arthurh3535 said:
The Geth allowed themselves to get mind-whammied by the Reapers twice to become enemy mooks. Who's to say they won't pick a third time to save themselves by their 'logic'? Sorry, if I had to pick between the Geth and Quarians, I picked the Quarians.
They are just idiots.
But consider, the Geth only partially turned once to the Reapers (and that was only a small percentage), then turned the second time
only because the Quarians were attacking them without asking to negotiate. Because of game balance, the Geth didn't roflstomp the Quarians with sheer numbers, so they turned to the Reapers purely as a last-resort for self-preservation, which if you recall, is why they drove the Quarians off of Rannoch in the first place.
Honestly, my first choice would have been to be prepared via having numerous other Geth worlds set up, with full manufacturing capacity, or at least a 'flee' option for the Geth, but it comes down to a choice.
If your mother and father advanced on you with weapons, quite intent on killing you, and would not listen to pleads for understanding, what would you do?
I would flee, not for fear of my life, but for fear of theirs.
If retreat was not an option, I would fight my parents, with full intent to kill if necessary.
I would not do so lightly, I would most likely be haunted for a long time, but if it came down to life or death, regardless of who it was, I would choose life, no matter the cost. I may be in the bizarrely logical, batshit-insane minority for that view, but I would.
Mind you, I would not choose life when fighting the Reapers. A suicidal charge would be better than a life as a husk. I'd go out with a firebomb, with a detonating ship, or with a nuke, so as to deprive the Reapes of biomass.
But if I was the Geth, facing the Quarians... I'd fight until I died, without the Reaper's help. I'd do what Legion suggests with plenty of attempt to communicate, but when it comes down to it, I'd
fight and
die against the Quarians willingly. If the idiotic bigots want to continue to the path of self-destruction, it will take a goddamn miracle to dissuade them.
I'd choose the naive but wise Geth over the Quarians any day, because you can teach the Geth like you could a race of children. The Quarians, 0n the other hand, have three hundred years of conditioning to hate the Geth. Imagine if Hitler (hello, Godwin) had three hundred years for his followers to pass on his ideology, and to weed out the smart people who don't agree (for the record, I am aware that most of the German army was fighting for country, not for Party) and given
three hundred years to distill that belief, it would be
very hard to convince the Quarians not to go completely genocidal to the Geth. IMO, the only reason Tali didn't take her shotgun to EDI was because she trusted Shepard with every fiber of her being.
Mizuki_Stone said:
More over this could be a case of 'just crazy enough to work'.
Because let's be honest here... outside of plot hax that may or may not come into play, it's not like he's swimming for options. The Geth are about the one faction in the entire setting that might be able to pull a zerg rush on the reapers, and no one can pull a tech advantage on them.
Obviously the Von Neumann Machine plays quite heavily into my decision to gain the help of the Geth, but it's not my primary reason.
Consider: I have large amounts of blackmail on the Council, as well as connections to Aria. On the other hand, we have the Geth.
Which one, do you think, will believe me? And if they believe me, which one would be willing to put almost all of their resources into my hands?
Organics are lovely, I enjoy them quite a bit. But sometimes, you need the simple logic of a machine (not always, 'cause, hello Skynet, HAL, Glados, SHODAN, the Heretics, and numerous others).
Also, if I were to distill my raw
essence into one saying, it would be Mizuki's second quote in his sig.
As I said before, the popular definition of sanity is
not sanity. It is madness, organized by group perception.
If by using my brain, I am insane, then so be it. I will make whatever tough decisions I must, though I may mourn them later.
I'd rather live to mourn my decisions (as long as I still have sentience and free will) than die without anything to mourn.