Kir the Wizard
The Sun King
- Location
- Ukraine
I think there is some important synergy with this option we cannot miss:
[] [Sanse] Send her home as agreed with Eddard Stark. (Write-In escorts and route)
In canon Sansa was kept in KL, and it didn't stop Robb's campaign a bit. Edmure might not be interested in the matter that much, since he's not the vassal of the King in the North yet, and doesn't have Queen Mother Catelyn probing him on the matter. So keeping Sansa when, as the post points out, it was agreed with Eddard to release them together, puts us in the canon situation, but there's also a pissed off Ned telling his family not to trust us. Yeah, on paper, having a hostage sounds more logical, but it didn't work out so well in canon, and might just destroy the agreement with Ned to keep out. Let him do that and have the Starks focus on searching for Arya, instead of winning Sansa back.
Though the gamble with offering Edmure handship is an interesting one, but one I wonder if will be allowed, considering Cersei's character and intended role as keeping the chair warm for Tywin's arrival.
[] [Sanse] Send her home as agreed with Eddard Stark. (Write-In escorts and route)
-[] [Sansa] Keep her hostage for the time being. She is still good leverage against the Starks.
-[] Letter: Write to Riverrun, offering to appoint Edmure as Hand of the King implicitly in exchange for raising their banners for Joffrey and condemning the Apostate Pretenders. Offer what concessions we can to sweeten the pot, including the status of Sansa, possible betrothals, further court appointments in King's Landing, etc.
Guys, remember the previous story post. Eddard refused to abdicate until Sansa's status was questioned. He was also pissed off at Baelish betraying his word and promised to get better. I think if we want Eddard to stick to his word and the North to stay at home and prepare for winter, we need to release them both, together.[] [Eddard] Send him to the Wall by land. You trust that he will honor the agreement and not try to renege on it once he is in the North.
Were Eddard Stark any other man I would be very dubious at the prospect of just letting him go under present circumstances. A reasonable person might conclude that an oath made under duress is no oath to keep . If he were a reasonable man he would not be in this position as he would not have tried to get Cersei to run or at the very least he would have believed Baelish when he said he could not be trusted
[] [Sansa] Keep her hostage for the time being. She is still good leverage against the Starks.
That said keep Sansa, if Eddard is not dead but abdicated Rob will still be Lord Paramount and he will need a reason not to do something silly. The threat to his sister should do it. If he wants her back he is going to have to make some concessions
In canon Sansa was kept in KL, and it didn't stop Robb's campaign a bit. Edmure might not be interested in the matter that much, since he's not the vassal of the King in the North yet, and doesn't have Queen Mother Catelyn probing him on the matter. So keeping Sansa when, as the post points out, it was agreed with Eddard to release them together, puts us in the canon situation, but there's also a pissed off Ned telling his family not to trust us. Yeah, on paper, having a hostage sounds more logical, but it didn't work out so well in canon, and might just destroy the agreement with Ned to keep out. Let him do that and have the Starks focus on searching for Arya, instead of winning Sansa back.
Though the gamble with offering Edmure handship is an interesting one, but one I wonder if will be allowed, considering Cersei's character and intended role as keeping the chair warm for Tywin's arrival.