I'd assume nations like China would go down fighting to the last man because they've been through this shit before, and it's left scars.Nations like China will go down fighting to the last man. They believe they are the future masters of mankind and the aliens will surely dismantle their brainwashing Orwellian society.
These things already barely work against first world militaries so I can't imagine an army that's centuries ahead of us would be even momentarily perturbed by these tactics.The real question is if their tech is good enough to protect them from suicide bombers, snipers, etc. Because there will be lots of people who do that, and the question becomes, can they, 'wait it out' without casualties, or do they have to take action?
Eh...depends. If they're not here to brutalize us, ruin our languages and cultures and strip us of our wealth then I think an argument could be made that resisters are just being contrarians. I mean millions would still do this but still.Imagine saying that to any colonized country. That they're only resisting because they're being contrary.
I think you are mistaken conquer yes colonizer no they are not here for resources that is stupid why would advance space society care about a planets resources when you have entire planets and others to take like mars or better yet asteroids and don't want forced their religion on earth since if you read the bio I gave to them later on the forum they don't mind other religions as long they don't hurt them, the humans, or others. I assist you read th bio I made but to simplify it the aliens have Dr. Doom mindset were they think would do better job at ruling then the humans but unlike humans don't have alternate goals and simply want betterthe life's of humans even if they have to kill some of them because to them it better fate then allowing us to almost wipe out themselves and almost destroy the planet like what happened to them. I am not saying its right but to them its right thing to do.The answer is: Of course not. Not even if they think they have the best of intention. That's just the nature of the relation between colonizer and colonized.
This is why there will be resistance to a truly benevolent alien invasion... but its also why an alien invasion along the terms described would be unlikely to benevolent in the first place. Unless they were to entrust us with their technology and infrastructure, their monopoly on force would be unmatched by that possessed by any terrestrial nation, for whom there is at least some hope of resistance, reform, or revolution.Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been
The relation between colonizer/colonized is always about resource extraction or assimilation or extermination. There's never been such a thing as a benevolent colonizer in history, so the usual parallels don't necessarily apply.The answer is: Of course not. Not even if they think they have the best of intention. That's just the nature of the relation between colonizer and colonized.
Not sure this will work, first scanning something requires interacting with it this is the cause of us being unable to know both postion and speed, bouncing off light does not have a effect on large masses but huge one on subatomic particle. barring magic a scan detail enough to map the planet on the atomic level perfectly would inject a lot of energy in the system, also a perfect map of people brain would be a living thing, a perfect simulation of a living being would be a living being giving this approach massive ethical issues..
Here's what I think happens. Earth is basically a closed system. Anything that happens inside it is essentially predestined unless outside elements are introduced (Aliens, meteors). With advanced scanning systems they could map earth down to the atomic level and use their computers to create a simulation one decade into the future. They will know not only what people are thinking in their own heads but everything they could possibly do under any circumstance.
.
This would be much harder to break. I remember that this was also a tactic that colonizing countries used, Selling/ Gifting weapons to more desperate groups in order to get those groups to overthrow local tyrants and trade the proceeds (slaves) with their new allies.How about we turn this one around? Let's ignore for a moment the conditions of the opening post; let's say the aliens, after studying Earth, realize that threatening military action would not work for their purpose, and instead decide to take an economic approach.
Thus, they introduce themselves as visitors, proving their FTL capabilities in some manner that at least scientists would be able to confirm works (past experience has proven that facts aren't enough to persuade politicians not to deny scientific proof), and then, immediately proceed to start uplifting the least developed nations on earth; it's not even necessary that they give up any of their own technology, they can just buy technology that already exists in Earth's first world nations and distribute it freely to the poor nations. We already know that this is technically possible right now, it's just that those with power would oppose it, but since those people are willing to let climate change exacerbate for profit, I can't imagine that they'd refuse to make a profit, especially if the aliens are coy about what they're buying the technology for.
Then, in the span of a couple decades at most, a majority of the poorest nations are sporting things like a completely independent energy grid from solar/other renewable energy plants, have access to enough food, and since most of this work is done by the aliens, Earth's imperialist powers can't just sabotage the regimes or cause revolution, when the regimes the alien wants will have a new, much stronger superpower (the aliens) to back them up. As long as the aliens are genuinely helpful to the poor nations and truly raise standards of living there, it won't be long before a majority of the Earth is a genuine alien protectorate, at which point, what would the richest nation be able to do if the alien started making demands of them? I find like this would make for a more interesting scenario - the aliens are still "benevolent" to an extent, in that they're helping humans, but they're only helping some humans, and with the ultimate intent to slowly build up a reputation for being benevolent, while using human's factionalism against them.
Also, I imagine the aliens would make it very clear that any harm to their envoys, even accidental, would be met with severe retaliation - assassinating an alien ambassador, or bombing a marriage that an alien ambassador was attending, could be considered acts of war, and with orbital surveillance, trying to trick the aliens would be a pretty difficult proposition.
Is there anything that Earth could do to avoid assimilation in such a scenario? And, as is the spirit of the OP post, how many people would actually be willing to provoke the aliens, when they're doing nothing openly hostile (such as threatening bombardments) while still savagely taking apart the advantages that most of the modern exploitation economy uses to prop itself up? How many would actually help and work with them?
Because, the way I see it, a species with access to FTL travel should be smart enough to be able to spot the obvious weaknesses the current system has (since we on Earth can do it already) and use them to tear it down without ever firing a shot. And how the world would deal with that seems like a much more interesting question than merely facing off against a better armed thug.
Imagine saying that to any colonized country. That they're only resisting because they're being contrary.
I'd assume nations like China would go down fighting to the last man because they've been through this shit before, and it's left scars.
A couple thousand years of Chinese history suggests that China will definitely not fight to the last man.
This. My reaction to the OP's description of these aliens is it sounds like an imperialist state's propaganda and self-flattering self-conception. Basically no conquerors ever actually resembled these aliens, but lots of conquerors claimed and imagined that they were kind of like these aliens. They sound like the British Empire as imagined by a guy who's nostalgic for it and thinks it was great and thinks it's a tragedy that it collapsed. They sound like American global hegemony as imagined by a George W. Bush type neoconservative. They sound like the future world order imagined by some rich white guy in 1905 who read The White Man's Burden as an unironic pro-imperialist stirring call to action. They sound like the Chinese civilization-state as imagined by a Confucian scholar-official who served the Yongle Emperor.I feel that countries that have had a colonial history (on both sides) will look at these newcomers with great suspicion.
"Haven't we seen this before? When will the other shoe drop?"
No; in fact it's logically contradictory since orbital bombardments are "brutal".They say they're not here to brutalize us. Can we trust them when they say that? What if they say it while also threatening orbital bombardments?
What of the different, economic approach I proposed? Would that require totalitarian levels of social control as well?If they intend to reshape human society they'll need totalitarian levels of social control and surveillance. For generations at the least, becuse that's how long it takes to totally crush a culture out of existence short of genocide of the population.
No, both because it's less "controlling" in the first place and relies on something other than naked force to enforce cooperation.What of the different, economic approach I proposed? Would that require totalitarian levels of social control as well?