williams1996
Alba gu bràth
- Location
- Scotland
Im just gonna sit this vote out since giving her and not giving her the press have advantages and i cant make my mind up.
1. Yes, torture is normal, as is spying. Which is the reason why basically throwing a tantrum with the stormlands is stupid and self-defeating.This is medieval world,torturing is normal to gain information,not to punish.Book monopoly will hold as no worker know exactly how the press is built.
Stormland can trade and gain favors with the citadel so we lost a major diplomatic tool with the citadel.
Our interest is to our house and our kingdom,not other kingdoms. And you seem to forgetthat in this period a kingdom is loose colection of noble houses with various purpose,loyalities and likes.So to give someone a tool that can be used against us is stupid.
1. And what will happen the next time Argella wants something, something we're not at all inclined to give to her?1. ...I'm saying it will hurt relations with the Stormlands, and get in the way of further beneficial cooperation.
2. That's a pretty semantic point, which ignores the fact that it's espionage regardless.
3. This is nothing like Tywin, and if you decided to make it so that would arguably be worse. Tywin was successful because everyone knew what he'd done, and he'd eliminated any enemies he had in the process. For this to be like Castamere, we'd need to publicly execute them, or hang up their bodies, and tell everyone what had happened. That would send a message, sure. But it would also absolutely destroy any chances for a good relationship with the Stormlands forever, and would also create a powerful enemy. That's not something Tywin would do, because he wasn't stupid enough to value pride above great power politics and political necessity.
Have we voted to do that? Show me, please.As such, you're basically throwing a tantrum about something that we would eventually have shared anyway, which makes it even more pointless.
Ask Britain how Chamberlain's appeasement worked out for them, lol.Which is the reason why basically throwing a tantrum with the stormlands is stupid and self-defeating.
I'm not sure that's the case - one person is voting for two of those, so I think it adds up to 9. In other words, we're currently in a three way tie.If I combine all the "Send a Printing Press" votes, which I think is fair, they win by 1.
In that case I'll stick with the winning vote:If I combine all the "Send a Printing Press" votes, which I think is fair, they win by 1.
Ask Britain how Chamberlain's appeasement worked out for them, lol.
@Redhead222 @Seyum @Chacmon @The Way It Is @One Autumn Leaf @Fallout5368 @Elder Haman @Gingganz @Resonant
You guys are all voting for the same thing, but your votes are split, even though you actually have as many people backing your core option as the other two main options. I would really suggest that you harmonise and sort your votes out, maybe by approval voting for each other or something.
The next time Argella wants something, she'll know to try asking first. And if we don't want to give it to her then we'll have advance warning that she might want to steal it. She'll also know that if she wants more of what we have in future, and if she wants our cooperation, then she won't try stealing, or else she'll miss out.1. And what will happen the next time Argella wants something, something we're not at all inclined to give to her?
Dude, we'd totally have tried to steal from her and others if we knew they had revolutionary technological advances. The fact we haven't done so is simply because there's been no opportunity. It doesn't mean that were somehow morally superior here - did you forget that we literally have a bunch of professional assassins on our payroll?2. No, it is not. We're spying on each other, and thank Dice we have the better spies so we know who's watching us. But, where we have the goodwill to pursue the alliance, she's trying to steal from us.
Yes, an eye for an eye is popular, but you seemed to have missed the part about how that also inspires grudges and hostility. Just because it's normal doesn't mean it's something that won't cause a grudge.3. ... I'm not arguing to visit upon Argella what Tywin did to the Reynes. It was just an example of an eye for an eye that's popular in that kind of society. Calm down.
That's basically your plan dude. It has an explicit risk of genuinely upsetting her and causing her to hold a grudge, and more broadly it will also lead to frostier relations, since killing people isn't exactly something that engenders warmth or encourages alliances. At the very least it will make negotiating any sort of agreement horrendously awkward, if nothing else.
That's a pretty ridiculous and dishonest comparison. Hitler had literally written a book that might as well have been entitled "I want to invade and conquer Eastern Europe", where he laid out all his political ideas in advance, and it was entirely predictable that he would renege.Ask Britain how Chamberlain's appeasement worked out for them, lol.
How will she know, if her intrigue check fails and she does not suspect that we traded the printing press for the books, because our spies knew she would attempt to steal it? What if the spies change the cipher? What if in the future she doesn't have anything else we would value, and attempts to steal our shit anyway?The next time Argella wants something, she'll know to try asking first. And if we don't want to give it to her then we'll have advance warning that she might want to steal it. She'll also know that if she wants more of what we have in future, and if she wants our cooperation, then she won't try stealing, or else she'll miss out.
Sure. But I'd feel bad about it cause she would be our ally. The point is, we didn't.Dude, we'd totally have tried to steal from her and others if we knew they had revolutionary technological advances. The fact we haven't done so is simply because there's been no opportunity. It doesn't mean that were somehow morally superior here - did you forget that we literally have a bunch of professional assassins on our payroll?
Added to that, you're also making a big mistake by thinking that this means there's no "goodwill". It isn't malicious or personal in the slightest. It's great power politics and the realities of rule. As I have repeatedly said, allies do this kind of thing to each other all the time, and making a fuss, and missing out on the opportunity for an ally against Harren and Loren, is stupid.
I feel like I'm not being very clear. If we just repel/kill the thieves and go to the negotiating table acting like we don't know Argella sent them, how will that hurt relationships? No accusations. No blame. We don't intimate that she orchestrated it. She'll write it off as a bad investment.That's basically your plan dude. It has an explicit risk of genuinely upsetting her and causing her to hold a grudge, and more broadly it will also lead to frostier relations, since killing people isn't exactly something that engenders warmth or encourages alliances. At the very least it will make negotiating any sort of agreement horrendously awkward, if nothing else.
One more time. Stop the theft, because the Starks are not incompetent morons, and act like we didn't discover who sent them so as not to damage diplomatic relations with the Stormlands.
And don't forget. She needs us more than we need her. Her father is off adventuring in Essos with their army and Harren is within spitting distance.
(The Letter: 1d100+20 (Jeyne's Diplomacy) = 115. 1d100+15 = 113. 1d100+13 = 77)
(Catching the Change: 1d100+19 (Snow's Intrigue) +10 (Counterintelligence Bonus) + 15 (Compromised Network) = 53)
A 95, a 98, and 64 respectively on our letter rolls, friggin' amazing.Phew, I'm glad that worked out, those are great rolls for the letter.
Just out of curiosity what skill would we need for this. I'm asking because it doesn't seem to be something that martial skill would be all that useful.The Sundering of the Drowned: Difficulty: Extraordinary. Power: Potent. Price: The blood of servants of the Drowned Ones and servants of the Old Gods mingled with certain herbs drunk by the one who will perform a ritual. They will enter a dream where they must fend off the temptations of the Drowned Ones or perish. Effect: As long as they are in the dream, the magic of servants of the Drowned Ones will not heed their will, failing or backfiring or acting unpredictably. Called creatures will turn against their masters. Mutations will tear themselves away from those who bear them or simply cease functioning.