Chapter 1:
The summer of 2014 had been very eventful in the Middle East. The Islamist...
The summer of 2014 had been very eventful in the Middle East. The Islamist...
PYD: The Syrian branch of the PKK, a Kurdish Maoist terrorist group originating in Turkey.
Rojava is not Maoist, like I have no idea why you'd think that. Moreover, what evidence do you have that the PYD is the Syirian branch of the PKK. And Assad has killed literally hundreds of thousands of his own citizens and wounded and maimed hundreds of the thousands more. His regime is monstrous.Saddam was far worse than Assad. Assad has never committed genocide (mass murder targeted at a specific ethnic group) and has never invaded other countries. PYD is the Syrian branch of PKK. Northeastern Syria is controlled by Maoist terrorists.
The rest of the Middle East is like it was in 1095 CE. The Fatimids rule Egypt, and the Seljuk Turks rule Iran. The Peshmerga was able to stop ISIS in OTL, and the Shia militias in Iraq were also able to stop ISIS in OTL. But ISIS will likely steamroll Syria if Israel doesn't intervene.So either the ISOTED muslim countries manage to stop ISIS with the help or not of Israel or they fall to it and then Israel turns the Middle East to a nuclear parking lot?
I don't think the IDF has the supplies to take out ISIL in a regular style campaign so the death cult goes in a nuclear holocaust, just like they liked it?
If said regions are the ones ISOTED that is? What about the rest of the Middle East? Iran? Jordan? Egypt? The rest of em?
This is a very interesting theory. I have always imagined modern countries, which is ISOT'ed to a pre-industrial era, to become superpowers. I'm using an idea made by @ScottishMongol (I have changed her idea by not ISOT'ing the Palestinian territories). She assumed, that Israel and ISIS would dominate the world after the ISOT. Perhaps we are mistaken.Still wouldn't work, modern militaries are too heavily reliant on a global infrastructure to work, the smaller and less self-sufficient the country the worse off they would be. And since modern countries generally lack in basic skills they would actually get stomped by the locals after a few years. Like if you took the average person on SV and put them in the year 1000AD, they would be less useful than a common peasant, since at least those peasants had the skills needed to survive without too much support. It's not just the Middle-East that has this problem but it has a worse issue with it because there is so little real manufacturing and a lot of traditional skills have been lost.
Everything that is not supported by a full chain of production and cadre of professionals with the appropriate technical and theoretical knowledge breaks down within a generation or two. This isn't supposition, it's basic reality. Just about every aspect of modern civilization is heavily interdependent with other components of it, and relies on the accumulated knowledge base and infrastructure built up over preceding centuries.This is a very interesting theory. I have always imagined modern countries, which is ISOT'ed to a pre-industrial era, to become superpowers. I'm using an idea made by @ScottishMongol (I have changed her idea by not ISOT'ing the Palestinian territories). She assumed, that Israel and ISIS would dominate the world after the ISOT. Perhaps we are mistaken.
Israel has a large arms industry. It will ensure Israel being the superpower of this world.Everything that is not supported by a full chain of production and cadre of professionals with the appropriate technical and theoretical knowledge breaks down within a generation or two. This isn't supposition, it's basic reality. Just about every aspect of modern civilization is heavily interdependent with other components of it, and relies on the accumulated knowledge base and infrastructure built up over preceding centuries.
If you ISOTed the U.S., Russia, or China entire, they could probably pull it off. Most other countries just flat-out don't control enough of the resources and production facilities they depend on to keep their infrastructure and pre-ISOT technology base intact.
The best bet for a smaller region/group in an ISOT situation is to spend what they have to carve out a niche in their new world and build up a lower-tech baseline they're actually capable of maintaining before they run out of everything that makes them more than a bunch of unskilled labor. That, and ensuring that they embark on a rigorous education process to cross-train the people already there and ensure what knowledge they do have survives past the ISOT group.
No, because while they have a lot of arms now, they have to import the things to make those arms, they have to import the copper for the bullet jackets, the chemicals for the gunpowder, for the rocket propellant, the fuel for their vehicles, they have to import their technology and the stuff to keep it working. Israel is one of the worst possible options for this actually. Probably the best ones to get ISOT'd would be a merely semi-developed country like India, where they actually still have people who understand how to do things at every level of the technological chain.Israel has a large arms industry. It will ensure Israel being the superpower of this world.
Still wouldn't work, modern militaries are too heavily reliant on a global infrastructure to work, the smaller and less self-sufficient the country the worse off they would be. And since modern countries generally lack in basic skills they would actually get stomped by the locals after a few years.
Not really what I meant. How much food they would have? How many days/weeks of supply before they have to depend on their farms?List of countries by food energy intake - Wikipedia
You could probably cut Israeli calorie intake in half without people outright dying. This would be simply unhealthy.
Not really what I meant. How much food they would have? How many days/weeks of supply before they have to depend on their farms?
Israel will import Kurdish oil in this timeline (the Peshmerga controlled Kirkuk, when the ISOT happened). The problems you mention may become problems in the long-term. I haven't put much thought into the long-term effects of the ISOT yet. Short-term, the biggest issue is basically how to stop ISIS with the great powers of 2014 having disappeared. Israel, KRG, Assad and the Iraqi government now have a common enemy, which they have to fight without support from USA, Russia, Iran or Turkey. Kurdish independence is inevitable in this timeline, because Turkey and Iran has disappeared. Israeli annexation of Judea and Samaria is inevitable in this timeline, because the Palestinian territories weren't ISOT'ed. As the superpower of this world, Israel will have to decide on a strategy for defeating or containing ISIS. Israel will not be distracted by the Israel/Palestine conflict in the fight against ISIS, because the Palestinian territories weren't ISOT'ed.No, because while they have a lot of arms now, they have to import the things to make those arms, they have to import the copper for the bullet jackets, the chemicals for the gunpowder, for the rocket propellant, the fuel for their vehicles, they have to import their technology and the stuff to keep it working. Israel is one of the worst possible options for this actually. Probably the best ones to get ISOT'd would be a merely semi-developed country like India, where they actually still have people who understand how to do things at every level of the technological chain.
Israel will not be distracted by (...) conflict in the fight against ISIS,
Do either of those countries have oil refineries to make gasoline? Is there enough food production in the Middle-East to keep people from starving without importation? What happens when the rest of the Muslim and Christian world decide that the change is heretical and launch Jihad/Crusades against them?srael will import Kurdish oil in this timeline (the Peshmerga controlled Kirkuk, when the ISOT happened).
but the real issue is that there would be more enemies than you have bullets or bombs, and modern troops are not trained to combat ancient tactics.
Do either of those countries have oil refineries to make gasoline?
Israel will likely be supported by Christian Europe, because Israel allows Christian pilgrims free access to the Christian holy sites in Jerusalem and in other parts of the Holy Land. The Seljuqs limiting Christian pilgrimage to Jerusalem was an important reason for the First Crusade.Do either of those countries have oil refineries to make gasoline? Is there enough food production in the Middle-East to keep people from starving without importation? What happens when the rest of the Muslim and Christian world decide that the change is heretical and launch Jihad/Crusades against them?
You may say that bullets trump everything, but the real issue is that there would be more enemies than you have bullets or bombs, and modern troops are not trained to combat ancient tactics. This is significant because tactics are designed to counter specific other sets of tactics, so small unit tactics that they use currently are mostly designed to counter artillery and are ineffective when you don't have firearms.
I imagine that a lot of the resources of ammunition would get depleted within the first few years of conflict against ISIS and one another. As soon as ISIS was defeated then there would be no reason to work together and in fact the prevailing view would probably be that if there was only on power remaining from the ISOT then they could reap all the benefits of their OOC situation. I can easily picture another Arab alliance, this time with mixed armor and cavalry from across the Muslim world coming in to exterminate Israel. People like to talk up Israel's military clout, but most of that is because the west backs them so heavily and uses to them to test new military innovations, without the backing of the US and Europe they would be fucked.
Israel will likely be supported by Christian Europe, because Israel allows Christian pilgrims free access to the Christian holy sites in Jerusalem