The collective are the Incubators' species. Thinkers are a typical example of sapients evolving to throw away emotions, "granting the species the capacity to explicitly reason about its needs and wants" (pref-specs). The exception are the humans, who keep their emotions despite their sapience, making magic possible.Who are "the collective" and who are "the exception", the Incubators or those who found/created them for the former; humans, Thinkers or Incubators for the latter? And more importantly what is "the exception"?
The passage suggests "the collective" is looking for the exception to this. Is "the exception" never making the connection? Or is it coming to "the capacity to explicitly reason about its needs and wants" without making the connection? The latter feels more radical and more likely to be something worth seeking.
With that in mind, humans seem to be a "typical" example of developing the neural connection between fundamental needs and higher-level objectives, and Thinkers too. That leads me to think we're looking at the species that found the Incubators and put them to use. The Incubators certainly seem to be a species that developed higher-level thinking without integrating their emotional thought routines.
OTOH, if integrating emotions into higher-level thinking is so common to life, why did the Incubators find only humans to have emotions?
They're talking about the heat death of the universe, and the necessity of magic in combating it.Noninterference was the highest of values, save for only one: survival. And survival was now in question.
It was writing to her mind.
Last edited: