I don't like the whole "kill him and be done with it" parts of your plan at all. I want the info. I really want the info. (And then probably kill him).
If the drow refuses, we should (readied actions; non-lethal attacks) knock him out, Curse him, Ill Omen him, wake him, and then cast Suggestion+Detect thoughts.
I am also supremely uninterested in the following. Like, maybe it'd be good info to have and the governor might like that sort of thing, but when it comes to on-screen stuff I don't really care about drow internal house politics. :
---[ ] What Houses are ascendant and which are in decline?
----
Regardless, I strongly feel that the three-eyed drow elf lady and the "will you seek revenge" questions should be left to the very end:
The three-eyed drow question might risk running against "won't do stuff that risks your life".
Maybe rather than "what do you know" we'd get further with "what can you tell us about"?
The "will you seek revenge" question will either have a response of "no", or he won't be compelled to answer truthfully, and he'd have an opportunity to make a bluff check and lie "no".
----
@DragonParadox If we've Suggested someone to answer our questions with full and sincere honesty, and we ask a question that they belive will cause them direct threat to life and limb if they answer.
1. Does the Suggestion end there fully, or does it resume for the next question
2. If it ends there fully, do we know that it ends
3. If it's just suppressed/ignored/resisted for that one question, do we know that this happens (I don't mean via a Sense Motive check, I mean via a caster feeling their spells having an effect or not)
Edit: I'll be back at my laptop in about two hours, so I'll steal your plan because at this point it just feels more comforting to do that rather than make my own from scratch
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()