EternalObserver
eYe Gaze baCk
- Location
- The Void
[X] [Roll] Collect Surface Thoughts
Oh, sorry. Right, well, using D&D difficulty classes, the required dice-roll from a D20 is "10" for an average difficulty task, and 15 for a tough task. This is ignoring skill and attribute modifiers.Sorry, should have specified. By DC I meant Dice check, meaning how high do we have to roll to succeed in casting the spell? Not including modifiers of course.
In front of whom? Perhaps "you" was meant to be there?Your monologue, while aimed at no one in particular, was clearly aimed at the man in front of him.
"The other peculiar thing was how the children died, in those cases. They starved" you continued.
etc."That will be all, thank you Mr and Mrs Hazelkamp, for your assistance and time" you announce.
It is not as though I can attack him when he has them all protecting him, I'm not fighting that army The apprentice thought.
Or, in this case, the dot instead of a comma creates a new sentence, and makes the meaning less clear:
Did the last part refer to the italicized thought, or was Mrs Hazelkamp contemplating something we weren't privy to? It requires reading further to understand it from context.Please read it. Just read it, go there and end this, please. She was thinking.
There are easier ways to procure food with the sort of abilities the Isekais have, and the method is extremely inefficient as a significant portion of food goes into feeding the kids (otherwise it wouldn't be just uncooperative villages who'd find their children starved).I think we can definitively assume that the name is misleading, The Isekai is using prejudice for his means. The Isekai is less of a degenerate lolicon and more an extortionist robbing villages for food.
I took it for emphasis, as in, "I am not fighting that." Which is a generalisation that could be anything.However, in this world describing a lot monsters as "an army" and the word "them" is kind of unusual.
Grief-stricken, guilt-ridden people who may think that they have unwittingly killed their child? Not caring much what happens to them, feeling like they may deserve punishment, and already cooperating with the Inquisition? Sounds like something that should have happened a few times considering the sheer number of people involved.Who would willingly fess up to having helped the local equivalent of the devil, even at metaphorical gunpoint, to the inquisition?
It is ambiguous whether this was confidence or desperation (if that). It is clear the peasants don't really know how the Piper is observing them, only that they do. She felt it could work, but she also knew she takes an unknown risk. Note the wording, "go there and end this, please." She wants it to end, but she is uncertain about the outcome.However, the mother felt confident enough to sneak a piece of paper to us. Whatever the surveillance is, it is clearly something that, at least in this circumstance, with our pressure on them, they thought they might be able to get away with. This excludes telepathy or visual-audio scrying, as they should be able to easily pick up such a low-tech trick to get around it.
Few children do die, however. Our best estimate is that only those who failed to collaborate or actually talked to us suffer, so the 'grief-stricken and guilt-ridden' are the people who already spilled their guts. You also underestimate just how effective the protective instinct of a parent is; do you really think feelings of guilt would convince a breadwinner to come to us and let himself be taken away (in his own mind if not in reality) from his child after they've been returned?Grief-stricken, guilt-ridden people who may think that they have unwittingly killed their child? Not caring much what happens to them, feeling like they may deserve punishment, and already cooperating with the Inquisition? Sounds like something that should have happened a few times considering the sheer number of people involved.
Then don't call it confidence if it isn't confidence, but that was the only method either of them considered viable to get us out of the house. Again, I suspect the Piper is smart enough to only pick out the right people to interact with directly, which would mean only a few collaborators would ever learn how they're being observed, and would also explain why he so effectively prevented anyone with useful information from ever coming forward; every single one of them was utterly convinced by whatever demonstration the Piper gave, so much so that even after he's left nobody feels confident enough to speak up in the future, so much so that even the thought of being sneaky about it gets shut down fast and hard.It is ambiguous whether this was confidence or desperation (if that). It is clear the peasants don't really know how the Piper is observing them, only that they do. She felt it could work, but she also knew she takes an unknown risk. Note the wording, "go there and end this, please." She wants it to end, but she is uncertain about the outcome.
Scrying is probably giving the Isekai more credit than they are worth, but I'd point out they are only interested in observing people interacting with the investigators. The wife went away to write her message, and if they were focused on the husband talking -- or rather, not talking -- it's entirely plausible she could have slipped notice.
I considered rats or birds, though how different would that be from scrying? If a spell could pick up something, wouldn't a rat be able to observe it, and vice versa? Wouldn't we have to assume rats intelligent enough to understand human speech or sharing senses with the Isekai? The information has to get to them somehow, or how else would they rat out the snitches?
I suppose they are easier to ward against. I added "beware of small animals" to the list of things to watch out for.
Will staff be volunteering any time as beta readers to help armchair stay within the rules, if you have concerns?
Could you be clear about where infractions are going to be issued? While stuff like advocating abuse of minors or downplaying the harm it causes is pretty obvious rule breaking, the fact that the thread got pre-emptively locked due to concerns over the potentially implied actions of a villain makes me concerned exactly where the boundary will be drawn, as normally I would have assumed that was itself enough to show it was bad.