AHC: A World without WW1

Likely a decent chunk of what was once Austria-Hungary, althought I can see the Germans keeping the Austrians alive with the Hapsburgs still. Plus, the Ottomans- they were already on their last legs at this point, they were going to fall apart sometime that century. I honestly don't see the Germans becoming a Republic unless the Kaiser pulls some stupid shit, as they were in a fairly good position to continue (compared to the other states I've listed) without collapse.
What about Italy and Spain?

I'm not sure if the Ottoman state is likely to fall apart without the extreme pressure of the World War. Tanzimât was well on its way and modernization efforts were progressing fairly successfully; it's largest problems will likely be the Public Debt Administration and European colonial pressure, but I'm not sure if it is likely to fall to revolution.
Do you see the Ottomans expanding into the Arabian Peninsula in this scenario? As in, into the interior of this peninsula.
 
What about Italy and Spain?
Hm, Spain perhaps, but I really don't see Italy going into a republic- not super certain about turn-of-the-century Italian politics, but from my meagre understanding of of the subject I'm fairly sure that until WW2 the monarchy was still quite popular with the liberals. Obviously the Communists, who weren't particularly infatuated with the monarchy, were a fairly big influence at the time, but the lack of a European war would likely mean they don't have the chance to actually pull any form of SR off.
 
Hm, Spain perhaps, but I really don't see Italy going into a republic- not super certain about turn-of-the-century Italian politics, but from my meagre understanding of of the subject I'm fairly sure that until WW2 the monarchy was still quite popular with the liberals. Obviously the Communists, who weren't particularly infatuated with the monarchy, were a fairly big influence at the time, but the lack of a European war would likely mean they don't have the chance to actually pull any form of SR off.
I'm surprised that the Italian liberals continued to support the Italian monarchy after the Italian King helped put Mussolini in power.
 
Admittedly by the point Mussolini marched on Rome, he had several generals outright supporting him and his militias had already taken control of of the PO plains as well as the country's strategy points raising the fear of civil war if the establishment dared to oppose him, Its unclear he would get that far though without the historical world war one and the aftermath setting the stage for him to be able to gather large numbers of followers.

In some of this alternative timelines we could well see him trying to pull the same thing but without near the amount of support he had in the OTL he had leading him to instead getting crushed and being only a minor footnote in history but it also quite possible he never goes down the path he did in the OTL and never really entering popular

In Spain I suspect what will might happen is a civil war that lasts longer with no clear winner only both sides being forced to come to some sort of agreement to stop the fighting in spite of both sides hating each other and doing some rather horrific things.
 
Admittedly by the point Mussolini marched on Rome, he had several generals outright supporting him and his militias had already taken control of of the PO plains as well as the country's strategy points raising the fear of civil war if the establishment dared to oppose him, Its unclear he would get that far though without the historical world war one and the aftermath setting the stage for him to be able to gather large numbers of followers.

In some of this alternative timelines we could well see him trying to pull the same thing but without near the amount of support he had in the OTL he had leading him to instead getting crushed and being only a minor footnote in history but it also quite possible he never goes down the path he did in the OTL and never really entering popular

In Spain I suspect what will might happen is a civil war that lasts longer with no clear winner only both sides being forced to come to some sort of agreement to stop the fighting in spite of both sides hating each other and doing some rather horrific things.
Mussolini might remain a socialist without WWI, no?

As for Spain, what kind of agreement are you thinking of here?
 
He did seem to think himself as many modern monarchists think monarchs work today, in that he thought he was some fairy-tale king who used fairy magic to support his peasants and therefore they didn't need silly things like rights and food. Of course, most Russians were actually rather sane, so it's not likely Nicky would have made it to the end of his natural life without being shot or deposed in some way. Not sure if I've said this here, but I'm fairly certain something like February was inevitable under Nicholas II.
If Russia eventually descends into another revolution without World War I *and* this new revolution is actually successful (unlike the one in 1905-1906), could some other Great Powers--such as Germany, Austria-Hungary, and/or the Ottoman Empire--use this revolution as an opportunity to support various separatist movements in Russia? Specifically the Poles, Balts, Finns, Ukrainians, Caucasian, and/or Central Asian peoples.
 
Mussolini might remain a socialist without WWI, no?

As for Spain, what kind of agreement are you thinking of here?

Hmm honestly I am unsure exactly I suspect it would most likely involve decentralization in Spanish governance as well as allowing for for autonomy for the Basques and Catalonians far sooner than had happened historally and likely at least something involving the monarchy in some capacity.

The only thing I am sure of is that Carlists would likely once again fail to get their candidate on the throne unless they somehow end up as power brokers needed to reach a final agreement.
 
Last edited:
Hmm honestly I am unsure exactly I suspect it would most likely involve decentralization in Spanish governance as well as allowing for for autonomy for the Basques and Catalonians far sooner than had happened historally and likely at least something involving the monarchy in some compacity.

*Capacity (not compacity)

Anyway, something similar to what Spain has right now?

The only thing I am sure of is that Carlists would likely once again fail to get their candidate on the throne unless they somehow end up as power brokers needed to reach a final agreement.

I thought that the Carlist movement had largely flamed out by 1900 or so?
 
The Carlists were still around and active as during the Spanish civil war as a minor nationalist aligned faction but they were vastly outnumbered by the Alfonsists and pretty much everyone on the nationalist side preferred to sideline them politically speaking from what I gathered.
 
The Carlists were still around and active as during the Spanish civil war as a minor nationalist aligned faction but they were vastly outnumbered by the Alfonsists and pretty much everyone on the nationalist side preferred to sideline them politically speaking from what I gathered.
Gotcha; thank you!
 
If Russia eventually descends into another revolution without World War I *and* this new revolution is actually successful (unlike the one in 1905-1906), could some other Great Powers--such as Germany, Austria-Hungary, and/or the Ottoman Empire--use this revolution as an opportunity to support various separatist movements in Russia? Specifically the Poles, Balts, Finns, Ukrainians, Caucasian, and/or Central Asian peoples.
Really depends. Germany would absolutely, unless the Lo3E is still in place, then they'd probably not want to end up losing their alliance and looking like a backstabber. The Austrians would almost certainly not, they're already on shaky ground and encouraging Polish and Ukrainian independence movements is just asking to end up in a civil war. The Ottomans might want to create some buffer states with Russia & push them to at least Ciscaucasia (especially because it might allow them to do a population Transfer with Armenia, which looks much better than just downright genocide), but nobody but Britain would really have the power projection to actually help out with pushing the Russians out of Central Asia- and I'm willing to bet they absolutely would, considering the Russian history with trying to fuck with the Raj.
 
Really depends. Germany would absolutely, unless the Lo3E is still in place, then they'd probably not want to end up losing their alliance and looking like a backstabber.

How far do the Germans go?

Also, does France try to militarily defend its ally Russia's territorial integrity?

The Austrians would almost certainly not, they're already on shaky ground and encouraging Polish and Ukrainian independence movements is just asking to end up in a civil war. The Ottomans might want to create some buffer states with Russia & push them to at least Ciscaucasia (especially because it might allow them to do a population Transfer with Armenia, which looks much better than just downright genocide),

Would the Armenians actually agree to such a population exchange, though? Plus, the Ottomans might--like the Nazis did with the Jews--plunder the Armenians of most or all of their wealth before deporting/expelling them. (The Jews who left Nazi Germany were often pauperized by the Nazis beforehand to my knowledge.)

but nobody but Britain would really have the power projection to actually help out with pushing the Russians out of Central Asia- and I'm willing to bet they absolutely would, considering the Russian history with trying to fuck with the Raj.

But the Brits actually need to cross Afghanistan first in order for them to successfully pull this off. Also, their strength in Central Asia would need to be sufficiently strong as to deter Russia from ever reconquering this region once Russia actually got back onto its feet.
 
How far do the Germans go?

Fairly far, they'd probably support as many as they could afford to- anywhere from just the Baltic and Poland to Terek and Karelia being independent.

Also, does France try to militarily defend its ally Russia's territorial integrity?

Possibly? If it's just the Germans funding the independence movements then it's very plausible that the French would, but the more people dog-piling on the Russians the less likely are the French to try and intervene.

Would the Armenians actually agree to such a population exchange, though? Plus, the Ottomans might--like the Nazis did with the Jews--plunder the Armenians of most or all of their wealth before deporting/expelling them. (The Jews who left Nazi Germany were often pauperized by the Nazis beforehand to my knowledge.)

You are, of course presuming that the Ottomans would care. Just invade the area in the name of liberation, take all of the Turks out, then dump all of the Armenians in Anatolia and then poof, you've got the whole thing under control.

But the Brits actually need to cross Afghanistan first in order for them to successfully pull this off. Also, their strength in Central Asia would need to be sufficiently strong as to deter Russia from ever reconquering this region once Russia actually got back onto its feet.
I'm not too certain as to this, honestly. Planes existed by then, it's fairly easy to airdrop supplies, especially with a nation who's currently using their air-force to take out rebels in the West than the South.
 
Fairly far, they'd probably support as many as they could afford to- anywhere from just the Baltic and Poland to Terek and Karelia being independent.

Ukraine?

Possibly? If it's just the Germans funding the independence movements then it's very plausible that the French would, but the more people dog-piling on the Russians the less likely are the French to try and intervene.

Interesting.

You are, of course presuming that the Ottomans would care. Just invade the area in the name of liberation, take all of the Turks out, then dump all of the Armenians in Anatolia and then poof, you've got the whole thing under control.

Interesting approach. Also, I'm assuming that the Ottomans take back and re-annex all of the territory that they lost to Russia in 1878 (including Batumi/Adjara), but do they also annex any other territories?

I'm not too certain as to this, honestly. Planes existed by then, it's fairly easy to airdrop supplies, especially with a nation who's currently using their air-force to take out rebels in the West than the South.

How often were supplies airdropped during World War I in real life? Also, I just fear that supplies alone might not be enough for this but that actual British and/or British Imperial troops are actually going to required to sustain a separatist state (or separatist states, plural) in Central Asia in the long(er)-run.
 
Back
Top