yep! just hit someone up in messages and get them to buy and redeem markers from you every now and then as needed
It should definitely affect what people value future markers at.
Sure. I'll take it.I'm selling my vote for this update for 1 marker with a veto but the veto can't be used for any vote I choose that has Fish in it.
Would you be OK if I reserve a Veto for this vote only and then treat it as a no-veto marker from now on? Then future wagers with me will always specify that markers are veto-free.
@Aabcehmu: same request. If you both object then we'll just say no veto at all.
lol. I realized that I had a lot of argument power but didn't have a veto. My thought was that I could get someone to buy my vote for this update, which would lock me into a contract & prevent marker activation. In exchange I'd offer a marker for 2K words of omake power, deployable whenever the purchaser and I happen to agree on a vote.
Honestly, I hadn't thought far enough to universalize the concept. The half-sentence fragment was from a draft that obviously hadn't been written to completion.Wouldn't such a system basically make markers worthless? You could just sell your vote for free to a conspirator for every vote you're invested in.
isn't our combat strength insufficient for the task we set out for, though? I think we need this feat and the time to safely tackle the Tower.
So, just quickly checking, but how would you rate the combat strength of Crown+ADS compared to OaF? I'm bringing it up because they're pretty close price-wise. (26 vs 23)Well, you are halfway to OaF already! That would yield a much larger supply of power for Hunger to draw on...
So, just quickly checking, but how would you rate the combat strength of Crown+ADS compared to OaF? I'm bringing it up because they're pretty close price-wise. (26 vs 23)
I'll promise to use a token during this arc, but I don't need you to buy my vote. @LordOfMurder pointed out that such a conspiracy is essentially bad-faith retraction of sold vote markers, which I don't want to do.Would you be willing to promise to use one of my markers at or before the end of the Tower arc? If so, I'd be willing to take this deal for that in lieu of the 2K words of omake power.
I was mostly freaking out about being in debt for the first time. It was a lapse in judgment that I won't repeat.
SoldI don't know much about vote trading, but I'll dip my toe in. I am willing to give Level 0 Markers to anyone who votes for Laissez-faire. Level 0 Markers are useless, you cannot use them to change my voting behavior, or in any other way, but I will permit you to write that I owe you a Level 0 Marker in your signature. :s
How would a hyptothetical crown+OaF vs ADS + OaF stack against one another? Is the 0.5 difference big enough to deal with the advantage offered by ADS?OaF is much stronger for most purposes. Rank 9.375 Bloodcasting overwhelms!
Yay, participation! Thank you for helping me feel included. :3
I'll give you 2 runeblue markers in exchange for your 1 Zampano marker and 1 Talace markerNah, I feel you. I too am in debt for the first time and (though I realise my attempts at doing so have been very subtle ) am trying my utmost to wiggle my way out.
I'll give you 2 runeblue markers in exchange for your 1 Zampano marker and 1 Talace marker
(if you confirm that Talace's marker is tradable)
1. whoops. You even marked it down under "debts." I should stop trying to play the quest while I have real work open.Nah, Talace is the other person I owe markers to so I have nothing to sell. That said, if I'm not providing a worthwhile service, I don't want you to feel as though you need to accommodate my desire to escape so feel free to keep them for as long as you like. I knew what I was doing when I bought those markers and will try to wheel and deal my way out of them fair and square.
doesn't that incentivize otherwise disinterested parties to put light effort into opposing you so that in future votes you're less able to rally as much power?Anyway, don't bet against me unless you're ready for me to go hard.
I will say that the Decimator's Affliction does not necessarily provoke people to attack you - they have to figure out that you're the source first, the speed of which depends on a number of factions including the sophistication of their civilization. And by the time they've determined that, you may have mitigated the Affliction in a way that transfers the costs elsewhere.
I mean, I'm not going to go over like a bull seeing red. If I see my opposition is playing soft I'm only going to go hard enough to make them regret not taking it seriously, not so much that I'm going to be out of it for the next vote.doesn't that incentivize otherwise disinterested parties to put light effort into opposing you so that in future votes you're less able to rally as much power?
Actually, since we already have Uttermost and Inherit the World, SJUC would only push us to 2 slots free. Post-Stranglethorn, it'd probably still be pickable, though? (Citation.)I hope not. If that is the case, the only way that we'd have the slots for that is if we took Super Juggernaut Undead Chimera as our next Defining Advancement so we'd have three free slots.
I'm going to be optimistic and think that it won't. Let's see how foolish I was or wasn't in a few updates.
Defining Advancement. If chosen, you may have no more than five Defining Advancements.