Because I saw them get hit and they didn't lose an eye

Here's the downside of producing very vivid imagery in your writing.
Not relevant because then I'd be immediatly chocking on the water and coughing, not sanding and blocking the water stream with my hands.
No, that would definitely not satisfy me.
You might be able to describe a sequence of events where it was plausible events occurred as you described them, but that doesn't matter because that's not what I read in the story (and this applies even if it's what you wrote).
To clarify, I didn't (and don't as a general rule when I post comments on a story) mean my comments as "This was badly written and you need to change it". I was pointing out how I read it (which appears to be different then what you wrote) and why I didn't find that belivable. Unless you get a whole bunch of people with the same complaint I'd expect you to ignore it.
If you start dissecting my nitpicking, I tend to think that's because you enjoy nitpicking.