I like how you censored the word "clusterf---'
Oh, God, please don't tell me that ADM. King got promoted from CNO to SecNav! The man was more or less competent, I'll grant, but his naked hatred for the British (amongst others) led to some absolutely horrific mistakes when the USN got into the war in @.
With the caveat that Churchill's likely to be either ousted or coup'd sooner or later; at the very least Anglo-Soviet relations might improve due to shared rage at America
I can't see America giving a woman a cabinet position in 1940.
Nevermind, I had forgotten about thatIt already happened - Francis Perkins was Secretary of Labor for the entire Roosevelt administration OTL, and for both terms ITL.
Interesting chapter and the eastern front has kicked off but there is a puzzling line in here.
Stalin isn't seriously giving up after losing Minsk right?I know the initial German advance into Russia seemed to go well for Germany but I find it hard to believe that Stalin would throw in the towel after that considering he still fought on when Germany was at the fringes of Moscow, or is there some detail that I don't know about?
That's an actual quote, actually. Or at least it's said to be. He said it before his breakdown at the start of the invasion.I will concur that I don't think Stalin would give up this quickly, but I could maybe see him shouting this in a pique of anger. I'm sure if anyone moved to publicize it or use it against him he'd sic Beria on them, but he could absolutely be throwing a fit over seemingly everything going wrong.
A fully isolationist America would certainly lead to Japan going north instead of south
Even if they don't go north immediately, a declaration of neutrality or an agreement creates strategic ambiguity. Enough ambiguity, say, that the Red Army doesn't feel like it can move its troops in the east...If Japan goes ahead with occupying the Dutch East Indies (which would still be under martial law after the Netherlands proper got occupied by the Nazis), and/or manages to bring Thailand into it's sphere of influence, the UK might try to stop them from snowballing out of control. Similarly, even if Japan holds from taking the Philippines and so forth, they might still go after British possessions in East Asia to cut off supply lines to KMT China.
Oh ho ho, thank you very much for that suggestion! I'll be sure to let Admiral King know who to thank for his promotion. (Although I will have to work out a way to get him in the post - maybe they could claim it as an 'emergency temporary appointment?')Oh, God, please don't tell me that ADM. King got promoted from CNO to SecNav! The man was more or less competent, I'll grant, but his naked hatred for the British (amongst others) led to some absolutely horrific mistakes when the USN got into the war in @.
[checks Wiki]
OK, SecNav has to have been out of uniform for at least five years before assuming the post, so King is legally disqualified. (Assuming Trump actually follows the law, which is hardly a safe assumption these days.)
...
Maybe it's an up-timer? Maybe even someone who actually remembers the Charlie-Foxtrot that was the Mk.14 torpedo family and is undertaking additional testing to make sure it's war-ready? And is leveraging other uptime knowledge to try to get out ahead of the worst crises?
...
Oh, who am I trying to kid. Any naval war in this timeline involving the USN is going to be just as much of a shitshow as the 1941-1943 period was IOTL. Probably worse, since Trump thinks with his petulant spite and doesn't even know the basics of Pearl Harbour!
Funny you should mention a coup...With the caveat that Churchill's likely to be either ousted or coup'd sooner or later; at the very least Anglo-Soviet relations might improve due to shared rage at America
Herbert Hoover or J. Edgar hoover?Thank fuck for Hoover's paranoia and arrogance.
It felt unclean typing that.
J Edgar, probably, as he's the notoriously powerful and paranoid founder of the FBI who blackmailed every president from Truman to Nixon. Presumably, while he's entrenched himself here, Hoover hasn't yet reached the heights of power he'd reach during the Cold War OTL, and Trump's brainworms about "woke DEI FBI" would keep him empowering the FBI like Roosevelt did. One the one hand, that's good, because that means the CPUSA and civil rights movement and so forth won't be crippled by COINTELPRO- Hoover was first and foremost an anti-communist, after all. On the other, the United States is absolutely going to become a playground for the Abwehr and Kempeitai.
Assuming Trump's life goes similarly to OTL with a few adjustments (such as The Apprentice being a radio show), the answer is probably yes.Question
In this timeline. Does the Art of the Deal still exist
Even with the era it's in, it occurs that Trump can only ride ride the warhorse of white racial grievances so far before his domestic/economic policies run into issues.
It terrifies me that Stalin, Churchill and Hoover are the only sane people in the equation.
You say that, but who knows what Hoover's angle is here?Thank fuck for Hoover's paranoia and arrogance.
It felt unclean typing that.
Vis-a-vis the Soviets, I do agree that it's impossible for the Axis to reach the A-A line, but I do wonder if they might be able to grind the Soviets into a peace deal on somewhat favorable terms. I admit I'm not a huge expert on the Soviet war effort, and it would a future thing, of course, and this TL, for now, is focused around 1941, and the war in the east absolutely won't be over by the end of the year. I don't think that's too much of a spoiler.Nazi Germany absolutely wouldn't be able to win, but we can say that with the benefit of hindsight. It's impossible for the Soviets to surrender, but the UK just might. God knows what sort of peace terms the Axis would try to extract, though.
Thank you very much! I've been having a lot of fun (well, dark fun) putting all of this together. I love reading primary sources, so I wanted to give the vibe of something that's a collection of those.I don't know enough about World War II in the specifics to comment on history, what the butterflies of this timeline would be, and so forth, but:
@E350 I love the way you're presenting this story, using 'in-universe' documents. It creates this vibe of a documentary or a historian picking through (the rubble of?) civilisation and piecing things together. It's historiography which I remember really findig fascinating back when I studied history at school, so I figured it was worth calling out: even aside from the actual history side, you've done a marvellous job of making something which is just engaging to read and follow along with.
In some form, yes, and it is still probably ghostwritten.Question
In this timeline. Does the Art of the Deal still exist
The US is still rearming, although not as well. Trump's sort of piggy backing off existing Roosevelt admin trajectory, and between him, Vance and Hegseth there's enough of a military fetish for that to still happen. However, it's not going at anywhere near the same pace, and they are missing things Britain would have given them (no Rolls-Royce engines for the Mustang, for example), and it's all subject to the Trumpian whim (for example, prioritization of the M3 and M6 over the Sherman because Trump believes more guns = better.)Isn't the USA actually.. fairly mediocre military and industry wise at this point in time?
A lot of their gains in tech came out of stuff the UK gave them as part of deals and trades for more support if I remember right? And obviously that isn't happening here.
I feel like the USA in this trajectory is going to be much, much weaker than OTL USA after the war.