HarakoniWarhawk
Striking from the Skies
- Location
- Holy Terra
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Will the RCN operate Monitors? They might not be very good at sea but they would be perfect for Canada's inland waterways.
Will the RCN operate Monitors? They might not be very good at sea but they would be perfect for Canada's inland waterways.
Another ship class perfect for Canada's inland waterways would be 'Flush-Deckers' like the Wickes and Clemson class Destroyers.Again having poor seaworthiness but again perfect for Canada.I've definitely considered that as an option, seeing as it would be cheap to procure and easy to man. Though if I decided to have some in use, they would definitely be called gun boats (albeit very heavily armed ones), but not monitors.
Actually, a destroyer isn't a good choice for inland waterways, mostly because it costs entirely too much for the role. River gunboats fill the role perfectly well for much lesser cost.Another ship class perfect for Canada's inland waterways would be 'Flush-Deckers' like the Wickes and Clemson class Destroyers.Again having poor seaworthiness but again perfect for Canada.
Actually, a destroyer isn't a good choice for inland waterways, mostly because it costs entirely too much for the role. River gunboats fill the role perfectly well for much lesser cost.
Unless, of course, Canada is purchasing rather than building such vessels. The USN would likely give them away for a song after World War I.
Another ship type I'd like to see would be some sort of well-armed sloop, like the American Erie class or French Bougainville class. Something with modest speed, armament to outgun most destroyers, and range sufficient to patrol the coastlines, all on about 2000 tons.
Would the RN C-Class Cruisers be a viable design to be used by the RCN?Actually, a destroyer isn't a good choice for inland waterways, mostly because it costs entirely too much for the role. River gunboats fill the role perfectly well for much lesser cost.
Unless, of course, Canada is purchasing rather than building such vessels. The USN would likely give them away for a song after World War I.
Another ship type I'd like to see would be some sort of well-armed sloop, like the American Erie class or French Bougainville class. Something with modest speed, armament to outgun most destroyers, and range sufficient to patrol the coastlines, all on about 2000 tons.
Would the RN C-Class Cruisers be a viable design to be used by the RCN?
It would be useful for duties beyond Canada's waters.
Pity the Erie won't be available till the 30s.
The RN certainly built enough of them, though they're kinda on the small side.Would the RN C-Class Cruisers be a viable design to be used by the RCN?
It would be useful for duties beyond Canada's waters.
Pity the Erie won't be available till the 30s.
The RN certainly built enough of them, though they're kinda on the small side.
And while the Erie class may not be available until the 1930s, all European navies built significant numbers of colonial gunboats that could be adapted to the role.
Thanks mko! I'm rather honoured myself that you're reading my TLHi!
This is a really interesting story with an "unausgelutschtes" (non-stale) topic as a starting point. Looking forward to more!
I feel honoured that my TL inspired you to take up the pen and write your own timeline!
I swear, you must be a psychic of some kind.So... on that battlecruiser... any possibility that it'll be a Lion instead of an Indefatigable?
Will Canada's future Battlecruiser be a standard Lion Class or will it be an upgraded variant like Kongou was?I swear, you must be a psychic of some kind.
In all seriousness though, I do plan on having the battlecruiser that Australia and/or Canada order being a Lion class. It's just a better match up against their German counterparts than the Indefatigable class.
To be honest, I'm still deciding upon that. While the possibility of the Canadian battlecruiser being an upgraded variant does exist, I think it's far more likely for it to just be the standard design. After all, the presumed role of such a vessel would be to defend the North American side of the Atlantic, not project power as is the case with Japan.Will Canada's future Battlecruiser be a standard Lion Class or will it be an upgraded variant like Kongou was?
I say stick with the standard Lion. A lot of people underestimate how much work goes into just altering an existing design, and how catastrophic it can be if they don't take that time.To be honest, I'm still deciding upon that. While the possibility of the Canadian battlecruiser being an upgraded variant does exist, I think it's far more likely for it to just be the standard design. After all, the presumed role of such a vessel would be to defend the North American side of the Atlantic, not project power as is the case with Japan.
Nevertheless, the Canadian and Australian battlecruisers could have some minor differences from the original design.
I say stick with the standard Lion. A lot of people underestimate how much work goes into just altering an existing design, and how catastrophic it can be if they don't take that time.
The practical consequence being that any significant alterations of the Lion design are liable to push the completion date back by a year or two.