The Laurent's Grad School Experience

Remember that time that Henry Ford was called a class traitor by the Wall Street Journal for offering a $5 a day wage for eight hours of work?

To be fair, adjusting for buying power, 5 dollars a day is absurd.

Inflation wise, it's only 126 dollars a day, so basically our current 15/hr minimum wage suggestion. Still very solid, of course. But back then a house cost around 4000 dollars or something, conservatively, and so you could save up for a house in 800 days of work if you had no expenses.

Meanwhile, current median housing is 200,000, and so at 126 dollars a day you'd need 1587 days of work, rough ish. It'd be like if Amazon leap frogged the 15 minimum wage and tried for 30, or something? Which I think would get angry editorials, honestly, for forcing other companies to match wages or so on.
 
Boethius wrote "The Consolation of Philosophy" while imprisoned, and soon enough to die.

Looking around at the modern world, I find no such consolation in history, not in knowing how many of these mistakes have been made so often before, not even in knowing how people fought and struggled against these mistakes, against these bigotries and hatreds.

It doesn't console one, not even as cold comfort.
 
My current general idea is something about the urbanization/adaption/etc process of rural women in the 1920s and 30s, focusing especially on cultural and social processes.

And, since that's where I am, probably Kansas City specifically?
 
It can sometimes be hard to tell what to think of a source. For the Women and Children in the Medieval World class, I read a chunk of a spiritual biography of an Upper-Rhine Noble Woman, Gertrude Rickeldey.

Now, her story is that she was the child of a second wife, sickly in her young age, whose father died when she was 7 weeks old, and whose mother was driven out of the house by her own stepchildren, leaving her to be raised rather badly, get sick several times, and generally be ill-treated, before she wound up a few things.

First, tall. Like, they emphasize that she's very tall three or four times in the space of two pages. Apparently this was important.

Second, she was married to a man she didn't like, a Knight, for four years. She had four children, three of whom we know we died--and the narrator treats them as burdens that would mar the spiritual life she wanted to leave. The husband died, and she almost couldn't hold back laughs of joy... so, great marriage it was not. She sent the one remaining child, if I'm reading it right, to be raised/live with someone else, and at this time met Lady Heilke, who seemed to be a few years younger. She was running from a marriage she didn't want, and this "young lady's mother had been Gertrude's relative and good friend." So she fled to Gertrude's manor, and her reputation, her inheritance/etc gave her somewhere to live. "Thus our Lord, who does not forsake his own but cares for them amiably, also took care of this lady and this young lady together. For each one needed the other as you will hear." For a year, this young lady wore worldly garb so that she wouldn't be disinherited, and meanwhile Gertrude's last babe died and... well, she apparently didn't mourn that much, which, uh, okay.

So, all... impediments aside, these two women lived together in a household for thirty years, until Gertrude died: "But when the time tthat our Lord had provided for this lady to be on earth was accomplished, and he took her to himself, the young lady felt the greatest pain that she had ever experienced or would ever experience: to be deprived of her saintly companionship, no longer to serve her, as she had served her while she was alive, both in sickness and in health [!!!] whenever she was needed, for which she had always been ready and willing." She apparently spent thirty years of her life tending to this sick aesthetic, whose religious fervor often drove her closer to death, but who was pulled back by her Lady Heilke, who didn't marry, ever.

"This is why our Lord had provided for this lady and this young lady to be brought together, and also so that the young lady would enjoy everything together with her eternally and be with her in eternal bliss, which the faithful god may grant them." And so they "lived a happy and blessed life together."

So the young lady cared for Gertrude, saw to her every need, cherished, on some cases, Gertrude's laughter "This laughter, in particular, was so lovely and delightful, so very intimate and tender that Heilke gained a special pleasure." So too was it with her singing, which "was so good and so sweet, because she had by nature a very sweet voice...but no one heard it except for Heilke who was with her at all times." And is the one who told about it. Told this narrator, who is noted to be a woman who was somewhat close to them, about how sweet her singing was. "And to her it was a pleasure above everything to happily listen to her, it was so pleasant to listen to her voice and watch her gestures."

So, like.

It strikes me as intensely queer, and yet the one review of the translation of this document doesn't really mention it, or even the apparent pleasure that Heilke gained from tending to her (instead deeming it thankless, and certainly it was a lot of work.) And note, this is someone reviewing in 2018, so am I reading way too much into it, because, like.
 
Oh, and I have a Master's Thesis topic now. Sorry for the radio silence, might post some old essays I forgot to post here at some point. Also doing some new reviews of books for class.
 
Review--Eden On The Charles
Eden On The Charles: A Review


When Winthrop spoke of a "city upon a hill" he couldn't have known just how many historians would invoke his words in the centuries to come. Michael Rawson's environmental and cultural history of Boston, a city he uses as both trailblazer and representative of 19th century trends, draws upon these words to characterize how Boston saw itself. HIs work is not an attempt to create an entire vision of how Boston interacted with its environment and nature, but instead an attempt to create a revisioning of how cities are examined by both environmental and cultural historians.

Rawson examines Boston in a series of essays on the enclosure of the Boston Commons, the fight over public water, the rise of suburbs, the disagreements over harbor management, and the rise of a different sort of public park. In each case he notes the ways that the debate was shaped by the ecosystem of Boston, but also the ways that ideas--such as an ultimately flawed theory on how harbors worked--could radically reshape the natural environment. Rawson views land not as inert and inherent, but instead acting upon people, and acted upon by their perceptions of the world. He eschews a discussion of Boston's industrialization specifically because Boston industrializes a "generation" after Lowell, and thus does not "directly experience the formation" of that city-nature relationship (xi). His impressionistic examination of topics, using numerous cultural public and private sources, as well as government records, is largely successful, and includes surprising revelations about the origins of parks, the battles over harbors, and how the rich and powerful of Boston stopped cattle-grazing in its Commons.

While the history itself is fascinating, the most novel part of the monograph is its methodological approach. Rawson successfully combines the disparate channels in the harbor of urban history--economic, environmental, and cultural interpretations of the city--into one cohesive historical ecosystem. He argues that they can more fully explain the urban history of Boston, and potentially other areas, then if they are kept carefully separated. Rawson posits cities not as the antithesis of nature, but as having strong ties to it. Using this methodology, Rawson recontextualizes evidence that could have been made to fit either individual paradigm, but fits his schema better. Rawson's methods deserve replication in other environments to see how it explains other contexts.

However, Rawson's monograph is necessarily limited in ways he acknowledges, but which call for further study. His use of specific examples creates an impression of completeness, but not its reality. Rawson acknowledges this, and there is no fault in carefully creating the best monograph possible. But in ignoring the industrialization of Boston, he acts contrary to his own principles. Everything in his monograph was connected to everything else, and just because the specific element of industrialization wasn't original to Boston doesn't mean that its effects might not be surprising or influence some of his other topics. This represents a missed connection in an otherwise excellent work.

Rawson has achieved something extraordinary in both methodology and content. His work is engaging and deserves attention and elaboration on. It is readable at all levels, but I'd most recommend it to urban historians, environmental historians, and cultural historians in general.

*******

Afterwords (on reflection): I will say that I don't completely stand by this review. I missed the obvious fact that he kinda didn't talk about race at all, per se, which seems significant.
 
My soul just left my body.

I wrote a 3k word paper on some scholarly views on the Enlightenment, managing to finish it twelve days early, and then wanted to ask my Professor for help making one tricky citation (so I guess I wasn't done, but).

Only to learn.

That.

The Paper was cancelled, as of a few hours ago.
 
At least you can show your teachers that you went above and beyond in effort - maybe you can get some feedback for next time?

I hope it's not insensitive to ask, but can we perhaps see the paper? It's always a treat to read your work.
 
At least you can show your teachers that you went above and beyond in effort - maybe you can get some feedback for next time?

I hope it's not insensitive to ask, but can we perhaps see the paper? It's always a treat to read your work.

Also, sure, why not?

It's rough and incomplete, but.

docs.google.com

World Essay #3: The Enlightenment

World Historiography Essay #3: The Enlightenment Jeremiah Laurent Even the name given to it seems to ring with hallowed meaning. The Enlightenment, that movement and period of time seemingly bounded, in traditional historiography, in the 18th century, has been a subject of much historical debate...
 
Also, sure, why not?

It's rough and incomplete, but.

docs.google.com

World Essay #3: The Enlightenment

World Historiography Essay #3: The Enlightenment Jeremiah Laurent Even the name given to it seems to ring with hallowed meaning. The Enlightenment, that movement and period of time seemingly bounded, in traditional historiography, in the 18th century, has been a subject of much historical debate...

Thanks so much! I'll be sure to read it when I get home!
 
Back
Top