That was my elaboration though. We're Day 1 and Atoms is hard confirming the existence of a specific role, which they also are hard believing to be a cult. The only way they would know that it exists at this point is if they either have the role that they are claiming is a cult role, they are in communication with someone who has claimed the role and so are either a cultist or should know that it is most likely not a cult role in this game, or their role informs them as to the existence of the role which would be either an executioner style trying to get it killed or someone that just knows what all the roles in the game are which is unbelievable on the basis of "I don't recognize that role from past games" and "Hugh should really know better than to give the possibility for everyone to learn what all the roles are in this role madness game."
Furthermore, I'm Commander Rhodes and this is the best thread in the forums.
So fun question, but on the off chance he's not scum, are you gonna have any kind of explanation? I highly doubt you're 100% calling your shot right now, after all, so can we get the counterargument out of the way first?
[X] Vote Nictis
We're not just letting this slide right?
Need to do a proper read through as most of what I did is skim
What's "this" in this context? Please explain.
...Not sure why I'm even asking, someone's gonna ask before I catch up. Bleh.
btw, lots of weird stuff going with posts. Colors, phrases, all that. I'm not sure if it's just meming, emphasis, or trying to go "I'm doing a role thing~"
Thanks for explaining.
It's also occurred to me that, so I'm imagining it's occurred to the mafia and third parties as well, that given that this games is structured on content and roles from previous games, there is even more value in targeting veteran players than in normal games since they have the necessary experience to suss out roles based on prior play. I think we should adapt our playstyle with this in mind.
But who would actually have participated in all those games? Sure, vets would play more than people who have this as their first or third game on the site, but there's no way anyone has enough experience to not have huge blindspots everywhere.
If hugh went back to 2016 games, which he apparently did
I don't disbelieve you, just curious on source.
btw, just gonna say I'm not comfortable with the atom votes. It feels like a pressure vote for info that's going to get, uh. A Result, rather than something that's gonna get them lynched. I don't know what that Result is, but I feel the phantom sieve of infoleaking.
Which is weird because I like the arguments for the votes? They make sense. I just... don't get a good feeling of the overall momentum.
...and then bean makes a much better statement against the wagon with way better arguments, bleh.
To clarify, I'm deeply unhappy with being a vanilla in an expected power madness game, but a proper lady doesn't let her emotions get the better of her.
fwiw, I don't believe you either. At this point, I'm half-thinking the fluff of the role you got is a compulsive liar, so you're rolling with it.
forums.sufficientvelocity.com
