Grand Strategy Roleplay Format Test Thread



THE COSMIC TOUR
Part IV: Das Deutsche Rom


Salzburg, by the time Cosimo Ferdinando de' Medici came by in 1742, had long been one of the premier seats of power of the Catholic Church north of the Alps. Independently ruled since the Middle Ages by its powerful Prince-Archbishops, who had grown fat and wealthy from the local salt works and the salt trade (hence the name of their city, Salzburg), their ecclesiastical state and rank had slowly grown in prominence as it remained a bastion of the Church throughout the Reformation. When Magdeburg fell away from the light of Rome, the Archbishops of Salzburg were made Primates of Germany in 1529. Salzburg alternated with Austria and Burgundy for the presidency of the Bench of Ecclesiastical Princes at the imperial diet in Regensburg, and with the Austrians as director of the entire College of Princes. In the early eighteenth century, the Archdiocese of Salzburg counted with seven suffragan bishops: three imperial (Passau, Freising and Brixen), three in Carinthia and Styria (Seckau, Lavant and Gurk), and Chiemsee in Bavaria. Much valued by the Vatican, the archbishops of Salzburg not only held the title of Primas Germaniae, as the Pope's first correspondent in the German-speaking world, but also that of Legatus Natus ("born legate"), giving them the high honor and privilege of wearing red vesture, even when in Rome. The temporal power of the prince-archbishopric was absolute, while they held immediate pastoral authority over not only Salzburg, but also parts of Bavaria, Upper and Lower Austria, and the Tyrol. Their preeminence was thus unquestionable.

By the mid-eighteenth century, however, Salzburg found itself in relative decline. The transformation of the Holy Roman Empire with the advent of Imperialism had eroded the temporal and spiritual authority of the archbishops, especially after Salzburg was left out of the Harmonious Union in the wake of the War of the Bavarian Succession. The prosperity of the land also found itself under pressure. The salt works in the Salzkammergut, under the direct administration of the archbishops' Hofkammer, remained as prosperous as ever, as did the market towns of the lower valleys, but the situation of the rural economy was less stable. Hidden away on the mountainsides and the high valleys, the bulk of the population was scattered throughout family-sized farmsteads (Guts), rarely coming together to form even villages.

Four out of five of the inhabitants of a Gut were typically safely established, whether due to kinship to the family patriarch or to ownership of the farm estate. The other fifth were less fortunate, however. They were more distant relations, wage or contract laborers and seasonal workers, detached from the core family unit. Overpopulation had thus placed the rural economy under stress, which often expressed itself in the form of religious strife: the towns and markets of the Salzkammergut were firmly Catholic, but the household members of the Guts, who had no need or use of organized religion, were less so. It is said that the Archbishops had been considering expelling the Protestant population, heavily concentrated in the alpine region of Pinzgau and Pongau and numbering well over, at least, thirty thousand, a process to which the War of the Bavarian Succession had put an end to. The House of Medici had been granted the Prince-Archbishopric as a secundogeniture, and in the complicated regime change that followed all plans for mass expulsion had to be scrapped.


The Salzburg that welcomed Cosimo IV de' Medici with open arms was not the impoverished Salzburg of the mountainsides and the high valleys, however, but the splendid Salzburg of the archbishops. The wealth of the city, combined with the immaculate vision of its rulers, had made Salzburg into the capital of the German Baroque. By the 1740's, the medieval city was long gone, replaced instead by the churches, palaces, townhouses, gardens and fountains of the new style of the Counter-Reformation. "The music of the bells here is otherworldly," Cosimo would write home, once he had settled in the city. "Every church is an instrument in a symphony, and it is as if all of Salisburgo is an open air opera house. It is no wonder that they call this city the Rome of the North, for beauty like this is difficult to see, even in Italy." The so-called German Rome was indeed a city of churches, although it was not the Cathedral of Saints Rupert and Vergilius that dominated the local skyline, but the ancient castle of the archbishops. Resting on a five hundred meter peak above the Salzach river, the fortress-palace of Hohensalzburg towered over the city, still intimidating in this time and age.

After a long sojourn to the alpine town of Bad Gastein, where the Queen Louise Élisabeth could enjoy the famed healing waters of the mountain hot springs to fully recuperate from her ordeals, the Medici made their entry to the city, escorted by what the Medici did best: great fanfare. They had already passed through Salzburg on the way to Vienna, but the reception then had been dedicated to the Emperor. This time, it was the Medici they celebrated, for the Most Serene King brought with him the new occupant of the archiepiscopal throne. Prince Giuliano Gastone de' Medici was Cosimo IV's third son. He had been born in 1731, the very same year that Salzburg had come into the possession of the House of Medici. Giuliano had been raised from birth for a church career; therefore, he had been raised from birth for Salzburg, and for his very occasion. The prince was only eleven years old, but his election as Archbishop had been predetermined (though not without some concessions, as his father had had to promise the cathedral chapter that his son would not introduce new religious orders to the archdiocese, where the Benedictines held almost complete sway). Therefore, following the Duke of Urbino's resignation from the see, his godson Giuliano Gastone was elected the new Archbishop of Salzburg, while the Medici rested in Bad Gastein.

The next month, as was the tradition, the new Archbishop made his triumphal entry to the city. Cosimo IV records his amusement at the situation in his diary, as, even though he held precedence over his son due to being a King, his eleven year old son had been the center of attention. It was understandable. Salzburg had been left adrift since 1731, with the Cardinal de' Medici, the nominal archbishop, treating it with utmost neglect as a mere source of income and station, having never even visited his see. The Salzburgers, then, embraced the new archbishop with great enthusiasm, hoping that better times for their state were in sight. Salzburg received the Medici with pomp and circumstance, as befitting the enthronement of their new sovereign. To the sound of drums, trumpets, bells and two hundred cannons, which added to the joyous chorus from atop the Hohensalzburg fortress, a procession of the members of the archiepiscopal court, the estates and the guilds escorted the Medici to the Domplatz, the cathedral square, where the citizens paid the young prince their homage to the cries of "Vivat Julian Gaston, our prince and lord!", cries of jubilation which persisted well into the night. At age eleven, Giuliano Gastone de' Medici was enthroned as Prince-Archbishop of Salzburg. Although he would only take his religious vows and properly assume ecclesiastical functions once he came of age, he was promoted as Cardinal in a consistory held by Pope Innocent XIV two months later.


GIULIANO GASTONE DE' MEDICI
Cardinal-Archbishop of Salzburg, Primate of Germany and Duke in Bavaria

Change, as a matter of fact, came immediately, delivered to the citizens, guilds and estates of Salzburg by the means of a well-rehearsed address professed by the eleven year old archbishop himself, from the canopied dais in the Domplatz. Giuliano spoke German fluently since infancy, as his father the Most Serene King had insisted on, and, despite a twist of tongue or two due to his youth, the speech the boy read from the script he had been given was the highpoint of the ceremony. The true authorship of the text, as it would later become clear, was his father's, if not in practice, then in essence. Cosimo IV had been brought up on the legend of L'Apertura and the Fernandine Revolution, when his father, King Ferdinand III, had done away with the religious tyranny and obscurantism of his predecessor, Cosimo III, and promoted a reopening of the Tuscan society, science and social life. Cosimo Ferdinando had privately bemoaned that he had not been given a similar chance to shine and inscribe his name in the annals of history. So, when given the opportunity to correct the old regime and the Medicean neglect in Salzburg, who can blame him for acting on it? Certainly not the King himself, who would later proudly take credit, in his correspondence, of having promoted the "Salzburger Eröffnung", i.e. L'Apertura of Salzburg, bringing education, enlightenment and good governance in the image of his father to "das Mutterland," a model of modernity in direct contradiction to the perceived obscurantism of Nuremberg that still held much of the Mutterland under its thumb.

The people of Salzburg, after all, had long lived under a so-called priest and police state. The beating heart of the Counter-Reformation in Germany, the archiepiscopal authorities had spared no expenses, in the past, to enforce social behavior in accordance with their understanding of Catholic virtue and morals. That they made money out of oppressing the population was merely a coincidence. Whilst not as extreme as Cosimo III's state of religious terror had been in Tuscany, the Salzburger version of it could not be disregarded. Serious offences against public decency, such as fornication and adultery, were punished with fines, imprisonment, forced labor and even territorial banishment. For minor offenses, the pillory was frequently used. Fundamental aspects of courtship, such as the practice of a lover's nightly visits before his girl's window, were prohibited, as well as other social practices such as dancing between May and September, the playing of Schmoldern (a roulette-like game), smoking tobacco etc. In short, when not overworked in the salt mines or suffering from the negative consequences of overpopulation in the highlands, the peasantry was faced with a police state ready to squeeze them out of every penny, while urban life in the city proper found itself stifled, and its forms of entertainment strictly controlled. The moralism present in Salzburg's police state was not uncommon elsewhere in the Catholic world, but, Cosimo thought, had already run its course by the 1740's.

The Prince-Archbishop's enthronement speech would directly address many of these issues, announcing measures that were to be taken immediately and laying out plans for the future. The actions and policies of the Salzburger Eröffnung closely mirrored, by no coincidence, the platform of Florence's 1708 L'Apertura, starting with the penal code. Capital punishment was extinguished for all crimes but high treason, differently from L'Apertura, which had allowed the death penalty also for the crimes of lèse-majesté and murder. The former crime would be extinguished in Salzburg, while the latter would receive other punishments, in a telling evolution of neo-humanist views in Tuscan jurisprudence. Public executions were discontinued altogether, as was corporeal punishment for minor offenses. Restrictions on social life were lifted altogether, and fines for improper moral behavior were reduced, when not eliminated. Naturally, many of these measures would be met with opposition and resistance in the established powers of Salzburg, as they significantly decreased the disciplinarian control of the clergy over public and private life, but they would often find popularity with the peasantry, the burghers and the liberal professions, who now found themselves unburdened with the dismantlement of the priest and police state. Such was the introduction of Salzburg to the Tuscan Enlightenment.


JOHANN BAPTIST VON ARCO
Count of Arco, Imperial Marshall and Stadtholder of Salzburg

The Italian Enlightenment might have been less well received in Salzburg, had it not found an important pillar of support in a new element that had been introduced after the War of 1731. The clergy and the guilds had long been established powers in Salzburg. A third power, however, had made itself present after the war, namely the group of Bavarian exiles, often accompanied by their families and households, who had taken refuge in Salzburg following the end of the Bruderkrieg (as well as a small company of Jacobite mercenaries, some of whom settled in Salzburg indefinitely). Although a large share of exiles had opted for Vienna instead, many ended up finding their way to neighboring Salzburg, the lands of which closely resembled their former homes in Oberbayern. Their leader was the illustrious Graf von Arco, a celebrated Bavarian general and loyalist who had refused to recognize Heinrich of Habsburg as Elector of Bavaria and, at Violante of Wittelsbach's instigation, had rallied Heinrich's opponents and declared for Cosimo IV as the rightful King and Elector of Bavaria.

Arco had been an old friend of the Medici by then, having fought by Cosimo III's side in the War of the Mantuan Succession and later leading the Bavarian military mission in Tuscany during the reign of Ferdinando III, reforming the Tuscan army to uphold the standards and forms of organization of Maximilian II Emanuel's forces. When the Dowager Queen of Tuscany reached out to the old general twenty years later, calling on him to defend the dynastic rights of the House of Wittelsbach and those of her only son to Bavaria, the Count of Arco had not hesitated. Although Arco and the Duke of Berwick had been unsuccessful in removing Heinrich from Bavaria, they were still richly rewarded for their service. Arco's loyalty and allegiance in particular earned him the governorship of Salzburg, after the war was done. The old general was not the only one to take up Tuscan service in Salzburg. Many of his allies and supporters had chosen exile over suffering the consequences of Heinrich's wrath, fleeing to Salzburg with their wealth, possessions and servants. Together with select Jacobite mercenaries, these exiles had become the bulk of the Salzburg Regiment, watching over the city and the Salzkammergut from the Hohensalzburg garrison to serve as jailers of the Harmonious Union.

Even a decade later, in 1742, many of the Bavarian exiles still recognized His Most Serene Majesty as Kosmas Ferdinand Maximilian of Bavaria, although his claim was long defunct. Moreover, they sought to find their place in the government of Salzburg, jealously guarded by the clergy. Therefore, when their King came to Salzburg and brought with him the Florentine lights, very much the opposite of Nuremberg's mysticism and increasingly aligned to the principle of secular authority over temporal matters, they were quick to offer their support. They were in turn awarded for their loyal service in the form of commissions, pensions and honors, generously distributed among them by both the King of Tuscany and the Cardinal-Archbishop. A final honor, in addition to the many already received in 1731, would be bestowed upon the ailing Arco, with his elevation to the hereditary rank and title of Serene Prince, as a peer of Tuscany and Africa. Now approaching ninety years of age, the now Prinz von Arco would finally personally meet His Most Serene Majesty, offering him a grand reception at the Salzburg Residenz. Cosimo would give him his heartfelt gratitude and finally allow the ancient general to retire, granting him a generous stipend as a pension of the Order of St. Stephen and the use of Mirabell Palace for life. At his recommendation, the prince Johann Aloys zu Oettingen-Spielberg was named as his successor as Stadtholder, with Hieronymus Cristiani von Rall stepping in as Hofkanzler (chancellor). They would be entrusted with the government of Salzburg during their Prince-Archbishop's minority (and perhaps beyond that), as Julian Gaston was expected to return to Italy to receive further education in Florence, Pisa and Rome. With his older sister Diana de Medicis settled down next door as Archduchess of Austria and Queen of Hungary, there was also a reasonable expectation that, in time, the Cardinal-Prince would attend the recently founded Carolean academies and perhaps play a significant role in the governance of Austria.


The Salzburg Regiment's parade for the enthronement of Prince Julian Gaston de Medicis before the Residenz

The Medici would linger in Salzburg for a few weeks, enjoying a blissful retirement from the world after the grand festivities for the Triple Wedding in Vienna and Don Carlos' lively entourage, which they had shadowed since Verona. It suited the Most Serene King just fine. The Medici may be masters of pageantry, but Cosimo IV could only take social merriment in small doses, often preferring the peace and quiet of a well-disciplined court or the introspective and dramatic music of the opera house. Not presuming to make use of the Residenz as his dwellings, and finding the Hohensalzburg too dreary, the King settled in Mirabell Palace for the duration of his stay (the Prince of Arco being a more than generous host). The days were spent lazily in Mirabell, with the occasional reception for a notable of Salzburg occasionally thrown in in the name of the Archbishop. The Most Serene King attended mass in the cathedral almost daily, paid visits to the Benedictine University and the other intellectual circles of the city, and enjoyed the many musical talents of the Salzburger court (including a young violinist by the name of Leopold Mozart, a newcomer to the archbishop's court), though these days Cosimo preferred secular operas over liturgical music.

A highpoint of the visit was when the famously peaceful Cosimo was talked into making a show of martial prowess at the behest of Arco and the Prince of Spielberg. Although he was reluctant to embrace the pageantry at first, Cosimo eventually gave in. "These men called upon me to save their homeland as I had saved mine, and were left with bitter exile instead," he wrote to Cardinal Bandini. "Their loyalty must not only be rewarded, but it is also necessary for the preservation of the independence and sovereignty of Salzburg against the vengeful spirits of Nuremberg and the ambitions of the Generalissimo in Vienna."

The King thus mounted a white stallion and clad himself in a gilded black armor, the red Maltese cross bordered by gold of the Order of St. Stephen proudly emblazoned upon his chest, the grand collar of the same order and that of the Golden Fleece hanging around his neck. Upon his majestic wig rested a golden laurel wreath crown, allegedly presented to the King of Africa by the citizenry of Tunis. The arms of Medici and Wittelsbach flew splendidly in the wind, borne by twin standard bearers behind the King. At the Residenzplatz, he was hailed and saluted by the troops not as their sovereign, but as an honored guest of royal rank. "Vivat Kosmas-Ferdinand, König der Toskana und Afrikas," they chanted. "Vivat Kosmas-Ferdinand, Herzog in Bayern!". They took him up to the Hohensalzburg, where the King was given the opportunity to inspect the garrison and the artillery. It was a spectacle made for the benefit of the Bavarian exiles, who had never quite made their peace with the outcome of the war. Their pseudo-acclamation of Cosimo IV as Duke in Bavaria, in accordance with the terms of the 1731 Family Pact, with the King being present in person and surrounded by military pomp and circumstance, would provide them the closure they had been denied ever since Don Carlos and his lieutenants had ordered them to withdraw from Bavaria and cede all their hard-won gains to the usurper in Nuremberg.


The grenadier corps of the Salzburg Regiment

The parade of the Salzburg Regiment in his honor elicited an ever increasing sentiment of melancholy in the Most Serene King. Cosimo had been taken with bouts of longing and depression ever since crossing the Alps, as his grief and the memory of his mother still persisted even five years after her death. The more they approached "Das Mutterland," the ancestral Bavarian homeland of his mother's lineage, the more Cosimo became prone to his grief. The festivities at Vienna had been a useful distraction, but they had left Vienna behind. The extended duration of his stay in Salzburg, a stone's throw away from Bavaria and a part of Oberbayern in all but name, was in part born from his need to connect, on a spiritual level, with the Mutterland. His pompous acclamation by the Salzburg Regiment had only worsened the King's emotional state, rather than improving it. Their rest at Salzburg had been intended to build up their strength to cross the Alps back into Italy, by way of Innsbruck and Verona. Now, however, Cosimo, heartsick and melancholy, sought to add another stop in their journey, which had not been planned beforehand: the city of Munich, his mother's home.

It was not a trip to be taken lightly, considering the recent tension between Emperor Heinrich and the Medici over the Hofburg crisis, but, against his better judgment, Cosimo wrote to Nuremberg, announcing his intention to travel to Munich and seeking their support. As he waited for Heinrich's reply, the Most Serene King threw himself into work, as he was wont to do. Leaving the comfort and luxurious trappings of Salzburg, he toured the Salzkammergut, taking in the impoverished conditions of the countryside and the significant share of idle population, lacking both land and employment other than the occasional seasonal work. "I may have found a solution for both our problems and the problems of the Salzkammergut," he wrote to the economist Carlo Ginori back home. A brother-in-law of the prince Bartolomeo Corsini, Grand Chancellor of Tuscany, Ginori was the Governor of Livorno. He was a faithful adherent of the economic school of Siena and owned a famous porcelain factory that had made him rich. Ginori was known, too, as the greatest advocate of Tuscan colonialism, consistently pestering the court for more resources to develop the colony on San Martino and advocating for the purchase of another Caribbean island "to guarantee us direct trade with America, and perhaps to serve as the first necessary step to bigger projects." Cosimo IV saw in the overpopulation of Salzburg a solution for both states: if Salzburger immigration was encouraged, with the permission to establish settlements both in the depopulated Tuscan Maremma and in the Tuscan Caribbean, especially if Ginori's advice was followed, it would both alleviate the demographic pressure in the Salzkammergut and provide Tuscany and the Tuscan Caribbean with sorely needed workforce and settlers. For now, Salzburger immigration remained in the conceptual phase, but it was an idea firmly rooted in the back of the mind of the Most Serene King.

After all, Cosimo would not have much time to dwell on this matter. The Emperor's reply did not take long to arrive. He would accept his coming, in the name of "reconciling those who have caused issues." It was a language that the Most Serene King disliked, but he could have stomached it for the sake of visiting Munich, were it not for Heinrich's other demands. He was to come to Nuremberg to stand before the Emperor's majestic glow and to bow his head. He would be denied access otherwise. To say that the Emperor's reply infuriated Cosimo would be an understatement. Flashbacks to Ruzzini's demands aside, by what right did Heinrich, the Usurper, restrict access to Bavaria to Cosimo, himself a Duke in Bavaria and dynast of the royal house? By what right could he deny a son of Bavaria himself? It was petty, it was absurd, and it was humiliating, in the King's eyes. Although he was not prone to impulsive action, the conditioning of his visit to the Mutterland on a ritualistic submission at Nuremberg pushed him over the edge.

Heinrich did not want him in Bavaria? Fine. "The obscurity of the court of Nuremberg cannot stand the sight of light. I have better places to be," the enraged King commented to a courtier. Plans to return to Florence were scrapped. If he could not see the Mutterland with his own eyes, the Most Serene King would make it a point to visit every court in Europe but that of Heinrich. From Salzburg, the Rome of the North, the Medici would embark on their Cosmic Tour.


View of Salzburg
 
Last edited:
Work in Progress

  • LORD REYNARD BANEFORT (b. 32 AC), Lord of Banefort, Bastion of the Bay, Bearer of the Hero's Horn, an able sailor and a formidable knight who has aged into a venerable and respected lord. Lord Reynard received Banefort unexpectedly upon the death of his older brother, Alester, from Greyscale. Lord Reynard survived the sickness but was left visibly scarred and disfigured. The many troubles with his only son and heir culminating in Ser Rolph's tragic death left a deep wound upon both Lord Banefort and his wife.
    • LADY JOCELYN PRESTER (b. 33 AC), one of Lord Prester's many daughters, Jocelyn spent her first sixteen seasons as her father's heir apparent until the birth of healthy twin sons displaced her. Jocelyn was educated in the arts of ruling and governance and showed a keen mind for sums. With her succession as heir increasingly a remote possibility, her father instead married her to the Banefort heir in 65 AC, a position which suited Jocelyn perfectly as her husband often relied upon her counsel and afforded her a position of prominence in the governance of the Banefort.
      • SER ROLPH BANEFORT (58-99 AC), a spendthrift knight who showed little interest in ruling or his duties as heir despite many quarrels with his father and mother. Ser Rolph would spend brief periods of his life at the Banefort and ultimately took a wife at his father's insistence, but was prone to wandering and never remained in place for long. Died an impoverished sellsword in Pentos. Survived by his wife and three daughters.
        • LADY LEONELLA LEFFORD (b. 59 AC), the beloved daughter of Ser Lucion Lefford and Lady Cerissa Brax. A kind girl who grew up in a loving family. Her marriage to the Banefort heir was to be a triumph. Instead, Leonella was left with a husband who paid her and their children little mind. Leonella raised her children largely alone and refused to foster them. Leonella also insisted upon giving her children the chance to enjoy their childhood. This was the cause of many quarrels between Lord Banefort and Lady Leonella but ultimately, Leonella's preference prevailed.
          • LADY MARILYN BANEFORT (b. 77 AC), the heir to Banefort, raised by her grandfather and grandmother to take over the lordship. Lady Marilyn is a formidable woman who favours her father's Banefort looks. She is unmarried and has rejected several potential suitors.
          • LADY LEONELLA BANEFORT (b. 80 AC), said to be her mother's daughter in both looks and temperament. A gifted harper and the best rider of her sisters. She was the only one of her sisters to spend a significant portion of her early life outside of the Banefort, where she was a lady-in-waiting at the Golden Tooth and met her future husband at a tourney there. If Lady Marilyn has no children, Leonella will become the heir to Banefort.
            • SER ALASTOR REYNE (b. 83 AC), a one-eyed knight named for his ancestor who lived during the reign of King Jaehaerys. Ser Alastor is an established knight with a respectable record of tourney performances. He is a nephew of Lord Reyne but is but one of many sons born to Lord Reyne's brothers. Ser Alastor and Lady Leonella reside at Castamere but are strongly considering fostering one or both of their children at the Banefort in light of Leonella's position in the line of succession.
              • MANFRYD REYNE (b. 101 AC), a kindly young boy. Manfryd is considered strong for his age and is also considered kind and good-natured. He primarily takes after his Banefort mother in looks but has the wild red mane of his Reyne father.
              • JOCELYN REYNE (b. 103 AC), a girl with a fondness for birds, so much so that her father is contemplating teaching her falconry. Jocelyn takes after both her parents in appearance.
          • LADY ALYSSA BANEFORT (b. 81 AC), married to LORD MANFRED MARBRAND.
  • SER RAYNALD BANEFORT (b. 67 AC), a nephew of Lord Reynard, who is an able sailor and knight. While his lord uncle had only one child after many attempts to conceive, Ser Raynald and his wife have had several children.
    • LADY MARA ESTREN (b. 68 AC), a sister of Lord Regenard Estren. Lady Mara longed to return to her family home and so the family decided to raise their children at Wyndhall. Their children bring both joy and vexation to the halls of Lord Estren.
      • LUCION BANEFORT (b. 89 AC) their firstborn child. A promising squire of Ser Andros Yarwyck with a gallant manner. Ser Lucion is unmarried.
      • SYBELLA BANEFORT (b. 94 AC) a wild and tireless girl who has thwarted three Septas who tried to calm her and teach her to be a lady. Sybella is known to favour climbing and sneaking into places she is not meant to be. Her lord uncle has suggested that the adventurous young Sybella be put on an exhausting regimen of riding, archery, and swimming to calm her. Time will tell if this plan will bear fruit.
      • MARA BANEFORT (b. 99 AC) a quiet girl who likes to read poetry and stories. She longs for travel and adventure.
 
Last edited:
IMPERATOR ROMANORUM




On Christmas Day 1743 Pope Innocent XIV crowned Don Carlos III of Spain as Holy Roman Emperor (Sacrum Imperator Romanorum) Charles VI. The date was chosen in remembrance of another Pope and another Charles, Charles the Great, Carolus Magnus in Latin, otherwise Charlemagne, and his Christmastime coronation almost a thousand years before, back in A.D. 800.

In a term appearing simultaneously in corresponding Imperial decrees and Papal bulls prepared for the occassion, Don Carlos was recognized as the Holy Roman Emperor of the Latin Nation (Sacrum Imperator Romanorum Nationis Latinae), a qualifier used officially for the first time in distinction from the Holy Roman Emperor of the German Nation (Sacrum Imperator Romanorum Nationis Germanicae), his cousin Herr Heinrich.

By a legal fiction of epic proportions, the Kaiser and Cesare remained technically as they had been since 1731: brother-Emperors co-ruling a single legal entity. This entity was the universal kingdom,the dominion of the world, the Christian empire, the resurgent Rome. United de jure by nothing but dynastic pride, war exhaustion, and divergent but equally profound strands of Roman Catholic piety, the Holy Roman Empire was now de facto partitioned between the two heads of the Imperial eagle.

Earlier in the year, Don Carlos had already abdicated as King of Germany in Heinrich's favour (per the Innsbruck Decree) and renounced his vestigial rights in and to Germany and Bohemia to his second son, Philipp Ferdinand of Austria (per the Pragmatic Sanction).

Thus Don Carlos and Herr Heinrich consciously decoupled - in theory, at least, Germany had now seen the back of Don Carlos and Italy, of Herr Heinrich. In practice, things were not quite so simple.


Coronation of Charlemagne, 800 A.D.

Don Carlos' work was not done as soon as he stepped out the Cathedral-Basilica of the Nativity of St. Mary, otherwise known as the Duomo of Milan. The Holy Roman Empire of the Latin Nation was a new name for an old patchwork, born from the amalgamation of several distinct but inter-related legal entities: what was left of the Holy Roman Emperor's authority as feudal sovereign in Italy, the Spanish Presidency of the Italian League founded back in 1720 and the "Spanish" Kingdom of Italy dating back to 1724.

These now married the direct and indirect fiefs of Spain.The most notable of these were Milan, Naples and Sicily, all heldin personal union by Don Carlos with the Imperial diadem and the crowns of Spain. Among these, SIena, Finale Liguria and the Presidi (notably Milan, Naples and Sicily, but also Siena, Finale Liguria, the Presidi, etc.), creating a feudal, political and commercial patchwork whose exact design still demanded some ironing out.



The Constitutional Framework in 1743:

  • The Holy Roman Emperor of the Latin Nation is Don Carlos, sixth Holy Roman Emperor and King of Italy of that name, third of the name to be King of Spain, Naples and Sicily.​
  • The Emperor is responsible for the protection and welfare of Italy and the resolution of Italian conflicts, internal and external.​
  • The Imperial office is hereditary and inherited according to male-preference, semi-salic primogeniture succession, in personal union with the crowns of Spain, Naples and Sicily.​
  • The Imperial heir is styled King of the Romans (Rex Romanorum).​
  • There is no official impediment to female or female-line succession should male heirs be lacking.​
  • The Kings and Princes of Italy are the Emperor's colleagues and collaborators in the preservation of the order and welfare of Italy and the Roman Catholic religion.
  • The Imperial state religion is Roman Catholicism. One of the Emperor's subsidiary titles is Defender of the Church - Defensor Ecclesiae. Protestantism and Judaism are marginalized, if not outright criminal, depending on local legislation.​
  • There is no official capital, currency, royal court, nation-wide legislature, judiciary or customs union shared by all Princes.​
  • Venice is outside the Empire, but inside the Italian League. The Doge of Venice recognizes Don Carlos' feudal authority over (the rest of) Italy since 1724 and accepts his authority to arbitrate and decide Italian disputes, including those involving Venice. He does not, however, accept Don Carlos authority inside or over Venice itself.​
  • Notable documents include 1724 Pact of Liguria with Genoa, 1724 Pact of Modena with Modena-Reggio, 1724 Pact of Verona with Venice, 1724 Treaty of Siena with Tuscany, and similar pacts with lesser (NPC) lords made at the same time.​

The Administration pre-1743:

The Imperial Administration:

The Holy Roman Emperor exercised his feudal and judicial authority over the 250-300 Imperial fiefs in Italy primarily through the Imperial Court Council (Reichshofrat), a political-administrative body of the Holy Roman Empire. With the exception of the Duke of Savoy and the Prince-Bishops of Trent and Brixen, the Italian princes typically did not sit in the Imperial Diet (Reichstag). Thus, they dealt more directly with the Emperor and his own institutions based in Vienna. The Reichshofrat had a special Italian department since 1559 and heard over 1500 Italian cases from 1559 - 1806 (OTL).

The Spanish Administration:

The King of Spain exercised his political authority over Italy with the help of the Supreme Council of Italy (Real y Supremo Consejo de Italia), created 1556. This Council was typically headed by a President (a Grandee of Spain) and six Regents (2 for Milan, 2 for Naples, 2 for Sicily), half of them Spaniards and the other half naturales (natives). All had to be letrados, that is, experts in civil and canon law. The Supreme Council was a consultative body and advised the King on all matters Italy, notably the choice of Governor for Milan and Viceroys for Naples and Sicily and the chief military and civil appointments in those kingdoms. The Supreme Council produced documents of opinion called consultas, which could transmit unanimous opinion or register the conflicting opinions of different councillors. The King typically annoted the document with his decision on the matter.

Beneath the councillors served other lettered experts, including three secretaries (Milan, Naples, Sicily), a fiscal advocate (who supervised the Crown's interests) and Conservator general of the Patrimony (who supervised royal asset management in Italy).

The Italian Administration:

The King of Spain maintained three primary deputies in Italy - the Governor of Milan, the Viceroy of Naples and the Viceroy of Sicily. These were almost unwaveringly Roman Catholic men of solid faith, breeding and experience, variously Spaniards, Italians or that mixed breed of grandee with lands and relatives on both side of the Tyrrhenian Sea.

The Governor of Milan was the functional head of state in Milan, answering directly to El Escorial and heading all civil and military endeavours. He was assisted by the Grand Chancellor of Milan (Gran Cancelliere dello Stato di Milano), head of the Chancery of Milan (Cancelleria dello Stato di Milano) and the executive power. The Grand Chancellor had powers of veto over all other ministers and departments, and could only be dismissed by El Escorial. He presided over the vast consultative apparatus which served the Governor, called the Secret Chancellery (Cancelleria Segreta), supported in turn by a consultative and executive collegial body called the Secret Council (Consiglio Segreto). The symbiosis of these two officers was demonstrated by the fact that the Governor could appoint and remove at will the Vice Chancellor (Gran Cancelliere Vicaro), head of the Secret Chancellery, and the General Secretary of the Secret Council (Segretario generale del Consiglio segreto).

The Viceroy of Naples was meanwhile assisted by the Lord Lieutenant, appointed by him whenever he was away on military campaign, diplomatic business or any other state matter, and the Collateral Council (Consiglio Collaterale), founded in 1516 by Ferdinand the Catholic. The Viceroy of Sicily, for his part, exercised executive and judicial power presiding over the Sacred Royal Council (Sacro Regio Consiglio del Regno di Sicilia), and with added help from the Parlamento and the Deputazione (which, amongst other things, handled changes in taxation using a form of census called reveli).


Constitutional Framework of 1743:

Don Carlos' coronation as Holy Roman Emperor of the Latin Nation on Christmas Day, 1743, marked the consummation of a process over two decades long. Since the abdication of his ancestor Charles V in 1556, the Kingdom of Italy (Regnum Italiae) had served two masters: the Holy Roman Emperor in Vienna and the King of Spain in his capacity as Duke of Milan. The Emperor was Italy's feudal overlord and exercised this authority through the Reichshofrat, which enjoyed direct jurisdiction over the Imperial princes of Italy and could make, unmake, confirm or punish them when they broke the law.

The Duke of Milan meanwhile enjoyed a superior jurisdiction over his fellows, as the Emperor's comissioner with authority to execute the Reichshofrat's will. By and large the Austrians had been happy to leave Italy to their Spanish cousins, who bolstered their de jure authority (delegated by Vienna) with the de facto hard power of military garrisons and the soft power of a peninsula-wide network of consistently-cultivated patronage, favour and promotion. Almost all of the great princes - from the Doria and Spinola of Genoa, to the Farnese of Parma, the Medici of Tuscany and the Orsini and Colonna of Rome - were Spanish vassals some way or another, primarily through lands held in Naples, which meant they had a lot to lose by betraying Spanish interests.

The continuous renewal of the Austro-Spanish alliance from 1558 to 1700 meant such ties benefitted Austria too. So long as the family heads in Spain and Austria continued working in tandem, both "masters" ultimately pulled in the same direction. Thus one registers that Italian Imperial vassals provided substantial support in all of Austria's conflicts up to the reign of Heinrich VII, notably the Long Turkish War of 1593-1606. Such assistance is often ignored in history books for it bypassed the Reichstag and other Imperial institutions and went directly to the Hapsburg army and treasury, yet it's legal basis was the feudal tie between those Princes and the Emperor.

Perhaps filling the power vacuum left by Don Carlos II's mental disability, the Emperor Leopold (the Spanish King's uncle and brother-in-law) was especially rigorous in asserting his authority over the 250-300 Imperial fiefs in Italy. In 1678, he invested the Governor of Milan with the power of plenipotentiary for Italy, an office not filled since the days of the Emperor Matthias. With Spanish help (and to the Pope's great discomfort, for the Papacy had appropriated many Imperial fiefs), lists of fiefdoms were drawn up. In 1690-91, Prince Eugene of Savoy-Carignano was put to work levying an imperial tax in Italy to support the war effort. In 1696, Leopold issued an edict mandating all his Italian vassals to present their deeds of enfeoffment and renew their oaths of allegiance within a year and a day on pain of forfeit. In 1703, he legitimized Giovanni Gonzaga as heir to Mantua and Montferrat, and lived to see that fact universally recognized in the 1707 Peace of Milan.

The rise of Imperialism in Vienna became a stickler in the Austro-Spanish partnership, notably in Italy. Leopold and later Otto V and Heinrich VII multiplied titles and honours for those Princes whose support they wanted. Thus Prussia and Bavaria were named Kings and by the late 1720s Hanover, Hesse-Kassel and Julich-Kleves-Berg had joined the Electoral College (with the terrible side-effect of making a tie possible, a risk only broken if Bavaria and the Rhineland were both allowed to vote). While the Bavarian title was largely resisted internationally, Maximilian Emmanuel was eventually humoured with a hollow colonial crown ("King of the Isles of Guyana", otherwise "King of Guyana" or "King of Trinidad") by the Papacy (his son later acquired the crown of the Spanish Netherlands as "King of Belgium", giving the family the solid royal standing it so craved).

In Italy, however, Spanish diplomacy studiously refused similar attempts to make Savoy and Tuscany Kingdoms (1710-1711). Leopold's own son, the Prince-Regent Karl of Spain, worked in tandem with Papacy, France and Great Britain in order to roll back "title inflation". Thus while Vienna pulled in one (Imperialist, German-centric) direction, Spain reacted negatively and pulled in another, sowing the seeds of what would become Carlist Traditionalism.


This severing of agendas was perhaps one of the factors behind the formation of the Spanish-led Italian League in 1720. It was almost as if the princes of Italy had been simply waiting for Don Carlos III to come of age and start reigning. Created by Philip of Anjou, duke of Parma, the League had Don Carlos III as President and did not initially count Tuscany and Savoy in its ranks (Tuscany joining in 1726 and Savoy in 1744).

The anti-Imperialist sentiment behind it was made evident in 1723 when Philip of Parma - with Papal support - proposed a novel take on Leopoldine title inflation. By this project, Don Carlos III would become Emperor of a new Italian Empire, independent of the Holy Roman Empire, and simultaneously elevate all League members (Parma, Modena, etc.) to Kingly status.

Parma no doubt envisioned a glorious future for himself as a monarch in his own right and right-hand man of Don Carlos III in Italy, whose heir he was presumed to be. The Pope meanwhile no doubt sought to exploit the Austro-Spanish split and undermine Imperial authority while/wherever he could. Unsurprising, therefore, the invasive - and wholely illegitimate - transgression that was the Papal investiture of the Medici as Kings of the Etruscans (1724) despite the Medici being vassals of the Empire (Tuscany) and Spain (Sienna).

Don Carlos, meanwhile, spread his wings slowly. The Peace of Brno (also 1724) had seen Spain back away from claims to Hungary in return for the crown of Italy. The tacit trade was this: in return for not founding a rival Italian Empire, Carlos would become King of Italy free of Imperial suzerainty.

Heinrich had seemingly agreed in private, but the ambiguous wording of the subsequent treaty was used as pretext for almost immediate assertion of Imperial authority in Italy. The Vicariate Crisis of 1725 saw Savoy and Tuscany fighting for the office of "Imperial Vicar of Italy", which Savoy renounced and then "took back", in the same way that Heinrich first confirmed and then revoked the Medici Vicariate. To make matters worse, the Imperial Diet intervened, usurping jurisdiction over Italy and denying the Medici.


The end result was Medici Tuscany's entrance into the League and rapprochement with Spain.

In 1726, Don Carlos had himself crowned King of Italy at Pavia in the presence of the Italian princes. The escalation of tensions over political (Imperialism), religious (Heinrich's Byzantine mysticism) and dynastic (the Pragmatic Sanction by which Heinrich sought to leave the inheritance to his daughter, not his Spanish heirs) issues resulted in the Bruderskrieg and 1731 Familienpakt whereby Don Carlos became Holy Roman Emperor. Thus the authority of Madrid and Vienna were concentrated anew in one man, with any vestigial aspirations of Heinrich sidelined by the formalization of the Holy Roman Empire of the Latin Nation and Carlos' coronation by Papal hands in 1743. In a curious about-face, Heinrich now sought to maintain influence in Italy by supplying the Pope with armed forces to check Spanish influence with.

The 1743 devolution of Austria-Hungary had interesting side effects for Italy. The Reichshofrat was renamed the Erzhofrat (Arch-Court Council) or Consilium Aulicum Austriae (Aulic Council of Austria) and its jurisdiction reduced to the affairs of the Erblande (Hapsburg Hereditary Lands). The Emperor's jurisdiction over Italy could no longer be exercised by what would now become, essentially, a vassal state ruled by his son.


[/FONT]

With the formation of the Italian League (1720) and Carlos' coronation as King of Italy (1726)



The Imperial Chancellery (Cancelleria Imperiale dei Latini)

The Imperial Chancellery is the beating heart of the new Imperial apparatus in Italy, taking over from Imperial institutions based in Vienna and Spanish institutions based in Milan.

It is the paperwork division, the bureaucracy, the documentation centre.

It is responsible for all official correspondence involving the Holy Roman Empire of the Latin Nation, its Emperor and his family members in and relating to Italy and Italian affairs.

  • The Imperial and Royal Chancellery (Cancelleria Imperale e Regia), with authority to publish Imperial and royal diplomas, decrees and other documents with public faith, such as deeds of enfeoffment, registration of house laws, changes to house laws,​
  • The Imperial and Royal Diplomatic Corps (Diplomatica Imperiale e Regia), with authority to send, correspond and organize the diplomatic corps of the Emperor,​
  • The Imperial Postmaster General (Mastro Generale delle Poste Imperiali), command of the Imperial post and associated apparatus,​
  • The College of Heralds (Collegio degli araldi), maintenance, interpretation and publishing of heraldic and genealogical documents (chief of which is the Libro d'Oro - the Golden Book of Nobility), armorial bearings, and resolution of issues involving arms, noble status, genealogy, legitimacy, state ceremony and order of precedence.​












The Aulic Council (Consiglio Aulico)

  • Modelled on its Austrian counterpart, it is both a council for state business and as a court to hear cases.
  • Criminal cases involving princes who enjoy Imperial immediacy.
  • Protection of widows, orphans, minors, poor agnates from abuse by other family members.












Prinzipal-Kommissar (imperial Diet envoy), bypassing chancellor.

While they were excluded from the Reichstag, the Italian states were still considered vassals of the emperor, like other states of the empire, and thus subject to certain obligations and jurisdiction. A special Italian section of the Aulic Council was created in 1559. It handled 1,500 cases from Imperial Italy between 1559 and 1806 (out of 140,000 total), with most of those cases coming from later dates.[23][24] Italian states provided significant support in all of the Empire's wars in this time, either under their own princes or as part of the Habsburg territories (such as the Imperial Free City of Trieste, the County of Gorizia and Gradisca, the Duchy of Milan, and later the Grand Duchy of Tuscany). Unlike most of the German states, the Imperial Italian contributions bypassed the Reichstag and other institutions and went directly to the Imperial army and treasury. The Italian states were in large part autonomous, but their lack of representation gave the emperor greater ability to act autonomously with the Italian principalities than the German ones, such as when he decided to simply add the Grand Duchy of Tuscany (officially an imperial fief) to his family's lands after the extinction of the Medici ruling line in 1737.[25] Aside from the Prince-Bishopric of Trent, Piedmont-Savoy was the only independent Italian state represented in the Reichstag and also the only one to be part of the circle system (being within the Upper Rhenish Circle; the Habsburg possessions of Trieste and Gorizia-Gradisca were within the Austrian Circle, as was Trent). Thus despite being opposed to the Habsburg family, it still emphasized its imperial privileges to establish itself as suzerain over smaller surrounding lordships.

Emperor Leopold I increasingly asserted his rights over the imperial fiefdoms of Italy from the 1660s with the decline of Spanish power and more overt intervention of the French. In 1687, a new plenipotentiary of Italy was appointed, a position that had been left vacant for over a century prior (the powers of the office had instead been exercised haphazardly by the Aulic Council). In 1690, Prince Eugene of Savoy tried to levy an imperial tax over Italy to pay for war expenses, the first time such a thing had been done. Then, in 1696, Leopold issued an edict mandating all of his Italian vassals to renew their oaths of allegiance within a year and a day on pain of forfeit. The renewal of fiefdoms incensed the papacy, some of whose own vassals now dug out ancient documents ostensibly proving them to be vassals of the Emperor. Smaller states of Italy saw the Emperor as their protector against larger territories like Savoy and the papacy.[27] Imperial authority strengthened throughout the 18th century, with the duchies of Milan and Mantua passing to the Habsburg family as vacant imperial fiefs during the War of the Spanish Succession, the end of the War of the Quadruple Alliance reconfirming the statuses of Tuscany, Modena-Reggio, and Parma-Piacenza as imperial fiefs,[28] and the Habsburgs continuing to rule the Italian territories of their hereditary lands (roughly the modern provinces of Trentino-Alto Adige and the Austrian Littoral). Piedmont-Savoy, on the other hand, remained defiant of Imperial authority despite officially participating in the diet and the duke receiving the title of "Royal Highness" from the Emperor in 1693.


As compensation, Charles VI conferred on him the honorary position as vicar-general of Italy, worth 140,000 gulden a year, and an estate at Siebenbrunn in Lower Austria said to be worth double that amount.












----------

The Imperial Aulic Council was based in the Hofburg, the Habsburg residence in Vienna. It served the interests of the Habsburg emperors both as a council for state business and as a court to hear cases from throughout the empire. The council especially considered disputes from regimes directly under the emperor's authority, such as imperial cities, imperial knights, and the principalities in northern Italy that were not represented in the Reichstag or the Circles (Kreise). Staffed by about two dozen judges, the court mediated disputed between (or among) subjects, their princes, and the emperor. Its purpose was to carry out the role of the emperor as sovereign and as mediator among his subjects. Unlike the reichskammergericht, the Aulic council considered criminal matters. It also adjudicated feudal relationships, which continued long after their medieval functions had atrophied. If a territorial regime fell into debt to the imperial government, the council began bankruptcy investigations that granted imperial comissions the right to direct interference into local matters. to enforce the council's decisions, imperial commissions often set themselves up in the region under investigation, to monitor the situation. the court even provided a method for the emperor to depose a ruler who failed to live up to his obligations. Many appellants found it was quicker and cheaper to bring a case to the aulic council rather than to the Chamber Court.

He should not only investigate the complaints, but also "reorganize" the count's household and government. Additionally, the Reichshofrat enabled him to arrest the count "in case of necessity". (..) Undisputedly, the criminal jurisdiction over the immediate subjects of the empire was vested exclusively in the emperor and, through him, in the Reichshofrat.

---

chancellery responsible for communications involving lands and family members.

Court post (Hofpost)

Imperial Postmaster General

Public Peace (Landfrieden),

----

Moser aptly called the Reichshofrat the emperor's right arm, as it was crucial for the emperor's role in the Empire. Some of these responsibilities made the Reichshofrat more relevant for dynastic issues. IFirst of all, the Reichshofrat administered the emperor's feudal overlordship. It was the sole institution responsible for all matters that concerned the empire's feudal ties. This included arranging the enfeoffment of vassals, dealing with requests that concerned feudal law and with frictions that stemmed from the Empire's feudal structure. This function of the Reichshofrat was relevant for princes who argued about partitions of land or about succession arrangements - the most common occassions for dispute in the dynastic family.












  • Samtbelehnung (collective enfeoffment), a legal instrument most commonly used by dynasties with several separately ruling branches. Under this arrangement if one of the branches died out, its possessions would automaticall revert to the other family branch, ensuring that the dynasty's fiefs remained in the family for a slong as famil memers were available. The joint right of inheritance safeguarded via Imperial Law.
  • The Reichshofrat additionally also administered the prerogatives of the emperor. These were a range of powers tied to the imperial office. One of the emperor's prerogatives was his role as Obervormund (supreme guardian) for all those who enjoyed Reichsunmittelbarkeit. Dynastic politics sometimes required underage princes to take mature responsibilitties, by taking office or signing treaties. In that case, the faily had to provide for a suitable guardina. This could be a mother, a relative or a neighbouring prince. However, as Obervormund, the emperor was ultimately responsible for these arrangements. family disputes lead to appeals to the Reichshofrat.
  • By obtaining an official seal of approval the family could safeguard the arrangemenet against other pretenders to avoid conflict. the emperor could furthermore grant an underage prince a Mundigkeitserklarung (declaration of adulthood), allowing a minor to take mature responsibilities.
  • Changes to house law and succession need to demonstrate all Imperial stakeholders were respected in their rights.
 
Last edited:


THE DUKE
D. Teodósio II and the Brigantine House


1616 A.D.



"Os Reinos e os Imperios poderosos,
Que em grandeza no mundo mais crescêrão;
Ou por valor de esfôrço florecêrão,
Ou por Barões nas letras espantosos."

"Teve Grecia Themistocles famosos;
Os Scipiões a Roma engrandecêrão;
Doze Pares a França gloria derão;
Cides a Hespanha, e Laras bellicosos."

"Ao nosso Portugal, que agora vemos
Tão differente de seu ser primeiro,
Os vossos derão honra e liberdade."

"E em vós, grão successor e novo herdeiro
Do Braganção Estado, ha mil extremos
Iguaes ao sangue, e móres que a idade."


Os Reinos e os Imperios poderosos
Sonnet by Luís Vaz de Camões, ca. 1579


THE TRAGEDY OF ALCÁCER QUIBIR (1578)

eptasti per scuta puer, wrote Claudian in his panegyric to Honorius, in reverence of the Emperor's late father, Theodosius I. "As a child thou didst crawl among shields," were the Roman poet's words, exalting the virtues and honors of a young prince who had grown up among military glory and triumph. Twelve hundred years later, an anonymous lettered courtier, inspired by the classicizing winds of the Portuguese Renaissance, would repeat Claudian's words. Only this time, the object of adoration and exaltation would not be Honorius or Theodosius the Great, but another Theodosius, his namesake, who, even though he was born more than a thousand years after the former's death, still bore the ancient name of emperors and saints. This Theodosius, too, had known the glories and dangers of battle in his childhood. He was only ten when he was put through his baptism of fire in the hot and unforgiving sands of Morocco. Only ten when he commanded his father's troops at the face of adversity. Only ten when he, once all was lost, mounted a horse and charged alone against the enemy ranks, a young boy's battlecry piercing the crimson field to shame all others. Only ten when he watched his King vanish amidst the Mahometan blades, leading to the grave the flower of Portuguese chivalry. Only ten when he survived, where countless others had perished.

This Theodosius was Dom Teodósio de Bragança (or Theodosio, in the contemporary spelling). Born on April 28th, 1568, he was the eldest son of the Duke of Braganza, the saintly D. João I, and D. Catarina de Guimarães, Infanta of Portugal, a granddaughter of King D. Manuel. From his father, D. Teodósio was descended in the male line from the House of Burgundy and, consequently, the Royal Capetian House of France. From his mother, he boasted of recent Avis blood, affording him an interesting place in the line of succession to the Portuguese Crown. From infancy, as the heir to the Dukedom of Braganza and all of its associated titles, lands, incomes and privileges, D. Teodósio had been destined to greatness, as foretold by his ancient name. When he was four, his cousin the King of Portugal, D. Sebastião, invested him as Duke of Barcelos, following the dynastic traditions of the House of Braganza. The King did not tarry to take his little cousin as a royal page soon thereafter. Split between the splendid royal court in Lisbon and the equally splendid ducal court in Vila Viçosa, D. Teodósio would grow up among the finest that Portugal had to offer.

Tragically, the young Duke of Barcelos would be forced to grow up too fast. The King, D. Sebastião, was intent on continuing his predecessors' godly work and take the cross across the sea in Africa. The Duke of Braganza, D. João I, who had been made Constable of Portugal in 1576 (in replacement of his cousin and brother-in-law, Infante D. Duarte, Duke of Guimarães), had already embarked on a short Moroccan campaign at the King's behest before, testifying to his holiness and piety. When the time came to join the King's crusade, however, the Constable was struck down with illness. Prevented from joining his liege in Africa, D. João sent in his stead his ten year old son and heir, the Duke of Barcelos, to represent the Constable of Portugal and the House of Braganza in the field of battle by the King's side. D. Teodósio would be accompanied by his uncle, D. Jaime de Bragança, in the prime of his eighteen years of age, who would assist him in leading the might and power of the Brigantine State against the heathens in Morocco, in the name of Christ and Church.



D. SEBASTIÃO OF PORTUGAL
1554-1578?

D. Teodósio was thus present in the field for the Battle of Alcácer-Quibir, when D. Sebastião's army was encircled and completely annihilated by the forces of the Sultan of Morocco. Alcácer-Quibir was a disaster of unprecedented scale. The King's forces, heavily outnumbered by the enemy, had counted with 23,000 men. Out of these, eight thousand were slain in battle, in a bloody page of the history of the Portuguese nobility, while the remaining fifteen thousand were taken captive by the Moroccans. Only one hundred, out of twenty three thousand, were able to escape the encirclement and fall back to the coast. The Duke of Barcelos could do nothing but withstand the Mahometan onslaught, and withstand it he did, with honor and courage beyond his age. Legend has it that when Dom Sebastião ordered his young cousin to retreat, the boy steadfastly refused to do so. Seizing the reins of a war horse, he galloped towards the enclosing enemy lines. The Sultan of Morocco was reportedly so impressed by the boy's bravery that he took him prisoner. An embellishment it may be (though one would be unwise to question this account in the ducal court), but the fact remained that the young Duke of Barcelos had survived the massacre at Alcácer-Quibir with his honor intact, sporting a head wound to prove his valor and sacrifice. Others were not so lucky. The King himself had disappeared in the fighting, while D. Teodósio's uncle, D. Jaime de Bragança, was among the dead, alongside many of the Brigantine vassals, knights and soldiers. A greater tragedy for the House of Braganza had been avoided thanks to D. Teodósio's conduct and the Moroccan sultan's mercy, but Alcácer-Quibir had been a disaster nonetheless, not in the least because the Brigantine heir now found himself a captive at a crucial time in his country's history.

The Duke of Barcelos would remain in Moroccan captivity for an entire year. Back home, his father D. João received the news of Alcácer-Quibir with astonishment, sharing in the shock with the rest of the nation. In order to see his eldest son and his vassals freed, the Duke of Braganza began preparations to offer a king's ransom. Fearing for his child, he enlisted the help of Phillip II of Spain to intercede with the Moroccans to secure D. Teodósio's release. This would prove to be a mistake, as Alcácer-Quibir had unleashed upon the country the sequence of events that would ultimately lead to the Portuguese succession crisis, following the extinction of the male line of the House of Avis. Preoccupied with securing his son's release, D. João paid only little attention to securing his dynastic rights to Portugal, as the legitimate heir to the Portuguese throne. His wife the Duchess, D. Catarina of Portugal, was far more assertive of the true line of succession. The Infanta would seek, in the coming months, to claim her rights to the Portuguese Crown; if not for herself, a woman, then for her son, D. Teodósio, as a great-grandson of King D. Manuel I and grandson of Infante D. Duarte, Duke of Guimarães (whereas Phillip II was descended from a daughter of D. Manuel, rather than a son).

All of D. Catarina's attempts were futile, however. The Moroccan sultan had released D. Teodósio from captivity in August 1579, safely and without a ransom, in honor of his nobility and courage in the battlefield. Nevertheless, the boy was delayed in his homecoming by the order of Phillip II, who recognized in young Duke of Barcelos a dangerous rival in the game for the Portuguese throne. Despite his youth, D. Teodósio's claim was superior, although Phillip II pretended it was not so. Keeping the Braganza heir away from Portugal, while the proper line of succession was established, was one of Phillip's priorities. At his command, the Spanish Dukes of Medina Sidónia, who were cousins to the Braganzas through an early century marriage, withheld D. Teodósio in their estate, as generous hosts to an honored guest, even though they were in truth jailors to an inconvenient prisoner. From Moroccan captivity, the Duke of Barcelos now found himself in Spanish captivity; at least the Sultan had had no ulterior motive for depriving him of his freedom. With D. Teodósio conveniently out of the way, Phillip II was recognized as King of Portugal and the Algarves by the Cortes in Tomar, after invading the kingdom. The Duke of Braganza, D. João, was among those who bent the knee, much to his wife's chagrin. D. Catarina would never cease advocating for her line's dynastic rights.



DOM THEODOSIO II
The Duke of Braganza portrayed as a young man

With Phillip II firmly enthroned as King of Portugal, the young Duke of Barcelos was at last allowed to return home. One might think that his treatment at the hands of the Spanish, when combined with the influence of his indignant and uncompromising mother, might have made him sour to the prospect of Habsburg rule. Perhaps surprisingly, that would not be the case. Over his life, D. Teodósio de Bragança would serve as a faithful and loyal vassal of the Philippine dynasty, becoming a crucial source of legitimacy for the new regime simply due to not contesting their right to rule. Of course, the Braganzas did not walk away empty-handed. Phillip II had been reluctantly generous in his approach to the Brigantine House, offering them what he saw as a series of boons and gifts (whereas, in Vila Viçosa, D. Catarina viewed these grants as their right, even though her dynastic claim was disregarded by Phillip). The most generous gifts had been offered during the succession crisis. If the Braganzas recognized him as King of Portugal, Phillip II had promised to grant them a marriage to his eldest son, Prince Diogo of Asturias (or, alternatively, D. Teodósio's marriage to one of his daughters), the hereditary post of Grand Master of the Order of Christ, and the crown and royalty of Brazil, to be bestowed upon Duke D. João I and his successors in perpetuity. This offer the Duke of Braganza had refused, at the behest of his wife, as they still entertained the notion of pressing their own claims to the Portuguese Crown. When D. João at last recognized Phillip II as King, his new sovereign was still generous in his grants. Many of the expansive Brigantine rights and privileges date from his reign, and many more were indefinitely renewed. For D. João's second son, Phillip II reserved the Castilian Marquisate of Frechilla, while the Duke himself was made a Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece and a Grandee of Spain. These attempts at appeasement failed to impress the Duchess of Braganza, but were sufficient to ensure that the Dukes would pose no obstacle to Philippine rule in Portugal.

As a matter of fact, D. Teodósio also benefited from Philippine largess. In 1582, when he was fourteen, he was made Constable of Portugal, succeeding his ailing father in the position. The boon was not only a further honor bestowed upon the House of Braganza, effectively making the position hereditary, but also recognized the reputation for military prowess enjoyed by the Duke of Barcelos, as a survivor and veteran of Alcácer-Quibir. "In you, grand successor and heir to the Brigantine State, there are a thousand feats, equal to your blood, but greater than your age," wrote Luís de Camões, the greatest and brightest poet ever produced by Portugal, in a sonnet dedicated to D. Teodósio shortly before his death. Camões wrote of the changing of the times, and of the great men and heroes that made the empires and kingdoms of old flourish: Themistocles in Ancient Greece, the Scipii in Rome, the twelve Louises of France, concluding with the exaltation of the Braganza heir. Camões' high praise was not entirely unwarranted. Dom Teodósio II succeeded his father as Duke of Braganza at age fifteen in 1583, spending the remainder of his minority under the regency of his mother, D. Catarina. Although the Infanta was a fervent opponent of Phillip II, having even declined an offer of marriage by the King in order to preserve her dynastic rights, the new Duke of Braganza served him well. Indeed, both his loyalty and his reputed martial prowess would be put to the ultimate test in 1589, when an English expedition led by Francis Drake and Sir John Norris made landfall in Portugal, determined to exact revenge for the attack of the Spanish Armada in the previous year. The English Counter-Armada had three main goals: to destroy the remnants of the Spanish Atlantic fleet and to seize their treasure fleet, to establish a permanent presence in the Azores to the west... and to raise a revolt in Portugal to overthrow Phillip II and install Dom António, the Prior of Crato, on the Portuguese throne.

As Constable of Portugal, the responsibility of leading the defense of the kingdom against the foreign incursion fell to D. Teodósio II. The English first landed in Peniche, some forty miles north of Lisbon, where they forced the defenders sent forth by the Archduke Albert, Viceroy of Portugal, to surrender (though the commander would only agree to surrender to the Prior of Crato in person, rather than the English invaders). The Counter-Armada was met with the apathy of most of the Portuguese nobility. Although Dom António failed to stir them into rebellion, being an unpopular figure himself, the Portuguese were not eager to join the Spanish resistance. The same could not be said about D. Teodósio II. The Duke of Braganza set out to Lisbon with twenty noblemen and his personal guard of seventy halberdiers, two hundred lancers and over a thousand infrantrymen. The Constable's arrival not only brought much needed reinforcements to the defenders, but was also a crippling blow to the legitimacy of the Prior of Crato. The Braganzas, the greatest of the kingdom, had declared for Phillip II. The rest of the nobility would soon follow. With an English assault on Lisbon having been repelled, the invaders had retreated to nearby Cascais, where Drake's fleet was anchored. D. Teodósio marched out of Lisbon to meet them in battle and besiege the enemy position in Cascais. Under pressure, the English and the Prior of Crato left by sea, never to return. A boy no longer, the Duke of Braganza had consecrated his military reputation and proven, once and for all, his loyalty and value to the King.

English Armada

Marriage
 
Last edited:
1749 The Almanach:
The Crowned Heads of Europe

Possible Cardinals
  • Carlo Gonzaga of Mantua, born 1692, aged 57, a prelate in Rome, canon of St. Peter, governor of the Papal States in Todi (1729), Sabina (1730), Fabriano (1731), Camerino (1737), Ancona (1743), Citavecchia (1744), etc. etc.
  • His nephews, Filippo and Innocenzo Gonzaga of Mantua, born 1720 and 1722.
  • Philipp Ludwig of Denmark, born 1724, son of a Catholic mother, potentially raised Catholic, connected via his Orléans mother with France, Tuscany, Modena and Poland.
  • Heinrich Stuart of Brunswick, born 1730, son of a proud Catholic family, now in service to the NGF but well connected with southern Catholic elites,
  • Louis Eugene of Wurttemberg, born 1731, son of a notable Catholic convert, brother to the "reigning" duke of Wurttemberg,
  • The Infante Dom Pedro of Portugal, born 1717, aged 42, Grand Prior of Castro and Lord of the Infantado.
Romanov Russia
Dynastic Overview: The reign of Peter the Great ushered in many changes - amongst them, his son's marriage to a foreign princess from the oldest and proudest of west European royalty opened the doors for greater intermarriage between the instinctively introspective Romanovs and the créme de la créme of the west. The Empress Yelisaveta might privately mourn Versailles, but she did her duty and gave the Romanovs blue-blooded heirs to rule the Russias. Now her son comes of age and a new Empress must be found.

Meanwhile the Tsar's sisters, the Tseravenas, were also married abroad and produced additional heirs to shore up the family line.

The family, as of 1749:

Pyotr Alekseyevich Romanov (1672-1732), PETER THE GREAT, Emperor and Tsar of All Russia, m1. Eudoxia Lopukhina (divorced and exiled to monastery), m2. Anna Ivanovna (1672-), born Anna Mons, a Dutchwoman of mercantile origins, now Dowager Empress of Russia,
  • [1m] ALEXEI II PETROVICH (1690-, a. 59), Emperor and Tsar of All Russia, m. 1723 Yelisaveta Petrovna (1695-, a.54), born Maria Louise Elisabeth d'Orléans, a French princesse du sang,
    • Tsesarevich Ivan Alekseyevich (1724-, a. 25), m. Tsesarevna Anna, née Maria Vittoria of Savoy,
      • Miscarried daughter (1748),
    • Tsarevna Maria Alekseyevna (1732-, a. 15), weak, but survived,
    • Stillborn son (1734),
    • Stillborn daughter (1735),
    • Tsarevich Constantine Alekseyevich (1736-, a. 13), the hoped-for spare,
  • [2m] Tsarevna Anna Petrovna (1705-1749), m1. Charles Frederick (1700-1737), Duke of Holstein-Gottorp-Lauenburg, m2. Duke Adolf Frederick of Holstein-Gottorp-Eutin, with issue from both marriages.
  • [2m] Tsarevna Natalya Petrovna (1712-1748) m. Frederick, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, by whom she has a daughter.
Scandinavia (Oldenburger Kalmar Union)
Dynastic Overview: The Kalmar Union was forged anew by marriage in 1729. Prince Georg became King Christian VII in 1723 and patiently waited for Queen Christina to come of age. His heir presumptive was his nephew, Philip Ludwig, a posthumous baby passed over in the succession with universal support (everyone wanting the union with Sweden). This unfortunate boy was demoted at the age of ten, when Queen Christina produced a son. Four daughters followed. As the crown prince (heir apparent) was not of perfect health, Philip Ludwig was still relevant as a possible husband for his cousins, to guarantee Danish-Swedish succession would continue together. Only when the King and Queen had a second, perfectly healthy son in 1745 did it become clear Philip Ludwig was now an inconvenience, a problem not a solution. There are suggestions to imprison him (so he dies childless), push him into the Catholic church (so he dies childless) or marry him to an Orthodox princess (so he renounces all succession rights and leaves forever).

As of 1749, the family is:

Frederick IV (1671-1723), King of Denmark and Norway, m. Louise of Mecklenburg-Gustrow,
  • Christian VI (1699-1723), King of Denmark, died of the Johor Flea, b. Christina of Sweden,
  • Frederick Karl (1701-1723), died of the Johor Flea, m. Charlotte Agláe d'Orléans, s Roman Catholic,
    • Philipp Ludwig (1724-, a. 25), Philippe Louis "the Orphan Boy", Hereditary Prince of Denmark and Norway 1724-1734, still relevant as a spare until Prince Gustav's birth in 1745 made him superfluous,​
  • CHRISTIAN VII OF OLDENBURG (1703-, a. 46), born Georg, King of Denmark and Norway, m. 1729 CHRISTINA II of Pfalz-Zweibrucken (1714-, a. 35), Queen of Sweden, Duchess of Bremen and Verden, etc.
    • Karl Frederick Christian Gustav (1734-, a. 15), weak but survived (mentally unbalanced), Hereditary Prince from birth,​
    • Frederike Charlotte (1735-, a. 14), named for her grandfathers,​
    • Georgina Christina (1737-, a. 12), named for her parents,​
    • Hedwig Sophia Louisa (1738 - , a. 11), named for her grandmothers,​
    • Ulrika Katharina Amalia (1743-, a. 6),​
    • Erik Gustav (1745-, a. 4), of perfect health.​
  • Charlotte Amalia (1706 -, a. 43), m. Edward of Orange-Nassau, Duke of York and Albany, with issue.
Holstein-Gottorp [Scandinavian] and -Lauenburg [NGF]
Dynastic Overview: The Holstein-Gottorps were influential courtiers in Scandinavian politics, with strong blood ties to Denmark and Sweden. Their power was broken by King Christian VII, with Holstein being detached from the Holy Roman Empire and absorbed into Denmark. By his mercy, the family later recovered some estates. Possession of the Duchy of Lauenburg, under the North German Federation, technically preserved the family's standing as Reichsfurst.

Lacking sons of his own, Duke Charles Frederick intended to marry his daughter to his cousin and agnatic heir Adolf Frederick. With the Duke's premature death in 1737, Adolf Frederick instead married Anna Petrovna, the illustrious widow of Gottorp. It was a marriage of both passion and practicaly. The new Duke got an Imperial wife of proven fertility, the Dowager got to keep her position and the family, her dowry. Meanwhile the Saxe-Lauenburg lands in the North German Federation passed to Adolf's brother, Georg, who was betrothed to the daughter of the dead Duke, thus organizing the family into two closely-related branches: one Danish, one German.

As of 1749, the family is:

Christian Albert, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp, m. Frederica Amalia of Denmark, daughter of King Frederick III of Denmark and Sophie Amalie of Brunswick-Luneburg. Their children:
  • Sophie Amalie (1670-1710) m. Prince Augustus William, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel, a homosexual, without issue.
  • Frederick IV of Holstein-Gottorp-Lauenburg (1671- after 1717), called "the Gottorp Fury", Duke of Saxe-Lauenburg 1707, Lord of Hadeln, m. Hedwig Sophia of Sweden,
    • Charles Frederick (1700-1737), Duke of Holstein-Lauenburg, Heir of Sweden 1700-1714, and again 1723-1734, m. Tsarevna Anna Petrovna of Russia,
      • Anna Christina of Holstein-Gottorp-Lauenburg (1732-, a.17), m. Georg Ludwig of Holstein-Gottorp-Eutin, below.
  • Christian August of Holstein-Gottorp-Eutin (1673-[1726?]), m. Albertina Frederica of Baden-Durlach, of Swedish royal blood,
    • Hedwig Sophie Auguste (1705-, a. 44), Abbess of Herford,
    • Charles Augustus (1706-1727), without issue.
    • Frederica Amalia (1708 - , a. 41), a nun at Quedlinburg,
    • Anne (1709-, a. 40), m. Wilhelm of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg (1701-1771), without issue.
    • Adolf Frederick (1710- , a. 39), Duke of Holstein-Gottorp-Eutin, m. Tsarevna Anna Petrovna of Russia (1705-1749), Dowager of Lauenburg,
      • Karl Peter Ulrich (1743 - , a. 6),
      • Johann Peter (1744 - , a. 5)
      • Anna Elizabeth (1746 -, a. 3,),
      • Katharina (1747-, a. 2),
    • Frederick August (1711-, a. 38), Bishop of Lubeck,
    • Johanna Elisabeth (1712 -, a. 37), m. Christian August, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst, a Prussian (NGF) general.
      • Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst (1729 - , a. 18), m. Prince William of Prussia, with issue.
      • Frederick Augustus (1734 - , a. 15).
    • Georg Ludwig (1719-, a. 30), Duke of Holstein-Lauenburg, m. Anna Christina of Holstein-Gottorp-Lauenburg,
      • Karl Frederick (1747-, a. 2),
      • Alberet Christian (1749-, a.0),
  • Marie Elisabeth (1678 - , a. 67), Abbess of Quedlinburg.
Hanover (Welfs of Brunswick-Luneburg) [NGF]
Dynastic Overview: Elector Georg II spent his life dreaming of crowns: Great Britain, Sweden, Morocco. All evaded him. He also lost Saxe-Lauenburg, Bremen and Verden, and wasted money buying out his Brunswick-Bevern relatives so he could swap Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel with the Stuarts. His greatest success is in becoming father-in-law, as well as uncle, of the Reichspresident of the North German Federation. By the grace of God, he managed to produce a son, preventing Hanover's complete absorption into the Hohenzollern state.

As of 1749, the family is:

Georg I Ludwig (1660-1727) Elector of Hanover, Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg, "King of Morocco" 1724 m. Sophia Dorothea of Brunswick-Celle, by whom:
  • GEORG II August (1683-, a. 66), Elector of Hanover, Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg, m. 1704/1705 Ulrika Eleonora of Sweden (1688 - , a. 61), an aunt of Queen Christina II of Sweden,
    • Amelia Sophia Eleonora (1711-, a. 38) m. Frederick II of Prussia, with issue.
    • Frederick Ludwig (1712-, a. 37), m. Louisa Ulrika of Prussia (1720- , a. 29),
      • Sophia Dorothea (1738 - , a. 9), a deaf girl,
      • Ulrika Eleonora (1744 -, a. 5),
      • Wilhelmina Frederike (1746 - , a. 3),
      • Sophia Maria (1748 - , a. 1),
      • Georg Ludwig (1750 - ),
      • Georgina Maria (1751 - ),
    • Louisa (1722-, a. 27), simple of mind,
    • Elizabeth Sophia (1724-, a. 25),
    • A stillborn son (1726).
  • Sophia Dorothea (1687-), m. Frederick William I of Prussia, with issue.
Brunswick (Stuarts of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel) [NGF] and Este of Naples
Dynastic Overview: James Francis Edward Stuart grew up as a pretender in exile, with support from Catholic princes. His reign as King of the Rif and then Morocco proved to be short-lived. He exchanged Morocco with Hanover and retired to Germany, where he promised to leave England alone and was invested as Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel. He married the eldest daughter of the previous ruler and thereafter lived a quiet life in service to the North German Federation. His wife's Lutheran religion made coexistence with the German Protestants easier, but naturally increased British suspicion of the family and their activities (it was better for the Orange-Nassau if the Jacobites remained Catholic, at least outwardly).

The obstinate deism of his son, Bonnie Prince Charlie, led to his discrete expulsion from the Hofburg Military Academy c. 1743. His son Henry, nevertheless, is considered a likely future Cardinal. A sign there is still some affection for the family among old friends in Spain, Modena and the Catholic world at large.

Duke Jakob' sister Louisa also got a happy ending. During his brief reign in Morocco he married her to a filthy rich cousin, a Marquis from Naples. Louisa was thus spared the cold northern climates and got to spend the rest of her life enjoying the familiar delights of Spain and Italy.


As of 1745, the family is:

King James III Stuart, King of England, Scotland and Ireland, m2. Maria Beatrice Eleonora Anna Margherita Isabella d'Este (1658-1718), known as Mary of Modena, and fathered on her:
  • JAMES FRANCIS EDWARD STUART (1688 - , a. 61), called the Old Pretender, King of the Rif 1721, later King of Morocco, then Duke Jakob Franz of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel 1724, now Jacques François, Comté de Neuchatel 1747, m. Elisabeth Christine of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel (1691-, a. 58), a Lutheran, eldest daughter of previous Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel.
    • Charles Edward Stuart (1725 - , a. 24), Karl, the Young Pretender, otherwise 'Bonnie Prince Charlie', discretely expelled from the Hofburg Military Academy, m. Anna Amelia of Prussia (1723 - , a.22),​
    • Henry Benedict Stuart (1730 -, a. 19), Heinrich, destined for the Church.​
  • Louisa Maria Teresa Stuart (1692 -, a. 57 ) m. 1723 Borso Luigi d'Este (1700-, a. 49), Marquis of Scandiano, Montecchio and Castelnuovo, Grandee of Spain, owner of the Palazzo Zevallos Stigliano in Naples, commander of note in Morocco.
    • Francesco Odoardo d'Este (1726-, a. 23), otherwise Don Francisco Eduardo de Este y Stuart, a graduate of the Hofburg Military Academy,
    • Beatrice Maria Teresa d'Este (1727-, a. 22),
    • Isabella Luigia d'Este (1728 - , a. 19),
    • Enrichetta Angela d'Este (1731 - , a. 18),
    • Benedetta d'Este (1734 - , a. 15), born blind.
Julich-Kleve-Berg (Vaudémont) [NGF]
The House of Vaudémont-Lorraine has had it rough for several generations. A cruel peace saw the family lose its ancestral homeland - the Duchies of Lorraine and Bar - and be compensated with new lands nearby. The Triple Duchies of Julich, Kleve and Berg are not far from "home", and well situated between the Netherlands, Rhineland and north Germany. They're not Lorraine, however, and never will be.

Nevertheless, Duke Leopold accepted his fate with grace and the family has loyally served the North German Federation ever since.

Duke Leopold was survived by 5 children. The eldest and youngest daughters hold (formerly?) prestigious - and influential - positions as Sovereign Princesses of Imperial Abbeys. The middle daughter, Elisabeth, will one day be Queen of France. Through her, the family will one day rule over Lorraine and Bar again. The elder son, Francis Stephen, has ruled quietly and proudly as Duke. His brother shows himself a worthy deputy. Both brothers married Roman Catholic noblewomen (their famously anti-Protestant mother insisted upon it!) with strong ties to north German nobility, and the family continues through them.


As of 1749, the family is:

Charles V (1643-1690), born Charles Leopold Nicholas Sixtus, Duke of Lorraine and Bar, a Hapsburg general, m. Archduchess Eleanora Maria Josepha of Austria (1653-1697), Dowager Queen of Poland. During their years of exile, the family resided in exile in Vienna. He fathered by her:
  • Leopold (1679-1729), born Leopold Joseph Charles Dominique Agapet Hyacinthe, Duke of Lorraine and Bar, later Duke of Julich-Kleve-Berg 1724, a Hapsburg general, m. Élisabeth Charlotte d'Orléans (1676-1744), a famous enemy of Protestants and Jews,​
    • Élisabeth Charlotte Gabrièle (1700 - , a. 49), Abbess of Remiremont,
    • Leopold Clement Charles (1707-1723), Hereditary Prince, died prematurely,
    • FRANCIS STEPHEN (1708-, a. 41), Duke of Julich-Kleve-Berg, m. Theodora of Hesse-Darmstadt (1706-, a. 43), a Catholic cousin of the Empress Frederike, her father was also an important Hapsburg general,
      • Francis Stephen (1727 - , a. 22),
      • Élisabeth Leopoldina (1732 -, a. 17),
      • Élisabeth Theodora (1733-, a. 16),
      • Stillborn son (1736),
      • Charles Nicholas Hyacinth (1741-, a. 8),
      • Élisabeth Josepha (1742 -, a. 7),
      • Philip Alexander (1745-, a. 4),
    • Elisabeth Therese (1711 - , a. 48), m. Louis Philippe, Dauphin of France, with issue.
    • Charles Alexander Emmanuel (1712 -, a 37), a general and administrator, m. Anna Maria of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen (1707-, a. 40), of the Catholic Hohenzollerns,
      • Charlotte Élisabeth (1737-, a. 10),
      • Maximilian Meinrad (1738-, a. 9), weak, but survived,
      • Nicolette Gabrielle (1741-, a. 8),
      • Catherine Renata (1747 -, a. 2 ),
      • Charles Maximilian (1748 - , a. 1),
      • Joseph Alexander (1749 - , a. 0),
    • Anne Charlotte (1714-, a. 35), Abbess at Essen.
  • Charles (1680-1715), born Charles Joseph John Anthony Ignatius Felix, Archbishop-Elector of Trier, Prince-Bishop of Osnabruck, Bishop of Olomouc.
Wurttemberg & Baden-Durlach (HU) & Brandenburg-Ansbach (NGF)
The Wurttembergers and Baden-Durlach were the two chief Lutheran families of south Germany. The death of Duke Eberhard Ludwig in 1733, however, resulted in the succession of his Catholic cousin, Charles Alexander, according to Salic Law. This was rather fortuitous considering Wurttembeg's position as part of the Harmonious Union, lead by a Catholic Emperor and his Jesuit councillors. Recently the young Duke Charles Eugene showed enough force to show himself a man full grown, anticipating the end of his mother's Regency and marry his cousin Luise (old Eberhard's granddaughter), thus keeping her money in the family.

The Baden-Durlach siblings fast approach maturity and are expected to make good marriages thanks to their good looks, royal background and far-ranging family connections. Raised Lutheran (typical for Baden-Durlach), their proximity to Nuremberg and their mother's Catholic relatives in Hungary makes conversion an easy prospect.

As of 1745, the family is:

William Louis (1647-1677), Duke of Wurttemberg, m. Magdalena Sybilla of Hesse-Darmstadt, by whom:
  • Eberhard Ludwig (1676-1733), Duke of Wurttemberg, m. Johanna Elisabeth of Baden-Durlach (1680-1757),
    • Frederick Ludwig (1698-1731), Hereditary Prince of Wurttemberg, m. 1716 Henrietta Maria of Brandenburg-Schwedt (1702-),
      • Luise Friedrike (1722-, a.27), m. Duke Charles Eugene, her cousin, and entered the Roman Catholic church.
  • Magdalena Wilhelmine (1677-1742), m. Charles III William (d. 1738), Margrave of Baden-Durlach,
    • Frederick (1703-1732), Hereditary Prince of Baden-Durlach, m. Princess Charlotte Rákóczi (1706-1738),
      • Jacoba Magdalena (1727-, a. 22),
      • Francis William (1730- a. 19), Margrave of Baden-Durlach.
William's brother Frederick Charles (1652-1697), Duke of Wurttemberg-Winnental, m. Eleonora Juliana of Brandenburg-Ansbach (1663-1724), by whom:
  • Charles Alexander (1684-1737), Duke of Wurttemberg, a convert to Roman Catholicism, m. Maria Augusta of Thurn and Taxis (1706 -, a. 39), Dowager and Regent of Wurttemberg,
    • CHARLES EUGENE (1728 - , a. 21), Duke of Wurttemberg, m. Luise Friederike of Wurttemberg (1722 - , a. 27), his cousin.
    • Louis Eugene (1731-, a. 18),
    • Frederick II Eugene (1732-, a. 17),
    • Augusta Elisabeth (1734-, a. 15),
  • Henry Frederick (1687-1734), a soldier for the Dutch until 1713, without issue.
  • Maximilian Emanuel (1689-1709), "best and truest" friend of Karl XII of Sweden, without issue.
  • Frederick Louis (1690-1734), a soldier for hire, m. Ursula Katharina von Altenbockum, for money, without issue.
  • Christiane Charlotte (1694-1729), m. William Frederick (d. 1723), Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach,
    • Charles William Frederick (1712-, a. 37), Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach, m. Maria Amalia of Hesse-Kassel (d. in childbirth 1744). b. Frederica Caroline of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (1735-, a. 14),
Hesse-Kassel (HU)
The Hesse family is large and boasts several branches. Traditionally, the Hesse-Kassel were staunch Protestants (Calvinists), but in the recent generation the male heir (a nephew) has converted to Roman Catholicism. The tension over this is marked by both Fredericks, uncle and nephew, fighting an arm's race on the marriage bed: who can father boys for Hesse-Kassel? The old Landgrave is old and is fated to fail - his wife will die in childbirth, with the dreamt-of son, in 1748. All he can hope for now is seeing his precious daughter making a grand royal marriage before his time is up. Meanwhile his nephew married the "man-eater from Rotenburg" and accomplished what his uncle could not do: guarantee Hesse-Kassel with healthy baby boys.

As of 1745, the family is:​














Wilhelm VI (1629-1663), "the Just", Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, m. Hedwig Sophie of Brandenburg (1623-1683), by whom:
  • Charlotte Amalie (1650-1714), m. Christian V of Denmark, with issue,
  • William VII (1651-670), Landgraf 1663-1670,
  • Charles (1654-1730), Landgraf 1670-1730, m. Maria Amalia of Courland,
    • FREDERICK (1676 - , a. 73), "the Old", Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, a general, m. Tsarevna Natalya Petrovna (d. 1748 in childbirth),
      • Hedwig Maria Eudoxia of Hesse-Kassel (1730-, a. 19),
      • Multiple miscarriages and stillbirths.
    • Sophie Charlotte (1678-1749), m. Frederick William, Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (d. 1713), no issue.
    • William VIII (1682 -, a. 67), Imperial general, m. Dorothea Wilhelmina of Saxe-Dietz (1691-1743),
      • Frederick (1720- , a. 29), converted to Roman Catholicism, m. Eleonora Philippina of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg (1712-, a. 37), widowed 1733 and again 1738,
        • William Frederick (1740 - , a. 9),
        • Charles Frederick (1744-, a. 5),
        • Eleonora Frederica (1745-, a. 4),
        • Philippina Frederica(1747-, a. 2),
      • Maria Amalia (1721-1744), m. Charles, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach, without lasting issue.
    • Marie Louise (1688-1765),
    • Maximilian (1689 -, a. 60), Lord of Jesberg and Richerode, Imperial general, m. 1732 Henrietta Maria of Brandenburg-Schwedt (1702-, a. 47), a Dowager of Wurttemberg,
      • Henrietta Maria of Hesse-Kassel-Jesberg (1735 - , a. 14),
    • George Charles (1691 - , a. 58), Lord of Volkerhausen, Imperial general, m. Caroline of Nassau-Saarbrucken (1704-, a. 45), two miscarriages but no living children.
    • Wilhelmine Charlotte (1695-1722),
    • Others, died young.
  • Philipp (1655-1721), Landgrave of Hesse-Philippsthal, m. Katharina Amalia of Solms-Laubach,
    • Charles I (1682-, a. 63), Landgrave of Hesse-Philippsthal, m. Caroline Christine of Saxe-Eisenach,
      • William (1726-, a. 23),
      • Caroline (1728 -, a. 21),
      • Frederick (1729-, a. 20),
      • Charlotte Amalie (1730 -, a. 19),
      • Philippine Amalia (1731-, a. 18)
    • Philip (1686-1717), m. Maria von Limburg, and had issue,
    • William (1692-, a. 57), Landgrave of Hesse-Philippsthal-Barchfeld, m. and had issue.
  • Elisabeth Henriette (1661-1683), m. Frederick I of Prusia.
Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg (HU) & Pfalz-Sulzbach (Pfalz) & Rákóczi (A-H)
Ernest of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg (1623-1693), converted to Roman Catholicism, m. Maria Eleonore of Solms-Lich,
  • William I (1648-1725), "the Elder", Landgrave of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg, m. Maria Anna von Lowenstein-Wertheim,
    • Maria Eleonore (1675-), m. Theodor Eustach, Count Palatine of Sulzbach, with issue.
      • Amalia Augusta Maria Ana (1693-, a. 52),
      • Joseph Charles (1694-1729), Count Palatine of Sulzbach, m. Elisabeth Auguste Sophie of Pfalz-Neuburg (d. 1728),
        • Elisabeth Auguste (1721-, a. 28), m. Charles Theodore of Pfalz-Sulzbach,​
        • Maria Anna (1722-, a. 27), m. Clement Franz de Paula of Bavaria-Belgium,​
        • Maria Franziska (1724, a. 25), m. Frederick Michael of Pfalz-Zweibrucken,​
      • Francisca Christina (1696-, a. 53), Abbess of Essen,
      • Ernestine Elizabeth Johanna (1697-, a. 52), m. William II, Landgrave of Hesse-Rheinfels-Wanfried (d. 1731), below.
      • John Christian (1700-1733), m. Maria Henriette de la Tour d'Auvergne, m2. Eleonora Philippina of Rotenburg, below.
        • [1m] Charles Theodore (1724-, a. 25), Count Palatine of Sulzbach, m. Elisabeth Auguste of Pfalz-Sulzbach,
      • Anne Christine (1704-1723), m. Charles Emmanuel of Savoy.
    • Ernst II Leopold (1684-1749), Landgrave of Hesse-Rotenburg, m. Eleonore Maria Anna von Lowenstein-Wertheim.
      • Joseph (1705-1744) m. Christine of Salm-Neufville,
        • Anna Viktoria Maria Christina of Hesse-Rotenburg (1728 - , a. 21), m. Leopold of Hesse-Darmstadt,
      • Polyxena Christina Johannetta (1706-[1735?]), m. Charles de Bourbon, duc de Berry, with issue.
      • Alexander (1710-, a. 39), Landgrave of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg, a soldier, m. Maria Antonina Hedwige of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Wiesenborg (1721-, a. 28), a Roman Catholic Oldenburg,
        • Heinrich (1739 -, a. 10),
        • William (1740 - , a. 9),
        • Aloysius (1741 - , a. 8),
        • Anthony (1747-, a. 2),
      • Eleonora Philippina (1712-, a. 37), Countess Palatine, Princess and Landgravine, m1. Pfalzgraf Johann Christian zu Sulzbach (d. 1733), without issue. m2. Prince Joseph Rákóczi (d. 1738), m3. Landgrave Frederick of Hesse-Kassel, with issue by [2m] and [3m].
      • Caroline (1714-1741), m. Louis IV Henri de Condé (To Be Confirmed ITTL),
      • Constantine (1716 - a. 33 ), Landgrave of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg, unmarried,
      • Christine (1717-1778), m. Ludwig Viktor of Savoy-Carignano (1721), with issue.
  • Charles (1649-1711), m1. Sophie Magdalene of Salm-Reifferscheidt, m2. Alexandrine Juliane of Leiningen-Dagsburg, by whom:
    • [1m] Wilhelm (II) (1671-1731), the Younger, Landgrave of Hesse-Wanfried, m. Ernestine of Pfalz-Sulzbach (1697-), without issue.
    • [2m] Charlotte Amalie (1679-1722), m. Francis Rákóczi (1676-1735), King of Serbia,
      • Joseph Rákóczi (1700-1738), Hereditary Prince of Serbia, Marchese di San Carlo, a Hungarian nobleman, m. Eleonora Philippina of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg (1712-, a. 33), widowed 1733 and again 1738,
        • Leopold (Lipólt) Rákóczi (1734-, a. 15), Marchese di San Carlo,
      • George Rákóczi (1701-, a. 48), Marchese di Santa Elisabetta, unmarried,
      • Charlotte Rákóczi (1706-1738) m. Hereditary Prince of Baden-Durlach, with issue, m2. Leopold of Hesse-Darmstadt.
    • [2m] 5 other daughters, m. nobility of lesser note.
    • [2m] Christian (1689 - , a. 60), Landgrave of Hesse-Eschwege, m. Maria Eleonora Katharina of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Wiesenborg (1715-, a. 34), from a Roman Catholic branch of the Oldenburgs.
      • Katharina Polyxena of Hesse-Eschewege (1738-, a. 11),
      • Alexandrine Juliane of Hesse-Eschewege (1748 -, a. 1), weak but survived.
Hesse-Darmstadt (HU)
Ernest Louis (1667-1739), Landgrave of Hesse-Darmstadt, m. Dorothea Charlotte of Brandenburg-Ansbach, by whom:
  • Dorothea Sophie (1689-1723), m. Count John Frederick of Hohenlohe-Öhringen (1683–1765)
  • LOUIS VIII (1691 - , a. 58), Landgrave of Hesse-Darmstadt, m. Charlotte of Hanau-Lichtenberg (1700-1726), Countess of Lichtenberg,
    • Louis IX (1719-, a. 30), m. Hedwig of Nassau-Usingen (1714-, a. 35),
      • Louis Henry (1739-, a. 10),
      • George Leopold (1741-, a. 8),
      • Meinhard (1743-, a. 6), born mad (stark, raving mad),
      • Charles Leopold (1746 -, a. 3),
      • Dorothea Louise (1748-, a. 1),
      • William Ernest (1749-, a. 0),
    • George William (1722-, a. 27), his father's favourite, a Prussian soldier,
    • Caroline Louise (1723-, a. 26), learned and industrious, business-minded,
  • Charles William (1693-[1707?]), a soldier,
  • Francis Ernest (1695-[1716?]), a soldier,
  • Friederike Charlotte (1698 - , a. 47), m. Heinrich VII, Holy Roman Emperor, King of Bohemia and Duke of Bavaria, with issue.
Ernest's brother Philip of Hesse-Darmstadt (1671-1736), an Imperial Field Marshal, converted to Roman Catholicism in order to m. Princess Marie Ernestine of Croÿ (1673–1714), by whom:
  • Joseph (1699 - ), Prince-Bishop of Augsburg,​
  • Theodora (1706 - , a. 43), m. Francis Stephen, Duke of Julich-Kleve-Berg, with issue,​
  • Leopold (1708 - , a. 41), Imperial Field Marshal, m. Princess Charlotte Rákóczi (1706-d. in childbirth 1738), m2. Anna Viktoria Maria Christina of Hesse-Rotenburg (1728 - , a. 21),
    • Maria Christina Viktoria of Hesse-Darmstadt (1741-, a. 8).
Wittelsbach Belgium (Formerly Bavaria)
Dynastic Overview: King Karl Albrecht has a large family with various healthy heirs. The Netherlands have always recognized female succession so in addition to his two sons, his daughters are also relevant succession-wise. His children are all coming of age and it is now time they married into suitable Catholic royalty. By the 1740s it is likely one of Karl's clergyman brothers has replaced his uncle as Archbishop-Elector of Cologne.

As of 1749, the family is:

The Belgo-Bavarian branch of the House of Wittelsbach descends presently from Ferdinand Maria, Elector of Bavaria, who m. Henriette Adelaide of Savoy, and fathered:
  • Maria Anna Christine Victoria of Bavaria (1660-1690), m. Louis, le Grand Dauphin, later King Louis XV, and had issue in France.
  • Maximilian II Emmanuel (1662-1728) Elector and Duke of Bavaria, King of Bavaria (disputed), Governor of the Spanish Netherlands, m1. Maria Antonia of Austria, m2. Theresa Kunegunda Sobieska,
    • [1m] Joseph Ferdinand Leopold (1692-1699), the Spanish heir,
    • [2m] Maria Anna Karolina (1696- , a. 53), a nun,
    • [2m] KARL ALBRECHT (1697 -, a. 52), King of Belgium, m. Maria Amalia Josepha Anna of Austria (1700-, a. 49), sister of the Holy Roman Emperor Heinrich VII, of the Harmonious Union,
      • Maria Antonia Walpurgis Symphorosa (1724- , a. 25), m. Charles Emmanuel III of Savoy,​
      • Theresa Benedicta Maria (1725-[1743?]),​
      • Maximilian Joseph (1727 - , a. 22), "the Much-Beloved", betrothed to Maria Kunigunda of Austria-Bayern,​
      • Joseph Ludwig Leo (1728 - , a. 21), the spare,​
      • Maria Anna Josepha Augusta (1734 -, a. 15),​
      • Maria Clementina (1739 -, a. 10)​
    • [2m] Philipp Moritz Maria (1698 -[1719?]), Bishop of Paderborn and Munster,
    • [2m] Ferdinand Maria Innocenz Michael Joseph (1699-1738), Imperial General and General of the Artillery (Austria-Hungary), m. Maria Anna Carolina of Pfalz-Neuburg (1693-), niece of the Elector Palatine of the Rhine,
      • Maximilian Francis Joseph (1720-1738),
      • Clement Francis de Paula (1722 -, a.27), m. Maria Anna of Pfalz-Sulzbach,
        • Ferdinand Maria Maximilian Emmanuel (1744-, a. 5),
      • Theresa Emmanuel (1723 - , a. 26), m. Christian IV of Pfalz-Zweibrucken,
      • [Illeg.] Joseph Ferdinand (1718 - , a. 31), a soldier,
    • [2m] Clemens August (1700 - , a. 49), Grand Master of the Teutonic Order, Prince-Archbishop of Cologne, Bishop of Regensburg, Paderborn, Osnabruck, Hidelsheim and Munster,
    • [2m] Cardinal Johann Theodor (1703 -, a. 46), Prince-Bishop of Regensburg, Freising and Liége, [Elector and Archbishop of Cologne?],
    • [Illeg.] Emmanuel François Joseph (1695 -, a. 54), Count of Bavaria.
  • Joseph Clemens (1671-[1723?]), Elector and Archbishop of Cologne, survived into the 1730s ITTL.
  • Violante Beatrix (1673-d.), m. Ferdinando de' Medici, and had issue, in Tuscany.
Savoy-Piemonte
Dynastic Overview: Amidst a lot of turbulence and upheaval, Victor Amadeus II was succeeded by his eldest son, Victor Amadeus III. He married Emperor Heinrich's sister and had five children with her. He briefly abdicated in favour of his son and heir under allegations of incapacity, before being restored at bayonet point. With his son's premature death, Victor Amadeus passed and was suceeded by his wilely brother Carlo Emmanuel.

Carlo Emmanuele has been married twice and fathered a large brood of children who died young, stillborn or miscarried. Recently widowed for a second time, he is left with two young daughters. This unhappy family life only makes him more restless and ambitious.

The runaway half-brother, Vittorio Francesco, established himself in permanent exile in Naples and entered Spanish service, marrying a couin of Don Carlos III and becoming a Grandee-Duke.

As of 1749, the family is:

Victor Amadeus II (1666-1732), born Vittorio Amedeo Francesco, duke of Savoy, prince of Piedmont, marquis of Saluzzo and count of Aosta, Maurienne and Nice, King of Savoy (disputed), Grand Duke of Savoy (disputed), Imperial Vicar of Italy (renounced, disputed), went mad, m. Anne Marie d'Orléans (irregular divorce by Bishop of Saluzzo 1723), m2. (bigamously) Anna Canalis di Cumiana, his mistress, who later fled Savoy with her step-son V. Francesco.
  • [1m] Maria Adelaide (1685-[1712?]), m. Louis, Duke of Burgundy, later Louis XVI of France, with issue.
  • [1m] Maria Luisa Gabriella (1688-1714), m. Philippe, Duc d'Anjou, later Duke of Parma.
  • [1m] VICTOR AMADEUS III (1699-1746), Duke of Savoy, King of the Piemontese 1744, abdicated, later restored as Duke at bayonet point, m. Archduchess Maria Josepha of Austria (1699-), sister of the Holy Roman Emperor Heinrich,
    • Charles Emmanuel (1716 -1746), briefly replaced his father c. 1725, b. Maria Maximiliana of Austria, sans issue,
    • Maria Vittoria (1723 - , a. 26), m. the Tsesarevich of Russia,
    • Maria Felicitá (1727-, a. 22),
    • Maria Pietá (1729 -, a. 20)
    • Maria Leopoldina (1732 -, a. 17), weak, but survived.
  • [1m] Charles Emmanuel III (1701 -, a. 48), Duke of Aosta, m. Anna Christine of Pfalz-Sulzbach (d. 1723), m2. Augusta Maria Johanna of Baden-Baden (1704-1740), daughter of the famous general Turkenlouis, m3. Maria Walburga of Belgium,
    • [1m] Vittorio Amedeo Teodor (1723-1725),
    • [2m] Stillborn daughter (1726),
    • [2m] Miscarried son (1727),
    • [2m] Miscarried son (1730),
    • [2m] Stillborn daughter (1731),
    • [2m] Stillborn daughter (1733),
    • [2m] Vittoria Augusta (1736 -, a. 13), weak, but survives,
    • [2m] Charlotte Emmanuel (1739 -, a. 10), of perfect health.
  • [Illeg.] Maria Vittoria Francesca (1690 -, a. 59), legitimized 1703, m. Victor Amadeus I, Prince of Carignano, agnate,​
    • Anna Theresa of Savoy (1717 -, a. 32), m. Louis-Charles de Bourbon, duc de Touraine, son of Louis XVI,​
    • Louis Victor of Savoy (1721 -, a. 28), Heir Presumptive of Savoy, m. Christine of Hesse-Rheinfels-Rotenburg (1717-1778), with issue,
  • [Illeg.] Don Vittorio Francesco (1694 -, a. 55), legitimized 1703, declared heir 1723, Marquis of Susa, fled abroad 1723. Duke of San Martín 1726, m. Sophia of Pfalz-Gelnhausen, a cousin of Don Carlos III, by whom:​
    • Don Carlos Manoel (1728 - , a. 21),
    • Don Juan Victor Gabriel (1730 - , a. 19), deaf,
    • Doña Sofia Victoria (1735 - , a. 14).
Este of Modena & Gonzaga of Guastalla
Cardinal Rinaldo d'Este famously left the Roman Catholic when he became Duke Rinaldo III of Modena and Reggio. He had married a sister of the Holy Roman Empress Wilhelmina and reaped the rewards of this pro-Hapsburg policy when his daughter Enrichetta married Don Carlos III of Spain. He lived to see her be crowned Queen of Italy and guarantee the Spanish succession producing three healthy half-Este infantes.

By a 1724 Pact with Duke Rinaldo, Don Carlos assumed responsibility for finding good marriages for the other Este children. Efforts were dampened by the death in quick succession of two prospective bride grooms, King Karl III of Hungary and Filippo Gonzaga of Novellara. In 1725, the sisters were married off to Spanish allies in northern Italy: Benedetta to Antonio Ferrante Gonzaga, Duke of Guastalla, and Amalia to Francesco Maria Pico della Mirandola, Duke of Mirandola. A few years later, when Duke Antonio died childless, Don Carlos ensured Benedetta's remarriage to his heir and successor, Duke Giuseppe Maria. Alas, both sisters would later die in childbirth.

Finding wives for the Este brothers was more difficult. Relations were temporarily strained by rumours Modena would marry its crown prince in France, especially, to the recently widowed princesse du sang, Charlotte Agláe d'Orléans. Her proven fertility, royal birth and connections to Russia, Poland-Lithuania and Tuscany made her an attractive possibility. The prospect of abandoning her newborn son in Copenhagen probably made the reverse not true. French refusal and a substantial dowry from Spain accordingly guaranteed the marriage of both Este sons with cousins of Don Carlos.

Francesco d'Este married his duchessa Carolina, born Countess Palatine Caroline Christiane von Pfalz-Zweibrucken, and fathered seven children by her. Regrettably, two of their sons were intellectually disabled from birth, with one of them being physically stunted too. In the decade between his marriage and his ascension as Duke of Modena and Reggio in 1737, Francesco held various lucrative postings in the Spanish army and administration,

His brother, Gian Federico, married another cousin - the Countess Palatine Charlotte Katharina of Pfalz-Gelnhausen - and was made Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo and a Grandee of Spain 1st Class. Like his brother, he thereafter enjoyed his pickings of choice promotions and job postings in the armies and administration of Spain.


As of 1749, the family is:




Duke Rinaldo III d'Este (1655-1737), m. Charlotte Felicitas of Brunswick-Luneburg (1671-1710), sister of the Holy Roman Empress Wilhelmina, and was father to:
  • Benedetta Maria Ernesta d'Este (1697-1741), m1. Antonio Ferrante Gonzaga (1687-1729), Duke of Guastalla and Sabionetta, prince of Bozzolo and Pomponesco, without issue; m2. Giuseppe Maria Gonzaga (1690-1746), Duke of Guastalla and Sabionetta, brother of preceding, mentally incapable,​
    • CARLO MARIA GONZAGA (1731 -, a. 18), named for his uncle and godfather Don Carlos, Duke of Guastalla and Sabionetta,
    • Vicenzo Maria Gonzaga (1732 -, a. 17),
    • A daughter (1741), mother and daughter both died in childbirth.
  • FRANCESCO MARIA D'ESTE (1698 - , a. 51), Duke of Modena and Reggio, m. Countess Palatine Caroline Christiane of Pfalz-Zweibrucken (1706-, a. 43),
    • Francesco Cristiano (1731-, a. 18),
    • Ercole (1733-, a. 16),
    • Benedetto (1734-, a. 15), mentally incapable,
    • Afonso Maria (1736-, a. 13), mentally and physically stunted,
    • Ippolita Maria (1736-, a. 13), the twin of perfect health,
    • Carolina Cristina (1737-, a. 12),
    • Carlo Alfonso (1739-, a. 10),
  • Amalia Giuseppina d'Este (1699-1743), m. Francesco Maria II Pico della Mirandola (1688-1747), Duke of Mirandola and Marquis of Concordia,​
    • Alessandro (III) Pico della Mirandola (1727-, a. 20), Duke of Mirandola and Marquis of Concordia,​
    • Gian Carlo (1732-, a. 17),​
    • Stillborn daughter (1741),​
    • Stillborn son (1743),​
  • Gian Federico d'Este (1700-, a. 49), Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo, Grandee of Spain 1st Class, m. Countess Palatine Charlotte Katharina of Pfalz-Gelnhausen (1699 -, a. 50), cousin of Don Carlos III,​
    • Maria Luisa Gabriella (1732-, a. 17), heiress of the Duchy-Grandeeship of Ciudad Rodrigo.
  • Enrichetta Maria d'Este (1702 - ), m. Don Carlos III/VI, with issue,​
  • [Illeg.] Rinaldo di Reggio, Chevalier de Reggio, m. Felicité de Canapan,
    • Francesco Maria de Reggio (1698 - ), Chevalier de Reggio.​
Gonzaga of Mantua
The Peace of Milan 1710 recognized the legitimization of Giovanna Gonzaga and his right to succeed his father, Duke Ferdinando Carlo, as Duke of Mantua and Montferrat. French backing was ratified by the legitimé's marriage to Marie Anne de Bourbon-Condé. Their eldest son, Giulio Deodato, was some years in the making and was thus hailed as the 'God-Given', for preventing a Third War of the Mantuan Succession. In 1735, Giulio married his mother's cousin, Louise Diane d'Orléans, rejecting rival brides offered by the Spanish.

As of 1749, the family is:

Giovanni Gonzaga (1671-1743), Duke of Mantua and Montferrat, a bastard legitimized by Imperial decree 1704, briefly a clergyman as Abbot of Santa Barbara 1700, m. 1704 Marie Anne de Bourbon-Condé (1678-?), Mademoiselle de Montmorency,
  • Stillborn daughter (1707),
  • GIULIO DEODATO GONZAGA (1715-, a. 34), "the God-Given", Duke of Mantua and Montferrat, hoped-for male heir, named for his grandfather Henri Jules de Condé, m. Louise Diane d'Orléans (1716-, a. 33),
    • Francesca Maria (1736-, a. 13),
    • Luisa Elisabetta (1737-, a. 12),
    • Chiara Clementina (1738-, a. 11),
    • Filippo Giulio (1739-, a. 10),
    • Innocenzo Deodato (1741, - a. 8),
  • Filippo (1720-, .a. 29),
  • Innocenzo (1722-, a. 27)
His siblings, all of them illegitimate:
  • Giovanna (d. 1739), m. Count Jacopo Bardoxi,
  • Clara (1686-), a Capuchin nun,
  • Maria Elisabetta (1696-), a Capuchin nun,
  • Carlo (1692-), a canon of San Pietro in the Vatican,
  • Isabella (1694-), a Servite nun.
De Baviéra (Spanish Wittelsbachs)
The de Baviéra family are a Spanish branch of the Wittelsbachs. A minor branch of that famous family, their career prospects were hampered by the vulnerability of their fiefs on the Alsation border region disputed by France and the Holy Roman Empire. Things improved dramatically with the marriage of Louise of Pfalz-Zweibrucken-Birkenfeld and Don Carlos II in 1701. That lady's long political career as Queen Dowager of Spain meant court placements and profitable career opportunities in Spain, Italy and the Spanish Netherlands for her relatives, especially those willing to convert as she had.

Wars involving Alace in 1702-1703, 1723 and 1731 negatively impacted the family's properties in the departéments of Bas-Rhin (county of Bischweiler) and Haut-Rhin (county of Rappolstein - Ribbeauvillé) and the nearby Rhineland Palatine (county of Birkenfeld). The inheritance in 1731 of further lands in the Rhineland (Duchy of Zweibrucken) and Bas-Rhin (County Palatine of Kleeburg) improved their standing and incomes, but service in Madrid and Milan remained the most profitable option for the bulk of the family.

As of 1749, the family is:

Christian I of Pfalz-Birkenfeld-Bischweiler (1598-1654), Pfalzgraf von Bischweiler, m. Magdalena Katharina of Pfalz-Zweibrucken (1607-1648),
  • Dorothea Katharina (1634-1715), m. Graf Johann Ludwig von Nassau-Ottweiler, with issue.
  • Christian II (1637-1717), Herzog und Pfalzgraf von Birkenfeld, a general for the French and landowner in Alsace and Rhineland, later served his grandson Don Carlos II, m. Grafin Katharina Agathe von Rappolstein (1648-1683),
    • Magdalena Claudia (1668-1704), m. Graf Philipp Reinhard von Hanau-Munzenberg, line extinct.
    • Christian III (1674-1735), Herzog und Pfalzgraf von Zweibrucken, m. Eleonora Luisa Gonzaga of Guastalla (1686-),
      • Caroline Christiane (1706-, a. 43), m. 1724 Duke Francesco of Modena, with issue.
      • Christian IV (1708 - , a. 41), m. Theresa Emmanuel of Bavaria-Belgium (1723-, a. 26),
        • Christian (V) Karl (1745-, a. 4),
      • Frederick Michael (1711 - , a. 38), m. Maria Franziska of Pfalz-Sulzbach (1724, a. 25),
        • Karl August Christian (1747-, a. 2), destined to be mad,
        • Joseph Maria Emmanuel (1748-, a. 1),
      • Henriette Christine (1715 - , a. 34), m. Wilhelm of Pfalz-Zweibrucken-Gelnhausen, Governor of Milan etc.
    • Maria Luisa (1678 - ), Queen Dowager of Spain, m. Don Carlos II of Spain, mother of Don Carlos III.
    • [Illeg.] Don Luís de Baviéra (1693-), born Baron Ludwig von Stein, legitimized 1726, Duke-Marqués de Dos Puentes, Grand Regent of Hungary, m. Archduchess Maria Magdalena of Austria (deceased),
      • Doña Maria Magdalena (1726-, a. 23),
      • Doña Maria Catalina (1727-, a. 22),
      • A stillborn daughter (1730).
  • Johann Karl (1638-1704), Herzog und Pfalzgraf von Gelnhausen, m1. Sophia Amalia von Zweibrucken, m2. Esther Maria von Witzleben (1665-1725), who moved with her children to Spain. Second marriage originally morganatic, later declared dynastic.
    • [1m] Magdalena Juliana (1686-1720), m. Duke Joachim Frederick of Schleswig-Holstein-Plon, with issue.
    • [2m] Don Fadrique Bernardo (1697 - , a. 52), born Friedrich Bernhard, a country gentleman of the HU, Spanish envoy in Nuremberg,
    • [2m] Don Juan (1698 - , a. 51), born Johann, Viceroy of Valencia 1740, a bachelor,
    • [2m] Charlotte Katharina (1699 - , a. 50), m. Gian Federico d'Este, Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo, with issue.
    • [2m] Don Guillermo (1701 - , a. 48), born Wilhelm, Governor-General of Milan, m. Henriette Christine of Pfalz-Zweibrucken (1715 - , a. 34)
      • Doña Carlotta Maria Cristina (1746-, a. 3),
      • Stillborn daughter (1749),
    • [2m] Sophia Maria (1702 - , a. 47), m. Vittorio Francesco of Savoy, Marquis of Susa, with issue.
  • Anna Magdalena (1640-1693), m. Graf Johann Reinhard II von Hanau-Lichtenberg, with issue.
Portugal
Dom Pedro II (1648-1706), King of Portugal, m. Maria Sophia of Pfalz-Neuburg (1666-1699), by whom:
  • Dom João V (1689 -, a. 60), King of Portugal, born João Francisco António José Bento Bernardo, m. Archduchess Maria Anna of Austria (1683-, a.66),​
    • Dona Maria Bárbara (1711-, a. 38), born Maria Madalena Bárbara Xavier Leonor Teresa Antónia Josefa,
    • Dom José (1714-, a. 35), born José Francisco António Inácio Norberto Agostinho, m. 1731 Philippine Élisabeth Charlotte d'Orléans (1715-, a. 34),
      • Dona Maria Francisca (1732 - , a. 17), born Maria Francisca Isabel Josefa Antónia Gertrudes Rita Joana de Bragança, b. Cosimo Ottaviano de' Medici, Prince of Tuscany,
      • Dom Pedro (1736 -, a. 13), born Pedro de Alcântara Francisco António João Carlos Xavier de Paula Miguel Rafael de Bragança, b. Maria Maximilian of Austria, Infanta of Spain,
      • Dona Maria Ana (1739 -, a. 10), born Maria Ana Francisca Josefa Rita Joana,
      • Dom João José (1741 -, a. 7),
      • Dona Maria Doroteia (1742 -, a. 7), born Maria Francisca Doroteia Josefa Antónia Gertrudes Rita Joana Efigénia,
      • Dom Francisco Xavier (1745-, a. 4),
    • Dom Carlos (1716-1736), born Carlos João Manuel Alexandre de Bragança, sickly.
    • Dom Pedro (1717-, a. 42), Grand Prior of Castro, Lord of the Infantado,
    • [Illeg.] Dom António (1704-, a. 45), raised for religion,
    • [Illeg.] Dom Gaspar (1716-, a. 33), raised for religion,
    • [Illeg.] Dom José (1720-, a. 29), raised for religion.
  • Dom Francisco (1691 - 1742), Duke of Beja, Grand Prior of Crato, Lord of the Infantado, born Francisco Xavier José António Bento Urbano,
    • [Illeg.] Dom João da Bemposta (1725-, a. 24), a navy man and courtier,​
  • Dom António (1695 -, a. 50), born António Francisco Xavier Benedito Teodósio Leopoldo Henrique,
  • Dom Manuel (1697 -, a. 48), Count of Ourém, born Manuel José Francisco António Caetano Estêvão Bartolomeu, an adventurer,​
  • Dom Francisca Josefa Maria Xaviera (1699-[1736?], a. 50)​
  • [Illeg.] Dona Luísa de Braganza (1679-1732), m1. Luís Ambrósio de Melo, Duke of Cadaval, m2. Jaime Álvares Pereira de Melo, Duke of Cadaval.​
  • [Illeg.] Dom Miguel de Braganza (1699-1724) m. Dona Luísa Casimira de Sousa Nassau e Ligne, Duchess of Lafões, Countess of Miranda do Corvo, Lady of Sousa, with issue.​
  • [Illeg.] Dom José Carlos de Braganza (1703-, a. 46), Archbishop of Braga.​
 
Last edited:
Back
Top