- Location
- Sydney
[X] Firmness
Your first set of Royal Harem actions were a bit suboptimal; training Martial and SLing Zhang Lei was definitely the right move, but you would've been better off using one generic Network action directed towards the Royal Harem as a whole; it would've unlocked Lei Qi's SL earlier than literally the last day, for sure.
Yeah, let's clear that up real quick: You can always vote for the most general form of the action, or you could specify to achieve a certain effect. Note that you cannot just generically train, however; training requires you to focus on an area to improve.I had no idea that was even an option. The vote choices looked like they only allowed for specific harem members.
Hmm... we have quite a bit of money. Adventuring pays quite handsomely it seems.
Farming.... uh... doesn't. We should get people to farm for us so we can do other things. Maybe also find a doctor or something to patch us up on adventures? With that in mind:Marketplace (-20 Seasons of Crops, +100? Money) [LOCKED] If you're gonna harvest 'em, you might as well sell 'em. Waste not, want not, as Dad would say.
Kings tend to reward their rescuers handsomely yesHmm... we have quite a bit of money. Adventuring pays quite handsomely it seems.
Yes, but not as effectively as a direct Retainer action; as a Marketplace Action you'd essentially be accepting offers as side business rather than the active seeking you do as part of a direct Retainer Action.Any chance this can lead to us hiring a farmer? If not, then I'm on board with double retainer. Still need to limit break for useful martial training, so I'd prefer to gather people.
Cool. In that case, I'm going to go with a plan for recruiting people directly. Is it ok to include specifics like below, or should I adjust it to just two retainers actions?Kings tend to reward their rescuers handsomely yes
Yes, but not as effectively as a direct Retainer action; as a Marketplace Action you'd essentially be accepting offers as side business rather than the active seeking you do as part of a direct Retainer Action.
Yep. That level of specificity is fine, but it'll start to raise background roll thresholds because you're starting to explicitly reject candidates.Cool. In that case, I'm going to go with a plan for recruiting people directly. Is it ok to include specifics like below, or should I adjust it to just two retainers actions?
[X] Network (Charisma) You have no familial connections and yet you are a Baronet, the Baronet of Erse village. Time to act like one.
-[X] Traveling Retainer Someone with skills or connections who would be helpful and fun to go on adventures with
[X] Network (Charisma) You have no familial connections and yet you are a Baronet, the Baronet of Erse village. Time to act like one.
-[X] Estate Retainer Someone trustworthy who can look after our estate while we go adventuring.
Hmm... will it improve the chances of finding those candidates? Because there's probably other people who may be useful to have as retainers (e.g. merchants (though we've all but got one of those), doctors, scribes, etc) but I'd prioritize the "adventuring" and "estate manager" roles. That said, if all adding specificity does here is make it so we reject other candidates, then I'd prefer to go with the general action and working with whatever roles we get.Yep. That level of specificity is fine, but it'll start to raise background roll thresholds because you're starting to explicitly reject candidates.
It improves your chances of finding the specific candidates; for example, let's take your traveling retainer example (which by the way is pretty funny to me for reasons in update).Hmm... will it improve the chances of finding those candidates? Because there's probably other people who may be useful to have as retainers (e.g. merchants (though we've all but got one of those), doctors, scribes, etc) but I'd prioritize the "adventuring" and "estate manager" roles. That said, if all adding specificity does here is make it so we reject other candidates, then I'd prefer to go with the general action and working with whatever roles we get.
So something our Pride trait wouldn't allow without a blow to our self esteem.Retainers let us take actions without being there. So we won't need to keep going back just to keep our farm going.
Yeah yeah I'm on it. Character sheet updated.Ok first of all? Our character sheet REALLY needs updates @huhYeahGoodPoint
Secondly, what is reputation for? Doesn't really seem to do much.
And finally, the hell do we need retainers for? Sounds like a waste of actions to me. And damage to our pride.
That's not the way your Pride works. The way your Pride works is that you value your your own work highly; what you've done is significant, no matter what other people say, but at the same time, you know the value of your own work, and if someone offers to just...void all your hard work that doesn't sit right.So something our Pride trait wouldn't allow without a blow to our self esteem.