Although shouldn't we also include Triton's Fury for the Keeling as well? Getting the Level 5 and 4 for this penance sounds like the best course of action.
Do you really want to perspective shift to Magnus that badly? Lol
The QM has all but said that giving away the Greatships won't hurt Ostland's defence. It is however an injury to pride and coin. So why are there still posters insisting that the QM is wrong.
I do.I would be a LOT more comfortable with a plan that doesn't involve keelhauling along literally the nastiest ship in the fleet. Freddy's got a lot of ways to get medical attention, but shit could go horribly wrong, and I'm going to be a lot less happy about Freddy dying than I would be about losing a few greatships.
Anyone got a plan that involves major sacrifices but picks a not-maximally-deadly keelhauling option?
The QM has all but said that giving away the Greatships won't hurt Ostland's defence. It is however an injury to pride and coin. So why are there still posters insisting that the QM is wrong.
This line of reasoning seems to be trying to metagame the sacrifice into "it's not really a sacrifice guys!"Exactly. The whole point of this talk and there being a chance to fix this was that Maghda wants this settled so that the followers and people in Ostland do not have to suffer.
She will not cripple Ostland's defenses. If we give her all the greatships, they will not all disappear from Ostland's shores.
We'll just have to ask the cult to cooperate if we want to use those particular greatships. Future greatships we build will of course be entirely ours.
I mean. It won't really hurt Ostland's defense to have those greatships operating out of other ports, and fighting the good fight. Unless the Cult of Manaan decides they have a "ride or die" naval emergency in the southern oceans far from Ostland waters... but that's the same kind of situation where we might quite rationally want to send a squadron down that way ourselves, for the same reason we sent troops to the defense of Nuln and to aid in the cleansing of Sylvania.The QM has all but said that giving away the Greatships won't hurt Ostland's defence. It is however an injury to pride and coin. So why are there still posters insisting that the QM is wrong.
So the worst of both worlds? I don't exactly see how one manages the optics of 'Okay let's bring him up to be healed first then continued'.I do.
Level 4 done twice, no wearing the LoS, healing in between.
Ride or die would probably have us send our faster ships.I mean. It won't really hurt Ostland's defense to have those greatships operating out of other ports, and fighting the good fight. Unless the Cult of Manaan decides they have a "ride or die" naval emergency in the southern oceans far from Ostland waters... but that's the same kind of situation where we might quite rationally want to send a squadron down that way ourselves, for the same reason we sent troops to the defense of Nuln and to aid in the cleansing of Sylvania.
So the worst of both worlds? I don't exactly see how one manages the optics of 'Okay let's bring him up to be healed first then continued'.
The optics is that we'd be doing repeated keelhaulings and suffer extra.[] Refusal: Perhaps you can negotiate for other ships, other tasks? Repeated keelhaulings or something? (Write-In)
She's literally doing her best to make the sacrifice not-hurt as much as possible and has been repeatedly backed up by repeated QM's statements to that effect.This line of reasoning seems to be trying to metagame the sacrifice into "it's not really a sacrifice guys!"
While it might be true, it's still metagaming.
Maybe get QM's confirmation to that effect, that one Keelhaul split among into many is somehow more valuable than a single one, as opposed to asserting it cause I'm like pretty sure based on common sense that it will go down rather poorly as opposed to a single Keelhaul.The optics is that we'd be doing repeated keelhaulings and suffer extra.
This is Significant enough to be something our options suggest as an alternative to sacrificing Greatships.
It's a sacrifice, but it's a sacrifice of Frederick's wealth, prestige, and personal power much more than it is a sacrifice of the security of Ostland. The two things are not the same.This line of reasoning seems to be trying to metagame the sacrifice into "it's not really a sacrifice guys!"
While it might be true, it's still metagaming.
Well, I think there's room for debate whether we should give away, like, two ships or three. Not a 'big dick energy' question. Also I feel bad about giving away the ship named for Natasha, and would rather give away the ship named for Oskar, who (I gather/am told) wanted to be a sailor. A ship dedicated to Manaan would be a good monument, while it hits Frederick emotionally without disrespecting anyone in his family IMO.Here is a plan for anyone who has ever read this quest and gotten so, so, tired of the votes to always do the hardest possible thing. Just... just take the Rambler people. The average result, do what is expected, stop trying to swing that big dick energy on everything.