Remove ads

Punching the Fucking Apocalypse Right In Its Stupid Face: A 5th Ed D & D Quest

Reader mode
What, no punch class offered in a punching quest?

Or is the Wild Magic Sorcerer class the one to do that? Gloves like that could be casting implements and nothing in the description says punch wizard to me.

If chaos magic punch wizard is an option, it would have my vote in a heartbeat, otherwise I don't care much. All the classes look interesting.
 
[X] Plan Sword Lesbian
-[X] [NAME] Elisanna (Half-Orc)
-[X] [WEAPON] Greatsword (Barbarian: Path of Zealotry)
 
[X]Plan Bring the house down
-[X] [NAME] Trinness (Dragonborn)
-[X] [WEAPON] Gloves stitched with arcane symbols (Sorcerer: Wild Magic)
Felipe Melo said:
[X] Plan Wild Dragon
-[X] Trinness
-[X] Gloves stitched with arcane symbols

It's not very popular right now but this is the most interesting option for me.
An element of wrestling our powers under our control is something I've never seen in any quest, and I like dragons, so this is why I'm making this choice.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Both of you have the same plan but different plan name
 
Enerael said:
What, no punch class offered in a punching quest?

Or is the Wild Magic Sorcerer class the one to do that? Gloves like that could be casting implements and nothing in the description says punch wizard to me.

If chaos magic punch wizard is an option, it would have my vote in a heartbeat, otherwise I don't care much. All the classes look interesting.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

It occures to me now that that is an oversight yes.

I had a reason for what I picked, but.

I can promise a renegade Shepard amount of punching for every combination regardless.

butchock said:
Both of you have the same plan but different plan name
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Ifvotes are functionally identical vote I would add them together when reading the tally.
 
Hopefully the Dark Lord Nerus wasn't our Saruman equivalent and we still get the catharsis of beating him down, the objectively most punchable Tolkien character.

EDIT: Well outside of Maeglin obviously... and Celegorm of course... oh can't forget Ar-Pharazon... Castamir, Brodda, Forweg... there's a lot of punchable Tolkien characters okay!
 
[X] Plan: I See What You Did There
-[X] [NAME] Lavisia (Tiefling)
-[X] [WEAPON] Crossbow (Rogue: Inquisitive)
 
[X]Plan Bring the house down
-[X] [NAME] Trinness (Dragonborn)
-[X] [WEAPON] Gloves stitched with arcane symbols (Sorcerer: Wild Magic)

I am never going to tire of dragony and magical options. And Dragonborn is different from usual dragons.
 
I'm going to close the vote approximately 6 hours from now at:

After that I'll be calling for the ability score rolls from whoever is around at that time.
 
[X] Plan Sword Lesbian
-[X] [NAME] Elisanna (Half-Orc)
-[X] [WEAPON] Greatsword (Barbarian: Path of Zealotry)
 
Plan Doot seems unsuccessful, alas. But tbh, the more I think about Sword Lesbian... half-orc barbarian is fairly cliche, is it not?

Which leaves me going to -

[X] Plan: Stab it till it dies
 
Jenny said:
Plan Doot seems unsuccessful, alas. But tbh, the more I think about Sword Lesbian... half-orc barbarian is fairly cliche, is it not?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Based on this chart from 2017, not really. Barbarian is the most popular class for half-orcs, but there are just as many goliath barbarians. And a quick count puts 18 race+class combinations with higher numbers than half-orc barbarians. Meanwhile, while tiefling sorcerer is less common, it's also the second-most common choice for tieflings. (Tieflings being the third-most popular races for sorcerers.)

Notably missing from the chart is sexuality, so I can't place how rare lesbian characters are. :p
 
looks like:

[X] Plan: Stab it till it dies
-[X] [NAME] Lavisia
-[X] [WEAPON] Rapier with arcane symbols on it
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Has emerged in the lead.

If I could get some people to roll 4d6 (drop lowest) six times for ability scores?
 
13, 13, 11, 14, 14, 10
Average roll for 4d6 drop lowest is about 12.2, and we average 12.5 so we're slightly ahead of the odds. Ofc, more variance in stats would be better, but not having any blatant weakpoints has its advantages.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top