Okay, so thread- I think it's time we actually plan how we're going to build our military in the near future so we don't keep putting it off. Divisions on whether to immediately pursue infantry, or officers, or what have you is diluting interest enough to prevent anything from getting done there and is liable to do so for a while.
In that interest, I think we should develop a new multi-role fighter and focus on getting at least a thousand or two of it into service so we actually have a way of projecting force. The Templar has an all missile layout in addition to a lack of variety of payloads. We should pursue a single flexible design here that can leverage our air advantage without immense time investments.
So, because I'm on the phone- and curious how people expand on this let's say the requirements are as follows; must carry at least some kind of laser weapon, be capable of carrying either 2 cruise missiles, 10 JDAMs, 4 torpedoes, or 10 various air-to-air missiles. It's preferable if it can fulfill one of the aforementioned load outs while carrying parts of another strike package.
Quench guns are the improved Gauss weapons from the Foundry project. Tech trading/buying will unlock on a case by case basis. With the military alliance you meet the minimum requirements, but Australia is still reluctant to share their proprietary tech. This will change as your relationship deepens and trust builds. This will happen in the background so long as you maintain the alliance. It can be accelerated by taking actions which involve cooperation with Australia.
So do they have any idea on how much of a tech lead we have? You gave us the techs they have but we don't, do they have any incharacter awareness that, hey, the Americans are trying to build as many alien alloys as they can? Or that we have fusion?
Which does bring up an interesting point- will alien alloys be a potential trade good? Because if so, proliferating the tech to people like Australia while we make Excellent AM foundries seems like it could be printing money.