"Geez, these are a lot of questions. Let me see what answers I can muster."
The WW4, I assume, is the one between the UN and the GTO. What is the WW3 about?
"Yeah, WW4 (if that's what the historians will end up calling it) was between us and the GTO. In terms of raw geopolitics, it was honestly really similar to WW3, though that was more about everyone ganging up on China. Poor China, they still haven't recovered from that. They were lucky the US bowed out when they did, or they wouldn't have been able to force the rest of them to a standstill."
"Oh, and the Dual Revolution, of course, that's what we call the end of WW3. Kind of how WW1 lead into the Russian and German revolutions."
What is the Gaiic Technology?
"Gaiic technology, or Gaia technology, is an admittedly hubristic attempt to try and create a god where nature is found wanting. More technically, it's a series of pilot programs that aim to manage ecosystems through a new kind of sapient AI. Gaze seems excited about it, but I wouldn't know."
What is the UNETC? They are the only one who did not seem to existed in the early 21st century.
"Oh, there's a bunch of agencies that we've added since then; the UNETC isn't one of them, though. Back then, it was just the defunct UN Trusteeship Council. We appended the 'Ecological' part."
There is a mention of the Sixth Internationale, is this another name for the UN or are they a separate organisation?
"It's a bit of a metonym. We run a new Internationale out of the old Department for Political Affairs. It mostly works to enforce socialist governing standards, keep everyone on the same page. You don't need to be a diehard communist or anything (indeed, some of them work for the other side)."
What role does UNSC plays in the 22nd century UN? Is there any called for further reform?
"Having thrown off a bunch of dead weight in the wake of the Dual Revolution, the UNSC now acts much more like a well-coordinated military alliance than a big veto machine. We already added permanent representation for the most vulnerable among us; what more do you want?"
- This association - and the UN in general - are, from the vibe - such as the fact that you are long serving civil servant, rather bureaucratic. Is there any call to democratise UN bureaucracy? And if so, is there any plan to pursuit in this matter outside of the proposed sortition for the vice-chair
(that I am not going to vote because I have zero faith that RNG will not screwed us over at the worse time)?
- Accordingly, to which degree has the UN responsibility and authority extended to member polities? That is, how much power we can wield in comparison to our member state? Further more, is there any movement for trying to transform the UN into a single polity?
- In the opposite of the previous question, is there any movement to dissolve UN or it's member polities in favour of a more anarchistic system of governance? If they existed and are powerful, what would you do if such movement come to power?
"I am going to treat these as one question, since they seem to be getting at the same thing ("are you a tyrant, ms. Pendragon?"). Compared to whatever earlier reference point you might care for, the UN is more democratic than ever. The General Assembly is weighted by population, and we've finally stopped excluding certain stateless peoples from it. In the executive branch, we're mostly focused on building in an Algedonic Reflex. That is to say, we want the top of our organization to be able to respond to its deepest roots in moments of profound dysfunction. Other than that, good management is mostly about letting your subsidiaries do their thing. That's what the cyberneticists tell me, at least."
How much threat does the GTO represent to the implementation of HALE Initiative? What is the current level of hostility between us and them?
"If they're purely internal matters, they're unlikely to bother us. Outside of that, it's a constant standoff. Much of it comes down to trying to work past one another. But a future confrontation seems inevitable."
What exactly is the Escapist and what is their Sovereignty? A refuge into a stimulated realities?
"It'd almost be easier to point to those movements that aren't Escapist in some fashion. Generally speaking though, Escapism represents a mass trauma response in the wake of societal breakdown and ecodeath. Using the novel technologies of the past centuries, Escapists attempt to reshape the world (whether Real or Virtual) according to their whims. Now, the Canberra Accords force us to accommodate these people insofar as they're only using their own allotted land and resources. When they turn Vampiric though, they're fair game for UNATCO."