- Location
- Texas
Moratorium is now over. Voting is open.
Plan The Way:
[X] The Law
[X] Optimiate
[X] Traditionalist
GM, is it alright if we do an omake to find a Roman Engineer? I have a few ideas to upgrade siege equipment.
Omakes are accepted, and you're certainly gifted enough in Military and Intelligence to have some genuine insights to the usage/construction of siege equipment. Keep it realistic, though — don't invent counterweight trebuchets a dozen centuries early, for example.
That is a very good point. I like Idealist because it struck me as the closest match to Cicero , but you're right that there is a notable lack of a standard-bearer for the Optimates, which is a major opportunity.-Politics: I went Conservative Optimate because it feels like a natural outgrowth of the time we would have grown up in. (Populares have been causing trouble for around the last fifty years.) There's more flexibility in it than the Traditional option (which reads to me as hardcore Catonian), and (again, IMO) seems the closest match to the politic of Cicero and Drusus the Younger. There's also the fact that, OTL, after the death of Catulus and the effective retirements of Hortensius and Lucullus, the Optimates lacked anyone with the dignitas and auctoritas to provide a counterbalance for Cato and his ilk. There's a possible opportunity there, both to increase our own standing and possibly even to preserve the Republic.
That is a very good point. I like Idealist because it struck me as the closest match to Cicero , but you're right that there is a notable lack of a standard-bearer for the Optimates, which is a major opportunity.
My problem with both Optimate options is the overt dogmatism -- Traditionalist is obviously inclined to 'nobility should hold power because tradition!' but I worry that 'Conservative' might point us towards an idea of 'nobility should hold power because they are better people' (that is, leading us to dismiss the worth and value of non-nobilis, potentially including Cicero). At the same time, you're right that a Conservative view might inspire us to be the better man, drive us to actually make ourselves the best and brightest.
...I'm gonna think about this some more. I'm going to be afk for quite a few hours, but I'd love to hear what others have to say.
I think that maybe a clarification on what Conservative Optimates stand for might be useful @Telamon, if you don't mind.
Omakes are accepted, and you're certainly gifted enough in Military and Intelligence to have some genuine insights to the usage/construction of siege equipment. Keep it realistic, though — don't invent counterweight trebuchets a dozen centuries early, for example.
They believe in the strict seperation of plebeian and patrician, and while they support the continued power of the Senate, it is largely because the Senate is mainly patrician. They believe in a whole lot of concepts that essentially boil down to: "We're on top because we're the most suitable people to lead Rome — if we weren't, we wouldn't be on top." Keeping the balance of society the way it is will ultimately preserve the Republic.
The traditionalists hold fast to the mors maiorum, the way of the ancestors. This is good to do because tradition demands it. The Senate is on top because it's always been on top. They genuinely believe that the Republic is a net good for Rome and her people, and that it's preservation pleases the gods. They generally understand the need for change or reform, as long as it stays fast to the old ways. They especially respect strength, bravery, self-sufficiency, and piety — the virtues of Rome since her founding.
But... what if we need to launch a 90kg projectile over 300 meters?
I was actually looking for very, very early artillery pieces laced with Greek fire. Of this isn't doable, maybe upgraded Ballistae.
That might be too OP still. I'll get to work and PM you a potential omake in a few days or so.