"League of Nations"
I haven't given too much thought to it. I see innovation as a process in most cases - even if we put the lable on it at one certain point. Just taking the post from yesterday OTL Fleming "invented" penicillin, but the use of the fungus was documented before that. It was brought to a usable form by a team. Or the mentioned Sulfa. OTL IG Farben/Bayer released it in it's more complex form, while already having produced the active component for over 20 years, not knowing it's medical use. Here I used it to get around patents, that were about to expire anyway. Might also have butterflied the US Sulfa craze away, delaying the FDA if I read Wikipedia right - but that's not my usual sandbox so someone else might weight in?I see, I see, yes, this is good. I have to wonder though will the there be more changes in tech advancement maybe some countries will invent stuff they wouldn't have done?
One of the things that will soon be "invented" outside of Austria will be the armoured personal carrier. It will be people looking at the advantage Austria had in the fighting here, and building on it.
AH is niche on SV. I'd also probably have more readers if I went with something else but the niche again "Austria" in the title. Say "Creating a Danube Federation" (well, if I ever get that far, only kinda wrong) or "Vielvölkerkerker Mk II" (Oh, there will be the caricatures, and the odd nationalist with a grievance, but it was somewhat exaggerated OTL, and would be more so when it comes to the "Mk II").I also don't understand why more people are not getting involved with this story. It is actually quite interesting.
Anyway, on with the programming:
Furlan, Martin (1954): The Austro-Italian War and the Wider World, Triest: University Press
League of Nations
Having grown out of the Paris Peace Treaties, the League of Nations was often considered something of an Entente power club. Additionally events like the Corfu Incident strengthened the view, that is was there to extend the power of the big countries within it.
While it was laid down in the founding treaties, that attacks on a League member should be militarily answered by all members, with the already known League inefficiencies nobody expected any big decisions to be taken before the Assembly meeting in September. So it was something of a surprise, when the League Council was quick to condemn Italian aggression against Austria by the 16th of April. Thirteen of the fourteen members voted for the resolution, with Italy forced to abstain as it was involved in the conflict.
While there were accusations of bribery, this theory nowadays is contained to Italian revanchist and neo-fascist circles. This theory was mainly based on the fact that the 11th, the day Mussolini was shot, the Austrian Consulate in Geneva had held a dinner party for the League Council representatives of France, Britain, Japan and Canada. This had been a long-standing tradition, since the negotiations in 1922 Austria attempted to keep up good relations with the representatives, even if relations were strained with their home governments.
It was far more that the media storm that was orchestrated by Austria aided them. There were graphic pictures of Matrei on the cover of most papers, the small damage to Innsbruck by artillery fire was widely reported on, even if exaggerated by clever angles on the photographs, as well as pictures of Italian troops non too gently occupying Lienz. The near unprecedented Austrian Army provided to journalists, going as far as embedding foreign reporters within combat troops, as well as carefully selected pictures and film distributed for free world wide, dominated the perception of the war in the international press. A counter narrative was presented in Italian papers as well as a small amount of international ones that were sympathetic to the fascist ideas, but especially in those confused first days before Italo Balbo took over Italian leadership, even those narratives were very diluted.
It was Romania, under pressure of it's fellows of the lose coalition called the 'Little Entente', that brought further sanctions to the table. The initial idea was a full embargo on Italy, but this was whittled down over two weeks of negotiations to a simple embargo an arms and ammunition sold to Italy. Noteworthy according to the protocols an extension of those embargoes to Austria wasn't considered, despite their successful counter offensive they were still considered the victim.
While this embargo didn't significantly affect Italian war making ability, them having a domestic industry and robust stockpiles, it prevent a crash conscription program similar to the one Austria was undertaking.
When it became clear that the Italian leadership in Rome intended to continue fighting this war to the end, despite repeated calls for negotiations not just from the League, and several military setbacks, by mid May calls for a naval blockade and an embargo over a larger list of war making and war supporting cargo were growing louder. After the Italian representative finally stormed out in anger, a resolution for this was decided on on the 21th, with several nations agreeing to provide ships for this endeavour. While the French and British provided the largest contribution, other nations chipped in. These were Germany, Portugal, Spain, Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey. Albania offered to participate, but would require some ships, as their two German surplus minelayers had just been decommissioned, and their new ships were still under construction in Venice.
While there were several letters of complain, mainly from US merchantmen, the blockade proved to be reasonably effective at preventing arms from reaching Italy, even with the obvious problems. The Yugoslav Royal Navy, having nothing heavier than a light cruiser in service, mostly stayed in their ports, as Italian battleships regularly steamed out of Taranto up and down the Adriatic to provide coastal bombardment. Still under the mandate their lighter units were used to crack down on their domestic smugglers and to harass ships leaving Albanian ports.
Similar difficult was the situation in the Aegean Sea. Here several shooting incidents happened between the Greek and Turkish Navy in the waters around the Dodecanese islands, the most famous probably the exchange of fire between the Greek battleship Lemnos and the Turkish battlecruiser Yavuz Sultan Selim south of Kasos. While both ships retreated with only minor splinter damage, over the course of the two month embargo Greece claimed two submarines and a torpedo boat lost, while Turkey lost one destroyer.
These events shifted discussions towards the post war world, Italy already being carved up by bystander nations while the fighting was still ongoing on the ground. Concrete territorial concessions were of course only discussed in back rooms, but the rumours were, that only Britain and France would receive anything but scraps. With a chance of concrete spoils on the horizon, by mid June France and Yugoslavia shifted from a partial defensive mobilisation to a more general one, intending to bring the Italian leadership to the negotiation table by force.
With the second to last post out of chronological order anyway, and the last post actually spanning up to 1942, I decided that the spoilers in this can be allowed.