[X] Gustaf Rechtshandler, perhaps the only other educated person in this entire inn. You're no high-browed professor who disdains the common folk, but it would be nice to have a conversation with someone as literate as you are.
Currently, no, unless someone wants to make an argument why it makes sense for the current vote.
I mean it is not ranked aproval voting, so it is aimed at "I dislike one option and so do not care which of the others wins" in such a situation.My argument would be that it takes no more effort at all to tally approval voting due to the way the tally system votes, so it's not more work for you; while on the other hand it better represents what people want.
In fact, isn't it more work for you to disallow approval voting since it would mean you'd have to manually read each vote to decide to "not count" it?
Approval voting isn't antivoting, it's being able to choose all the options you do want to read, and being ambivalent about the ones you don't.I mean it is not ranked aproval voting, so it is aimed at "I dislike one option and so do not care which of the others wins" in such a situation.
Approval voting isn't antivoting, it's being able to choose all the options you do want to read, and being ambivalent about the ones you don't.
The only reason a phenomenon like that would beat out the number of voters who desired one option or another would be that it would accurately represent that a majority of voters wanted more than one option other than it.
But those are the same, I'm saying. We approach the strong man, and we say that we are a wizard, but we are also a soldier, and we understand soldiers, so we can still be friends. We approach the scholar, and we say that we are a wizard, but also an intellectual, and we understand scholarly pursuits, so we can still be friends. We approach the halfling, and we say that we are a wizard, but also a gambler, and we understand having fun, so we can still be friends.