[X] The rites of nature: The high gods of the water and the heavens were not the only divinities which mattered in Eskeragal rites. All of nature was alive and full of animating essences, from animals to trees, fields and forests, rivers and mountains. Nature was not some passive recipient for human will, but full of agency and power, and to placate and work with these forces was necessary for Eskeragal to thrive and prosper. Small ad hoc shrines with uneducated priesthoods could handle the rites of a single river, and tradition preserved the names of these forces for far longer than text had ever done.
 
[X] ...Declared for the palace
-[X] ...Break the siege
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe
 
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe
[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
 
Last edited:
[X] ...Declared for the palace
-[X] ...Break the siege
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe

what is like
historical example of the cult of the axe?
 
what is like
historical example of the cult of the axe?


*BATTLE AXE CULTURE INTENSIFIES"

Article:
The shaft-hole axes
The shaft-hole axes were made using various stones, although not flint, and were more likely to be status weapons or ceremonial objects. Examples of these include the boat axes used in the Battle Axe cultures of Europe in around 3200–1800 BC (read more about the Battle Axe culture below).

The polygonal axe is a kind of battle axe that belongs to the Late Stone Age and dates to around 3000–3400 BC. It is usually made from greenstone or some other exclusive stone, and is fitted with a shaft hole. It also tends to have various special features, such as a flared edge, an arched butt, an angled body, grooves and ridges. The features are hammered out and then polished across the whole surface. The polygonal axe is seen as a copy of the Central European copper axes, but even in these areas, polygonal axes of various kinds have been found.

The double-headed battle axe is a shaft-hole axe from around 3400–2900 BC. It occurred mainly around Rügen in Germany and on Zealand in Denmark, as the Battle Axe culture established itself in the surrounding areas. The axe has a flared edge that became very prominent among the later types, which also gained a flared butt. The double-edged axes were always made from hard and homogeneous stones such as porphyry, and they were also finely polished.

The boat axe is an old name for the shaft-hole axe of the Swedish-Norwegian Battle Axe culture that is now simply referred to as the battle axe. In recent years, the purpose of the battle axe as a weapon has been called into question, not least because the shaft hole is sometimes so small that it could not be attached to a sufficiently strong handle. It may then have served a ceremonial purpose and as an identity marker for the upper echelons of society. Similar axes appeared across a large swathe of North-Eastern Europe, although there are clear differences in the details between different cultural areas.

The Battle Axe culture (c. 3200–1800 BC)
The Battle Axe culture (c. 3200–1800 BC), also referred to as the Boat Axe culture in older literature, is a relatively uniform archaeological culture that occurs in an area of Southern Sweden-Norway that stretches from Bornholm and Skåne in the south up to Uppland in the north and along the Norwegian coast up to Central Norway. It is a regional variant of the Corded Ware culture that occurred in North-Eastern Europe during the third century BC. In addition to the battle axes that gave the culture its name and the typical ceramic pots, there are a number of other objects that are characteristic of the culture. These include flint adzes and chisels, which are commonly hollow-edged.
 
The boat axe is an old name for the shaft-hole axe of the Swedish-Norwegian Battle Axe culture that is now simply referred to as the battle axe. In recent years, the purpose of the battle axe as a weapon has been called into question, not least because the shaft hole is sometimes so small that it could not be attached to a sufficiently strong handle. It may then have served a ceremonial purpose and as an identity marker for the upper echelons of society. Similar axes appeared across a large swathe of North-Eastern Europe, although there are clear differences in the details between different cultural areas.

> boat axe
hahahahaha
even in this vote, we can vote for boats
 
[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe
 
Last edited:
I want people to remember that when the vote talks about "crushing" inequality, this is a premodern system of doing that and still allows both the onenamekene, chieftaincy and priesthood to exist. It is much more about defending tradition than some modern notion of equality. In classical Eskerag society the classes are warrior-aristocracy, farmers and priesthood. It is not about making the farmers equal to the warrior-aristocracy and priesthood, it is about making equality within the farmer class in order to preserve a sense of cultural homogeneity.

what is like
historical example of the cult of the axe?
Minoan Crete and Bronze Age Denmark both seem to have had some form of axe-cult. The example of a clay vessel for sacrifice standing before a hole containing the axe is literally stolen almost word for word from Denmark.
 
On second thought, further increasing trade is the way to go. Merchant Republic, ho!

[X] ...Trade could not be refused

[X] The rites of nature

[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
 
Last edited:
My read on the options here:

[ ] The appeasement of ancestors: Ancestors served an important role in Eskerag belief and worship. They would guard families, they would bless devoted daughters and good sons and curse an enemy. And unlike the high gods, they could be expected to listen to a family's pleas and concern themselves with the desperate cries of a bloodline fallen on hard times. Small sacrifices at house-altars were common and even chieftains and onenamekene would make elaborate references to their proud ancestors and give the praise for letting them accomplish great deeds and defeat worthy foes.

Ancestor worship is pretty straightforward. Encourages people to maintain their own rites and histories, which probably translates to somewhat higher literacy rates just to manage. Of course, with such things, the length and repute of your family history becomes more significant than present competence.

[ ] The cult of the axe: For those who could afford it, the axe was a vital tool. It could log trees and it could separate limb from limb. It was sharp and heavy, light and powerful. The power and force of the axe were necessary for the existence of some communities, whether they were warriors or they were farmers. Therefore, it was not uncommon to find such an axe placed in a pit in the floor of some houses, with a clay vessel before it in which to receive offerings. The veneration of the axe was not bound to any strata of society; from the simple axes of lower warriors to the richly dedicated axes that hung in the palatial corridors, it was a universal icon.

Martial cult? Not sure, never read much on this topic.

[ ] The rites of nature: The high gods of the water and the heavens were not the only divinities which mattered in Eskeragal rites. All of nature was alive and full of animating essences, from animals to trees, fields and forests, rivers and mountains. Nature was not some passive recipient for human will, but full of agency and power, and to placate and work with these forces was necessary for Eskeragal to thrive and prosper. Small ad hoc shrines with uneducated priesthoods could handle the rites of a single river, and tradition preserved the names of these forces for far longer than text had ever done.

This spreads out the priesthood from great urban temples and makes sure that smaller places have priests to consult on spoopy things, helps keep the culture from erosion somewhat. Counterbalance is it's probably a nice cauldron of superstition from local practices perpetuated by priests who really don't know any different.
 
[X] ...Trade could not be refused

Plan Trade Republic continues apace.

[X] The cult of the axe

I just think its cool, so why not?

Okay, now for the really tricky one: Hoxma.

See, while the rewards for supporting the palace are likely bigger, the issue is that at this stage we are mostly about establishing certain norms and patterns. So what supporting the palace does is lending support for legitimacy stemming not from pure force of arms... the trouble is going to be that the subsequent reign of the child king is almost certainly going to be a complete shitshow. Regencies always bring trouble, and the kid is going to be a puppet for the palace staff and is very likely to turn out to be a sociopath from having too much power at too young an age. Now admittedly we can probably get in on that action by securing a royal marriage very favourable to us if we help out, but its probably going to set the stage for a century of political drama and imperial collapse.

Conversely, while the general is more likely to be an actually good ruler, he's also going to establish the idea that he who holds the military is king, which is a recipe for a civil war at the end of every king's life.

Now, either of these options are pretty bad, if not 100% guaranteed to come about. So, the question is, what should we do about it?

[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river


Let's go with the option set that lets us play indirect kingmaker and further cements our naval legacies.
 
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured

[X] The cult of the axe

[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
 
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe
[X] ...Declared for the palace
- [X] ...Assist the defense
 
[X] ...Declared for the palace
-[X] ...Break the siege
[X] ...Inequality must be quashed
[X] The cult of the axe
 
[X] ...Declared for the palace
-[X] ...Break the siege
[X] ...Trade could not be refused
[X] The cult of the axe
 
[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river


1) Three year old king is no good. Either he gets puppeted by the cloistered ministers with tons of intrigue and instability or he gets spoiled into become a power mad despot.
2) Boats. Always and ever boats.

[X] ...Trade could not be refused

Soon we will become rich enough to just buy the Hoxman wholesale if they make more trouble.

[X] The cult of the axe

This seems cool and works with boats.
 
[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
[X] ...Trade could not be refused
[X] The cult of the axe
 
[X] ...Declared for the army
-[X] Block the river
[X] ...The priesthood must be secured
[X] The cult of the axe
 
Back
Top