What could possibly go wrong?
User | Total |
---|---|
King Washington | 1 |
[Just to clarify this is purely a hypothetical, I don't support this blatant act of imperialism.]
By act of ASB/ROB, immediately after Japan's unconditional surrender the plans of the United States government shifts towards outright annexation, with Japan being cut up into american territories with plans for them to be directly brought in as states at some distant point in the future. This is generally supported by the american public (again, ROB/ASBs are involved). The entire imperial family gets exiled to some isolated part of Alaska and barred from returning to Japan ever again.
The mind control of the American government lasts until the mid-80s (or if the United States itself somehow collapses).
So realistically does this just turned into some sort of american version of French Algeria with all that entails? How does the inevitable attempts to "americanized" them effect to japanese as a culture? How bloody and widespread is the inevitable resistance to the occupation likely to be?
How does this likely effect internal american politics and the wider Cold War?
Yes they still let the Philippines go.Does the US abandon the Phillipines too? It would seem pretty strange for them to abandon it while also annexing Japan.
America basically instantly loses any credibility it has as a force for liberation in Asia as well as any hope of a quiet occupation.
Also giving the vote to 70+ million Japanese people would cause very funni things to American race relations and would basically destroy the current American party system.
There are many, many logistical issues with this scenario.
Distance is the biggest one.
Cultural integration is another wasp's nest entirely, as Japanese resentment will be a great deal more prevalent than original time frame.
I've read various threads on this in the past and generally, Japan is better off as its own country in the end.
Not to rain on the idea, but.... Yeah... It is far fetched.
You guys realize I posted this in Weird History for a reason, right? Literally what is the point of bringing up the scenario being impossible under normal circumstances given I specifically invoked an act of ASB/ROB?The only way it's remotely plausible is if no nukes are dropped and Operation Downfall is rightly seen as idiotic and a waste of lives, and instead Operation Starvation continues indefinitely until Japan finally surrenders after losing an enormous percentage of its total population and is in total political and social chaos.
Annexing a fully functional and united Japan just doesn't make sense for the US.
The only path for THAT would be if the US just kept the Philippines and also annexed japan, and just said, 'We imperialism now!'.
The US in that case would probably steal most of the colonies from the other collapsing Empires going forward.
Agree with much of this except the sino soviet split part as from my understanding of the history politics etc involved the increased focus and overbearing nature of a shift to asia on the soviets part would actually accelerate the Sino soviet split but would be much more mild in less China warms up to America and more China goes the way of yugoslavia and tells to soviets to fuck off, likely sticking harder to Maoism after his eventually death.America basically instantly loses any credibility it has as a force for liberation in Asia as well as any hope of a quiet occupation.
Also giving the vote to 70+ million Japanese people would cause very funni things to American race relations and would basically destroy the current American party system.
The UK and France are considerably more likely to take this as a carte blanche to do whatever they want to hold onto their own Empires and tell America to piss off if they try to interfere. Potentially to the point of outright fissioning as London recategorises America as simply the next would be usurper; especially if America doesn't let the UK have any of the spoils.
The Soviets are alarmed by this inexplicable act of imperialism and likely put greater priority on Asia while also butterflying the Sino-Soviet split (also as America will be too busy with the worst insurgency it has ever dealt with America's unlikely to get involved in Korea).
I don't think there would be a South Korea, the North would just annex the South and America would be too busy trying to contain the eternal insurgency in Japan and would be too distrusted by Asia to bother intervening in the Korean peninsula. Which makes Korea completely unrecognisable as the Kim family only became so predominant in North Korean politics due to the Korean war basically wiping out all possible opposition; leading to Korea being a likely much more boring country. Though likely a major power as Chinese and Soviet investment and trade into it would be extensive as a counterbalance to American Japan and the two koreas joined together have a great deal of resources, educated personnel, and a merger of the great industrial base of the North and the Agricultural heartland of the south.Agree with much of this except the sino soviet split part as from my understanding of the history politics etc involved the increased focus and overbearing nature of a shift to asia on the soviets part would actually accelerate the Sino soviet split but would be much more mild in less China warms up to America and more China goes the way of yugoslavia and tells to soviets to fuck off, likely sticking harder to Maoism after his eventually death.
Ironically this results in a stronger North Korea who would 100% play both the CCP and Soviets off each other for further aid, economic deals, alongside extra military supplies and expertise which will cause wacky things in South Korea as North Korea had a better economy up into the mid 70s and all this extra effort from Russia and China could prolong that and help properly industrialize and modernize North Korea at least until after the Soviets Collapse as I can see Korea easily start to fall behind afterwards but would easily have the potential to lack the whole famines problem as much of that is from a lack of modern agricultural machinery., with simular problems in their mining industry which is reliant on literal pickaxes.
Quite population I also think would continue as long as it went down the path I mentioned earlier with a "extended occupation" etc
I don't think there would be a South Korea, the North would just annex the South and America would be too busy trying to contain the eternal insurgency in Japan and would be too distrusted by Asia to bother intervening in the Korean peninsula. Which makes Korea completely unrecognisable as the Kim family only became so predominant in North Korean politics due to the Korean war basically wiping out all possible opposition; leading to Korea being a likely much more boring country. Though likely a major power as Chinese and Soviet investment and trade into it would be extensive as a counterbalance to American Japan and the two koreas joined together have a great deal of resources, educated personnel, and a merger of the great industrial base of the North and the Agricultural heartland of the south.
The complete collapse of trust in America would also likely lead to America having very little soft power in the rest of Asia. Everyone from India to Indonesia would be more trusting of the Soviets to finance decolonisation efforts against Western Europe which would likely further entrench itself to try and hold onto its colonies since if America is allowed to conquer whatever it likes; they have no reason to complain when European countries commit war crimes to hold onto their most lucrative colonies.
The collapse of the Warsaw Pact was down to very specific circumstances rather particular to the exact sequence of events that played out in the 80s OTL. It's by no means inevitable and with America likely being left something of a pariah state with no trust or confidence by the global South and being stuck in a brutal quagmire of trying to forcibly Americanise a country with half as many people as itself to make them not merely American aligned but outright American subjects would leave America in a more precarious spot.
This is literally the worst possible scenario for getting peace in post-war Japan. An imperial annexation of the country wins the support of virtually nobody in the country and makes an enemy of more or less the entire nation.
im Pretty sure that the immigration thing is the unstated backstory to big hero 6. unless it takes place in the high castle timeline that is hahahaArguably something that might work better is garter, and earlier Japanese immigration to the US. Like 19th century Irish levels of immigration.
You would arguably get a similar cultural effect, just mines the insane imperialism. Really that does like a more interesting story. And depending on the time could lead to a funny joke about Civil Wars. "Who side was your family you on?" "In which civil war?"
Never thought about that, but that could be a logical explanation. Really My only question is what could have pushed some many people to A: cross the Pacific ocean, and B: skip Hawaii. Because historically that's were they would go...im Pretty sure that the immigration thing is the unstated backstory to big hero 6. unless it takes place in the high castle timeline that is hahaha
Something like a major crop failure in Asia and the National Origin act(bans immigration from Asia) failing to pass could do itNever thought about that, but that could be a logical explanation. Really My only question is what could have pushed some many people to A: cross the Pacific ocean, and B: skip Hawaii. Because historically that's were they would go...
Actually doing a bit of wiki reading historically Japanese people made up a large minority of the population of the Hawaiian Islands.
So yeah you would just need a reason why the immigrant population was bigger, and why they contained to the continent.
That still a big stretch. More plausible by a long shot, but still a big stretch. It would be a major black eye for the US. The country being so heartless that they would only help a broken people when they more or less ask to be conquered. You also still have the other problem of the US's allies taking this as a go ahead to hold onto their colonial holdings.And that's when politics rears its ugly head.
Some America First/McCarthyist politician gets wind of the relief plans and starts raising a stink. He, and other like-minded politicians, begin to demand an accounting of why all these resources are being set aside for non-Americans, as well as demanding that the de-occupation continues as scheduled.
And unfortunately, these politicians begin to gain momentum and support.
In a private meeting with the Japanese Emperor, the American ambassador explains what's happening in Congress. When asked why they would rescind the aid offered for the earthquake recovery, the ambassador replies: "As ugly as it is, you guys just aren't Americans."
The Emperor gets an idea. He summons the leaders of the Diet, commanding them to petition to become a Territory of the United States, and thus become Americans. The Diet complies, because even the most ultranationalist among them isn't about to tell the Emperor "no."
And in 1952, Japan successfully petitions the US Congress to become a territory of the United States of America.
The rest, as they say, is history.
Ah, I unfortunately left a bit unclear (I shall fix it when I get home). In my scenario, the anti-aid politicians were gaining ground and it looked like they might succeed, which was what the meeting with the Emperor was about. The Emperor then decided to preempt/sidestep the anti-aid politicians by taking away their biggest weapon (that the Japanese weren't American, and thus didn't deserve so much help).That still a big stretch. More plausible by a long shot, but still a big stretch. It would be a major black eye for the US. The country being so heartless that they would only help a broken people when they more or less ask to be conquered.
Well, yes, but also no. The colonial powers might see it as Carte Blanche to keep their holdings, but the process of decolonization had already begun. Britaon had already given Canada, Australia, and New Zealand independence in the 1920s, and India and Pakistan followed in 1947 (5 years before my hypothetical 2nd Great Kanto Earthquake). The French were also seeing a lot of revolts in their colonies from the 1870s - 1960s, so the end of French colonialism is going to happen eventually whether the French want it to or not.You also still have the other problem of the US's allies taking this as a go ahead to hold onto their colonial holdings
Canada was a dominion till 47 and did stop using it in it bureaucracy until 1987. New Zealand was also declared defacto independent in 47 but that was more uk changing laws meaning no Independence Day. the partition of India happened more because of the quit India movement and the more armed insurgencies and the British and French lacking the manpower to enforce there empiresAh, I unfortunately left a bit unclear (I shall fix it when I get home). In my scenario, the anti-aid politicians were gaining ground and it looked like they might succeed, which was what the meeting with the Emperor was about. The Emperor then decided to preempt/sidestep the anti-aid politicians by taking away their biggest weapon (that the Japanese weren't American, and thus didn't deserve so much help).
Well, yes, but also no. The colonial powers might see it as Carte Blanche to keep their holdings, but the process of decolonization had already begun. Britaon had already given Canada, Australia, and New Zealand independence in the 1920s, and India and Pakistan followed in 1947 (5 years before my hypothetical 2nd Great Kanto Earthquake). The French were also seeing a lot of revolts in their colonies from the 1870s - 1960s, so the end of French colonialism is going to happen eventually whether the French want it to or not.
No I got what you ment just fine. My point being what would compel the anti aid faction to agree with annexing Japan?Ah, I unfortunately left a bit unclear (I shall fix it when I get home). In my scenario, the anti-aid politicians were gaining ground and it looked like they might succeed, which was what the meeting with the Emperor was about. The Emperor then decided to preempt/sidestep the anti-aid politicians by taking away their biggest weapon (that the Japanese weren't American, and thus didn't deserve so much help).