- Location
- England
I'm a fan of Warhammer 40k and enjoy the lore in the it's based on and the creative discussions around the factions within it.
Having people discuss how the factions justify themselves and the degree to which these justifications hold water given the universe they live in is always fascinating to see and take part in.
I especially enjoy looking into character motivations for each of the characters because that's were the real tragedy of 40K lies for me. People choosing to take more responsibility for the future than they can handle because in their arrogance, they refuse to work together. To swallow their prode and hatred an work towards a future that they could both be happy.
Every time the world could be saved, but isn't because someone refused to acknowledge they needed help, or chose to backstab someone when they didn't need to fueling the cycles of paranoia and betrayal.
Unfortunately, any long term discussion of 40K eventually turns into a intractable argument about Fascism, with people holding intractable views driving the discus to a heated halt, and any fans of the franchise being made feel like shit for liking it, or getting the impression that defending any of there viewpoints would make them appear as crypto fascists on this board so not worth the social cost.
As such, I wanted to start a discussion into 40K that hopefully will be an interesting insight into the universe
Views must have a basis in the current lore of a faction.
Declaring everything ever written false and presenting your view as an alternative is not acceptable.
Declaring that based on the information given by any official source, that lines up with the general behaviour of the faction elsewhere, some things are true is acceptable.
Watsonian arguments only. Discussion about how the factions line up with various movements IRL, and significant minority of people that are using it as propaganda has been done to death on this forum and will not be discussed in this thread.
E.g.
· Most rebellions against the imperium have a point, and in any contest the imperium can easily win they are the Bad guys by 40K. - Fine
· The emperor/dark angels are chaos cultists/ wants humanity to fail - Not Fine
· Elements of the imperium line up with historical regimes, and as such it should face these structural issues based on this - Fine
· Elements of the imperium lines up with fascist ideology and are being co-opted to try and spread it by a minority in the player base – not fine, start a different thread to discuss rethread well trodden road this if your wish.
As a starting point
The Emperor
The Dark Eldar
Having people discuss how the factions justify themselves and the degree to which these justifications hold water given the universe they live in is always fascinating to see and take part in.
I especially enjoy looking into character motivations for each of the characters because that's were the real tragedy of 40K lies for me. People choosing to take more responsibility for the future than they can handle because in their arrogance, they refuse to work together. To swallow their prode and hatred an work towards a future that they could both be happy.
Every time the world could be saved, but isn't because someone refused to acknowledge they needed help, or chose to backstab someone when they didn't need to fueling the cycles of paranoia and betrayal.
Unfortunately, any long term discussion of 40K eventually turns into a intractable argument about Fascism, with people holding intractable views driving the discus to a heated halt, and any fans of the franchise being made feel like shit for liking it, or getting the impression that defending any of there viewpoints would make them appear as crypto fascists on this board so not worth the social cost.
As such, I wanted to start a discussion into 40K that hopefully will be an interesting insight into the universe
Views must have a basis in the current lore of a faction.
Declaring everything ever written false and presenting your view as an alternative is not acceptable.
Declaring that based on the information given by any official source, that lines up with the general behaviour of the faction elsewhere, some things are true is acceptable.
Watsonian arguments only. Discussion about how the factions line up with various movements IRL, and significant minority of people that are using it as propaganda has been done to death on this forum and will not be discussed in this thread.
E.g.
· Most rebellions against the imperium have a point, and in any contest the imperium can easily win they are the Bad guys by 40K. - Fine
· The emperor/dark angels are chaos cultists/ wants humanity to fail - Not Fine
· Elements of the imperium line up with historical regimes, and as such it should face these structural issues based on this - Fine
· Elements of the imperium lines up with fascist ideology and are being co-opted to try and spread it by a minority in the player base – not fine, start a different thread to discuss rethread well trodden road this if your wish.
As a starting point
The Emperor
Because of the way things lined up at the end of the Age of strife, there was a need for a military polity strong enough to 10 hold of the Orks, and 2) prevent the rise of major factions antithetical to human life to ensure that humanity could guarantee survival long term.
The only way humanity could hope to do this in time would be as a united front to pool resources and rediscover the Tech they'd just lost as it would take far to long to develop naturally.
They needed someone who could raise an army strong enough to hold back the darkness, and a government capable of holding all the disparate ways of life humanity had developed in the millennia since leaving Sol together.
They got the Emperor.
Due to his origins he was pretty much the only hope humanity had of making it through.
He was also a colossal ***hole. With no ability to handle peers who hadn't known him for millennia already (Malcador).
He had one job and barely squeaked by achieving the bare minimum required to say that those shamans did their job by building an Empire so big it has taken 10K years to fall, and still has a few to go.
The only shining light to his personality is that
1. He can learn humility and acknowledge mistakes by 42K and is acting as the protective presence his adherents believe him to be, because that's all he can do.
2. He sticks to his guns to the very end as even as a corpse he lives by the imperial motto "Only in Death, Does Duty End"
The only way humanity could hope to do this in time would be as a united front to pool resources and rediscover the Tech they'd just lost as it would take far to long to develop naturally.
They needed someone who could raise an army strong enough to hold back the darkness, and a government capable of holding all the disparate ways of life humanity had developed in the millennia since leaving Sol together.
They got the Emperor.
Due to his origins he was pretty much the only hope humanity had of making it through.
He was also a colossal ***hole. With no ability to handle peers who hadn't known him for millennia already (Malcador).
He had one job and barely squeaked by achieving the bare minimum required to say that those shamans did their job by building an Empire so big it has taken 10K years to fall, and still has a few to go.
The only shining light to his personality is that
1. He can learn humility and acknowledge mistakes by 42K and is acting as the protective presence his adherents believe him to be, because that's all he can do.
2. He sticks to his guns to the very end as even as a corpse he lives by the imperial motto "Only in Death, Does Duty End"
The Dark Eldar
The most evil faction in 40K as the others at least have the excuse that they either can't change their ways without self-destructing or don't know how (Imperium, people still falling into Chaos, the Eldar, what the Tau are turning into), or literally can't even consider the action (people who've fully fallen into Chaos, Orks, Nids, Low level Necrons).
The interesting thing about them is the younger dark eldar. Past a certain point, the dark eldar need to sustain themselves on suffering because they've lived to long (Vect), but the younger one's can leave anytime they want, but the society they life in actively discourages this as a likable option.
They are indoctrinated from birth to view all other life as dirt, sub-eldar trash who only have value as livestock at best.
Asking one of them to leave Commorragh, is like asking a teenage in the first world to give up all his worldly possessions and become a Monk (Craftworlders), shun nearly all tech and become a commune hippie (Maiden Worlder) or join the circus (Harlequin). To them it's just not an attractive prospect.
The fact that some of them do shows that they are capable of compassion, even if its at the "I don't want to spend every waking second of my day causing pain to others" level, and makes every one that stays in the City even more of a monster either via Cowardice or Malice.
The interesting thing about them is the younger dark eldar. Past a certain point, the dark eldar need to sustain themselves on suffering because they've lived to long (Vect), but the younger one's can leave anytime they want, but the society they life in actively discourages this as a likable option.
They are indoctrinated from birth to view all other life as dirt, sub-eldar trash who only have value as livestock at best.
Asking one of them to leave Commorragh, is like asking a teenage in the first world to give up all his worldly possessions and become a Monk (Craftworlders), shun nearly all tech and become a commune hippie (Maiden Worlder) or join the circus (Harlequin). To them it's just not an attractive prospect.
The fact that some of them do shows that they are capable of compassion, even if its at the "I don't want to spend every waking second of my day causing pain to others" level, and makes every one that stays in the City even more of a monster either via Cowardice or Malice.