options include "fine the legionnaires for disobeying orders" and "put up a stone monument saying that this is where Nola used to be and what happened to it," though those are both write-ins I came up with. As you see, the plan I vote for above contains them.
I would vote the memorial but like I said I'm against punishing the legion. Maybe ask the creator of Vae Victis to add it in but I'm unsure since doing nothing is incompatible I think. That's just the rule though, OP should understand what the vote means.
 
Inserted tally
Adhoc vote count started by Ancient Scholar on Jul 10, 2019 at 6:48 PM, finished with 144 posts and 21 votes.

  • [X] Plan Vae Victis
    -[x] Nothing: To the victor go the spoils. So it has always been. So it will always be. (Incompatible with any other choice)
    -[X] Make Connections: Ever aloof and arrogant, the aristocrats of the equtii, the knights of Rome, have come to respect you as a leader to look up to over the course of this campaign. You could try to make some deeper connections that might serve you well in the city.
    -[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
    -[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
    [X] Plan Optimat Politics
    -[X] Write-In: Discipline. It is said soldiers ignored Sertorius and his officers' commands to cease during the sack. There must be a punishment for such insubordination. You have the pay of all men who ignored orders heavily docked. Gold speaks louder than blood.
    -[X] Write-In: Memorial. Have a stone monument erected outside the ruins of Nola, with an inscription in large letters, high enough off the ground that a man cannot easily reach it. "Here stood the city of Nola, spurning the outstretched hand of Rome. Here came the sword of Rome, in the year of Flaccus and Marius. Here fell the city of Nola."
    -[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
    -[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
    -[X] Make Connections: Ever aloof and arrogant, the aristocrats of the equtii, the knights of Rome, have come to respect you as a leader to look up to over the course of this campaign. You could try to make some deeper connections that might serve you well in the city.
    [X] Plan Nuttius Maximus
    -[X] Example: Sertorius is wrong. This is an example. A living example. You have the elders of the surrounding towns rounded up and brought to Nola, where they are forced to look upon the ruins of one of the mightiest cities of Campania.
    -[X] Celebration: Half a hundred amphoras of wine were found under the governor's home. Rome has come up against her foes and triumphed. What better cause for celebration?
    -[X] Prospects: While you cannot court anyone or get married now, Proserpina's latest comment has sparked thoughts of marriage in your head. You can't do much here and now, but you could have Proserpina write up a list of the best prospects and send them to you for you to look over. Should you like any of them in particular, you could even write to her father to gauge his interest.
    -[X] Fortune's Favor: After camp is made for the night, several of the officers, including Carcellus, gather to gamble and game. These men are all fast friends, with ties stretching back years, but if if you integrated yourself with them and got them to consider you one of them, it would go a long way towards improving your standing in the legion.
    -[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
    [X] Plan Whip for disobedient
    -[X] Write-in: Admonishment for disobedience:An army should control itself. A Roman army should know better than to sack a city ostensibly meant to be Roman, disregarding their orders to stop. You have the worst offenders from each cohort, those who ignored their orders for longest and most severely, selected and flogged. It will not win you any love, but it may teach them a lesson of discipline and obedience.
    -[X] Write-In: Memorial. Have a stone monument erected outside the ruins of Nola, with an inscription in large letters, high enough off the ground that a man cannot easily reach it. "Here stood the city of Nola, spurning the outstretched hand of Rome. Here came the sword of Rome, in the year of Flaccus and Marius. Here fell the city of Nola."
    -[X] Drum Up Support: You attempt to solidify the men's idea of you as someone they follow and support. They love you already, but having a solid voting bloc in future elections might prove very useful.
    -[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
    -[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
 
It is upon Sertorius to do the punishment not us, if we do this legion will know who stood behind this and we will lose standing we tried to build.
To this point that people seem to be making, I'd like to quote the text above the voting options:
You could not stop it from happening, but you might affect what happens after. Sertorius is withdrawn -- angry, perhaps, or something else -- and your judgement may well be law as far as the men are concerned. Speak, Tribune, and see it done.
Sertorious is withdrawn, for whatever reason we don't know as of yet, but what this does mean is that we as Legion's Broad Striped Tribune are in charge of cleaning the aftermath of the Sack. The notion that it's Sertorious responsibility is without merit, we're his second in command, it's our role as tribune to take command when our commander is indisposed for whatever reason, injury or whatever it may be that is our job.

Initiative is important, especially in Roman society, and in Attelus character growth. How we define Attelus character in this quest is through our choices of his actions, it's the beautiful thing about this medium. The question arises to us now as players, how does Attelus deal with the breaking of Roman discipline in the aftermath of the Sack of Nola? Does he give into indifference and exhaustion? Do we then play him as a young man, driven to exhaustion by this brutal experience or do we take a more interesting path?

Do we embrace that idealism that we had Attelus display in the earlier chapters, that brilliance and passion for his home and the institutions that make it. Punishing the disobedient soldiers, reinforcing military discipline while erecting a monument there to mark Nola, a land marker we could possibly interact with in later stages of the quest such as Third Servile War. Establishing that the men are soldiers of Rome, they do not break discipline and rampage like a horde of bandits. Punishing them in a way that both educates and admonishes the disobedient men.

Loss of popularity I'd argue isn't really a major factor. The fact that neither of the major plans fully capitalises upon that popularity by turning that into a solid voting bloc renders that argument moot.

@Telamon My flair for dramatics would love to see Attelus give a speech to the men in the aftermath, any chance for this? Or would we have to include that in the voting options?
 
Last edited:
@Telamon I've got a quick question, did our father have a political marriage? Was Attelus' mom the daughter of a senator? If so, can we establish connections with our maternal grandfather or uncle?
 
[X] Plan Optimat Politics
-[X] Write-In: Discipline. It is said soldiers ignored Sertorius and his officers' commands to cease during the sack. There must be a punishment for such insubordination. You have the pay of all men who ignored orders heavily docked. Gold speaks louder than blood.
-[X] Write-In: Memorial. Have a stone monument erected outside the ruins of Nola, with an inscription in large letters, high enough off the ground that a man cannot easily reach it. "Here stood the city of Nola, spurning the outstretched hand of Rome. Here came the sword of Rome, in the year of Flaccus and Marius. Here fell the city of Nola."
-[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
-[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
-[X] Make Connections: Ever aloof and arrogant, the aristocrats of the equtii, the knights of Rome, have come to respect you as a leader to look up to over the course of this campaign. You could try to make some deeper connections that might serve you well in the city.

...The Sixth Legion killed thousands of people, many of them unarmed, at least some of them nonhostile, some of them children.

Do you really think it's time for a party, or are you just trolling?

The Camp Prefect, in the context of this particular legion at least, seems to be serving as a combination of logistics officer and senior-most NCO. He's not going to make a disciplinary decision this important on his own. Sertorius is in a brown study and won't.

The bare fact that we can make such a decision is an argument that we should.

Do you consider it hypocritical to punish the troops for disobeying Sertorius' orders?

If he commanded them to stop, and they didn't, then that's important.

If he commanded Atellus to stop, and he didn't, then Atellus should forfeit a share of his loot consistent with the share lost by the troops being fined.

That's why my preferred plan(s) revolve around fining the men, not beating them or berating them for massacring the city. I'm trying to make the narrative around this "Sertorius told you to stop, and you didn't, and that's wrong." I don't consider that hypocritical, especially since if it applies to Atellus I for one am going to vote in favor of him giving up an appropriate share of his loot from the campaign.

I'll ask you what I asked @skaro .

Do you like where this goes if we decide that the total destruction of a Roman city that had been occupied by rebels is grounds for celebration?

Wait. Did you just call the ancient historian Livy "PC" and "forcing modern morality onto our character?"

Look, as I've discussed above, I think there is a lot of room here to register that in-character Atellus thinks something wrong just happened, even WITHOUT the ultimate and unforgivable sins of "being PC" or "forcing modern morality onto our character."

What I don't understand is what makes you so eager to not have Atellus think that something wrong just happened.

Humbly, I think the underlined passage in your quote takes it a little far.

SHOULD have?

We have two free actions we can take regarding how we respond to the sacking of the city. They do not consume resources from the action economy of three personal actions we can take.

Options include "fine the legionnaires for disobeying orders" and "put up a stone monument saying that this is where Nola used to be and what happened to it," though those are both write-ins I came up with. As you see, the plan I vote for above contains them.

We should celebrate. It has been a long and hard campaign and we have discovered wine that will otherwise be selfishly sold off at a profit when we reach Rome. Instead of allowing such a disaster to happen we should use the wine while we have it and earn the love of our men with our generosity and kindness.
 
You know, re-reading it, I almost wonder if the issue isn't that Atellus was leading the berserk sack against orders--
You do not remember much of that day, afterwards. You remember the cold morning in Sertorius' tent, your breath misting as he explained in a sharp tone that the Senate had recalled his legion, that they did not think Nola a threat any longer, that they ordered him to return to Rome. You remember the look in his eyes as you realized that some part of him hated this city, too.

You remember Mercator's hushed warning -- "They will not stop." -- and Sertorius' silence that was his answer. You remember the order -- you remember giving it as it fell from your lips. You remember the wolves' eyes glinting as the ladders were raised, as the siege engines rolled forward.
The Senate ordered us to return, because Nola wasn't considered a threat. Then Atellus gave the order to assault and sack the city.
You find Sertorius where the gates of the city once stood, his blood-red cloak fluttering in the wind. His single eye surveys the wreck with an emotion you cannot quite fix, and there is an odd look upon his weathered face.

When he sees you, he at first says nothing, but instead stoops deep and runs a finger through the thick black ash coating the earth.
The legatus claps you on your shoulder as he turns away. "Have no fear, Atellus. You will see just reward for your deeds in the capture of the city. I will make special note of you to the Senate. Someday, you may burn cities yourself."
The Senate had ordered us to return and implicitly ordered us to spare Nola. Atellus then lead the devastation of the city. Looking at what was written, it is entirely possible that Atellus was the one who went counter to orders, and the reason why Sertorius is acting so strangely is because rather than stringing us up for violating his orders to stop, he's going to act as though he had given the order to sack the city and some of the men got carried away.

@Telamon
Is this something that's intended to be a question, or am I just reading into things that aren't there?
 
I want to point out to folks that the last time there was a Rome Quest where people were cheering on war-crimes, it did not end well for them.
Hopefully we can nip it in the bud this time. Thankfully we can trust our QM not to be complicit by doing shit like:

1) Describing non-Romans in terms that are pretty obviously engineered to justify thinking of them as subhumans and committing atrocities against them.
2) Directly giving the players vote choices like "brutally kill the POWs," "brutally maim the POWs," and "enslave the POWs but take a mechanical malus."
3) Tacitly encouraging discussion to take darker and darker terms as the thread goes on.

@Telamon is better than that, and I think most of the old Res Publica regulars are better than that.

It is upon Sertorius to do the punishment not us, if we do this legion will know who stood behind this and we will lose standing we tried to build.
The flip side of that is that the legion thinks almost as highly of as as they do of Sertorius: 7/10 instead of 8/10.

Atellus is the tribune, to borrow Telamon's phrasing. If Sertorius came down with an incapacitating disease or something, I'm pretty sure that if we started issuing orders to keep the legion running in his stead for a while, people wouldn't object unless Mercator or Carcellus raised a big stink about it.

We've spent literally months building up our reputation as a respectable and just authority figure who understands the soldiers' concerns but takes order and discipline seriously within the legion. Sertorius trusted us to command nearly half the legion on an independent operation for months, and the troops followed us without grumbling. And even when we drilled them harshly and even when we were getting clowned on by Gemino.

...

OK, well firstly, if you don't know who Livy is, you, uh... have a good deal yet to learn about ancient Rome, probably.

Livy, properly Titus Livius was a Roman historian, born around 64 BC (that is, about twenty years from the 'present' of the quest) and living up through around 12 or 17 AD. He wrote a massive work on the history of Rome from its founding in 753 BC up through his own times, and was on personal good terms with the Julio-Claudian dynasty, including the Roman emperor Augustus and the future emperor Claudius.

Livy's history of Rome is one of our main overall sources on, well, the history of Rome. Much of it is about events that occurred hundreds of years before Livy was born, and so may or may not be accurate, but Livy had access to a vast array of primary sources that are lost to us, and without him there's a lot we just wouldn't know.

So he was basically one of the most authoritative historians of the Romans, about the Romans.

It been 2 months of siege. I doubt they would have shared food with prisoners.
I think @Telamon would say something if we had reason to think that the Samnite rebels had deprived all the Romans within the city of food and left them to starve. Among other things, that would be a very risky move for the Samnites, because it would give the Romans every incentive to try something desperate to let the Sixth Legion into the city rather earlier.

I would vote the memorial but like I said I'm against punishing the legion
I will reiterate that my IC reason for doing so is basically "the legionnaires disobeyed orders." It's the commanding general's job to restrain his troops, but it's also the troops' job to obey the general when he tries to do so.

We should celebrate. It has been a long and hard campaign and we have discovered wine that will otherwise be selfishly sold off at a profit when we reach Rome. Instead of allowing such a disaster to happen we should use the wine while we have it and earn the love of our men with our generosity and kindness.
You didn't answer the question.

The Sixth Legion just slaughtered several thousand people, many of them Romans, some of them women and children.

Do you like where this goes if we decide that the total destruction of a Roman city that had been occupied by rebels is grounds for celebration?



...

EDIT

Actually, @Godwinson makes a very good point. The tone of the previous article makes it very ambiguous whether Sertorius actually did give the order to storm the walls of Nola, to what extent he stood aside and "let" Atellus do it, and so on.

My original reading was that Sertorius planned to pull an Andrew Jackson ("so sorry, I didn't get word that I was supposed to stand down until I'd already defeated the enemy, whoopsie!") by ordering an immediate assault on the city.

But it's a bit ambivalent, and since, as noted, Atellus spent much of the battle in a blur of hunger-sharpened rage and dissociative states, we don't really know OOC what was going on.

It would really influence my vote choice if Atellus is gradually figuring out that he didn't just participate in the destruction of Nola, but that it wouldn't even have happened without the way he handled himself in the staff meeting with Sertorius. As @Godwinson suspects.
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan Optimat Politics
-[X] Write-In: Discipline. It is said soldiers ignored Sertorius and his officers' commands to cease during the sack. There must be a punishment for such insubordination. You have the pay of all men who ignored orders heavily docked. Gold speaks louder than blood.
-[X] Write-In: Memorial. Have a stone monument erected outside the ruins of Nola, with an inscription in large letters, high enough off the ground that a man cannot easily reach it. "Here stood the city of Nola, spurning the outstretched hand of Rome. Here came the sword of Rome, in the year of Flaccus and Marius. Here fell the city of Nola."
-[X] The Cult of Mars: You attempt to solidify your small cult, turning it into an organization which may survive the transition from military life to civilian. Having brothers bound by bonds deeper than blood in the killing fields of the Senate may prove useful.
-[X] Expand Journal: You begin expanding your journal to include more than strictly military matters, such as political happenings or philosophical musings.
-[X] Make Connections: Ever aloof and arrogant, the aristocrats of the equtii, the knights of Rome, have come to respect you as a leader to look up to over the course of this campaign. You could try to make some deeper connections that might serve you well in the city.
 
You know, re-reading it, I almost wonder if the issue isn't that Atellus was leading the berserk sack against orders--

The Senate ordered us to return, because Nola wasn't considered a threat. Then Atellus gave the order to assault and sack the city.


The Senate had ordered us to return and implicitly ordered us to spare Nola. Atellus then lead the devastation of the city. Looking at what was written, it is entirely possible that Atellus was the one who went counter to orders, and the reason why Sertorius is acting so strangely is because rather than stringing us up for violating his orders to stop, he's going to act as though he had given the order to sack the city and some of the men got carried away.

@Telamon
Is this something that's intended to be a question, or am I just reading into things that aren't there?

Sertorius, as far as you can tell, is acting strangely because he didn't want the city destroyed. He was going to make a new power base in the Italian heartlands out of it, a goal he had hinted at several times. Establishing a proper colony for the Sixth so close to Rome itself will be more difficult without the great excuse of "there's an empty city let's fill it up", as Sertorius' 'friends' in the Senate will no doubt want any excuse not to let an ambitious and powerful general establish a permanent power base for his family smack-dab in the middle of Italy — they'd rather the Sixth go off to Africa or someplace after their service and grow turnips.

He had a plan, and it went up in ashes, strictly as a result of his own decision to take the city irregardless of the Senate's wishes. What he's feeling now, if Atellus had to put a tag on it, would be a sort of bitter chagrin mixed with frustration at his own legion.

Like SimonJester says, Atellus was in a semi-disassociative state for most of the battle. However, he does remember Sertorius calling the officers together and giving the order to storm the city. That the words fell from your lips was a consequence of your duty as second-in-command.

This is, of course, just what Atellus remembers.
 
Last edited:
Sertorius, as far as you can tell, is acting strangely because he didn't want the city destroyed. He was going to make a new power base in the Italian heartlands out of it.
Ahh. So as Veniximaeus no doubt tells his Gauls on a regular basis, often with a lot of shouting and hitting:

"Pillage, then burn."

[Yes my headcanon is that he's a distant ancestor of the Tagons in Schlock Mercenary, why do you ask?]

Like SimonJester says, Atellus was in a semi-disassociative state for most of the battle. However, he does remember Sertorius calling the officers together and giving the order to storm the city. That the words fell from your lips was a consequence of your duty as second-in-command.

This is, of course, just what Atellus remembers.
OK, so that clears it up. And, again, taking this purely from the standpoint of being a Roman, not only was this a particularly savage and horrific act, and not only did the soldiers disobey their general, but they also own-goaled themselves, because it looks like Sertorius won't be able to get Nola as a colony for his veterans now because his veterans destroyed the place.

I think this should probably be mentioned to the legion as justification for the fine if we vote Discipline. The lost pay can go to the widows-and-orphans fund or something; does the legion have a widows-and-orphans fund?
 
Back
Top