Ugh.
Those things were probably made when the mundane technology was cutting edge stuff.So that's once again an unwillingness to innovate and progress.
That's actually my favorite interpretation. It interferes with technology that arced, and non arcing/modern transistors are so new by the time of canon that nobody has tested them yet.Why no modern electronic's???
Anti-lightning wards.
They just work too good.
On thing often forgotten is that Harry Potter was written with the first year taking place over 30 years ago now.That's actually my favorite interpretation. It interferes with technology that arced, and non arcing/modern transistors are so new by the time of canon that nobody has tested them yet.
First HP book is in 1991 when H goes to their first school year.The world of Harry Potter starts the literal year the internet was made public
The "internet" came became public in '91 but I did mention that the first real web browser didn't come into being until '93. Hence why I had in the following sentence said most people wouldn't be aware of it unless they were big into tech news.First HP book is in 1991 when H goes to their first school year.
The World Wide Web became available to the broader public on April 30, 1993.
January 1, 1983 is considered the official birthday of the Internet. Prior to this, the various computer networks did not have a standard way to communicate with each other.
The magical interference largely came as fanon from the early-mid Aughts when the movies were coming out and many newer and thus younger fans at the time forgot how much technology had advanced since the early 90's. Many people in modern times can be forgiven for forgetting that we never see the Wizarding World make it past the year 1999 save for the snippet of the epilogue, the dotcom crash hadn't happened yet and the internet still arrived at your home in CD's from AOL.My headcanon is that there is no interference between magic and technology. I don't remember there being an example in canon to prove it, only rumors. As far as I am concerned the whole thing is caused by Dumbledore not wanting students to listen to normal people's radio, thus maintaining the cultural rift between the magical and mundane societies.
To discover that would require exactly the kind of experimentation that the magical community tries its best to prevent.
Many people in modern times can be forgiven for forgetting that we never see the Wizarding World make it past the year 1999 save for the snippet of the epilogue, the dotcom crash hadn't happened yet and the internet still arrived at your home in CD's from AOL.
I've been re-reading, and not seeing (or maybe no longer seeing) the "only a little bit" part. McGonagall is a hypocrite, too: what Hazel can do McGonagall calls "parlour tricks", yet what are mouse to snuffbox, beetle to button, and hedgehog to pincushion transformations if not parlor tricks? (Match to needle is marginally useful.) They may be stepping stones to something useful, but Hazel's spells are actually useful (all being created out of necessity).Also, good job making McGonagall incredibly cruel and unlikable from Liz's perspective, but only a little bit proud and close-minded from everyone else's.
Dumbledore wanting to maintain that rift, to that extent? Huh. You and I appear to have interestingly different impressions of the character of Baseline Standard Dumbledore (that is, the sort of Dumbledore we assume a given universe has until/unless more information on the local Dumbledore is available).coalcat said:As far as I am concerned the whole thing is caused by Dumbledore not wanting students to listen to normal people's radio, thus maintaining the cultural rift between the magical and mundane societies.
It has less to do with Dumbledore and more to do with the general culture of wizards.Dumbledore wanting to maintain that rift, to that extent? Huh. You and I appear to have interestingly different impressions of the character of Baseline Standard Dumbledore (that is, the sort of Dumbledore we assume a given universe has until/unless more information on the local Dumbledore is available).
Ah, and Dumbledore is just the locally in charge wizard and at least willing to go along with that for the time being?coalcat said:It has less to do with Dumbledore and more to do with the general culture of wizards.
Right.The separation between the wizards and the muggles is not just a consequence of the Statute of Secrecy. It's its goal.
That's an interesting hypothesis and one I don't think I'd pondered before, so thanks, but pondering it now, I don't think it holds up. There were thousands of years of history before the Statute of Secrecy went into effect. Some cultures in some places and times may still have enforced some degree of barrier preventing reproduction, but not all, surely, and even without considering the possibility of having magical descendants, a wix would be an attractive partner for their own magical abilities. If magical ability could be spread throughout a population like that, it seems almost certain that it would have in at least one culture, probably more than one, and that culture would then have had a considerable advantage in competition with cultures that prevented such reproduction.The separation between the wizards and the muggles is not just a consequence of the Statute of Secrecy. It's its goal.
Assuming the wizards and witches practiced the normal level of exogamy and had the normal number of children, it wouldn't take more that a few generations before magic is no longer special rare thing, but rather common in the human population. And that doesn't take into account the effect of magical healing on child mortality.
What I am trying to say is that without artificial separation, the magical community would have been assimilated into mainstream society long ago.
Ehh. Even beyond the above, though, I think I disagree here -- at least, treating "mobs of peasants with torches and pitchforks" as representative rather than strictly literal.That and not mobs of peasants with torches and pitchforks have alway been the main threat to the wizards' way of life.
It honestly seems unlikely to be a purely genetic factor, but still displays things at least resembling heredity.If magical ability could be spread throughout a population like that, it seems almost certain that it would have in at least one culture, probably more than one, and that culture would then have had a considerable advantage in competition with cultures that prevented such reproduction.
Aye; both it being purely genetic and it having nothing to do with heredity seem extremely unlikely, based on what we observe.IllegibleScream said:It honestly seems unlikely to be a purely genetic factor, but still displays things at least resembling heredity.
I'm not sure just what the canon on squibs is either, sorry.It might be fanon, but don't Squibs have enough magic to brew potions and craft things, while Muggles do not?
Why, in this context?
I believe at least some stories use that sort of thing, yeah.Edit: I forgot one idea that works with a more genetic basis. Squibs getting ejected or adopted out of magical society, introducing magical factors to muggles, which creates Muggleborns a generation or two down, or when two different lines of squibs intersect.
Basically if your maternal great grandfather and your paternal great grandfather just appeared in their respective orphanage's one day, you have a non-zero chance to be a Muggleborn.
I mean, they are, there's only like 6 confirmed muggleborns in Harry's year vs 12+ confirmed pure/half bloods (and several may not actually be muggleborn given they are 11 after a civil war where rape was a distinct plausibility from Deatheaters and a non-insignificant proportion of the magical population doesn't see "muggles" as people), and consider the much larger population of the mundane vs magicIf magic is genetic in some way, then Muggleborns should be very rare, since having the same mutation occur over and over again in unrelated people isn't something super common.
Except before the status there wouldn't be a forcing of cultural change, since wizards and non-magical were part of one culture (in the same country). There would be a natural cultural change/growth. It would be as involuntary as any other change caused by youth doing stuff differently. The real forced involuntary change was the rich wizards forcing the status on everyone else so that they could have more wealth and power.What the Statute does make more difficult is muggles attempting to force involuntary cultural changes, or other impositions, upon wix, given they now don't even know wix exist as a potential target.
Because in a lot of ways Genetics is purely the study of hereditary factors.
If that was what happened, though, why in 1689? By 1689, that sort of cultural exchange would have been going on for thousands of years; it would itself be normal. And the Statute of Secrecy had global support; even if there was enough opposition to it that there was actually a war over it or the like, the pro-Statute side was strong enough to win that war. That seems unlikely to be the case for a small minority of wix wanting to dominate the rest, when the rest wanted to not have that happen and in addition to already outnumbering the minority could also draw on muggle support. Force multipliers only go so far, especially since we also know that whatever conflict there was didn't do too much damage to be covered up.DragonWyrm said:Except before the status there wouldn't be a forcing of cultural change, since wizards and non-magical were part of one culture (in the same country). There would be a natural cultural change/growth. It would be as involuntary as any other change caused by youth doing stuff differently. The real forced involuntary change was the rich wizards forcing the status on everyone else so that they could have more wealth and power.
So what really is happening is the rich wizards forcing everyone else to think/follow their rules. Destroying thousand of years of culture and traditions. Then they cry about people trying to force them not to torture non-magical because it's their tradition and culture!
Ah, I think this might be a definition issue, yes; I'd say genetics is specifically about genes. The hereditary aspects of genes, the role of genes in reproduction, etc. are part of that, but more... emergent, I suppose it could be called? That is, genetics is about genes, genes are significant in reproduction and heredity, therefore genetics includes a significant aspect of studying hereditary factors, rather than genetics being more directly study of hereditary factors.IllegibleScream said:Because in a lot of ways Genetics is purely the study of hereditary factors.
It's like saying the study of materials, except all the ones made of matter. I'm sure you could find or manufacture an edge case that would fit the definition, but it's so hideously unnatural as to be a nearly useless avenue of research.
We run into an issue where definitions only exist for things that are conceivable, and hereditary traits completely unrelated to anything heritable are inconceivable.
Imperio and oblivate. If someone is actually smart about using it, no one would notice. Especially if they don't have a strong feeling about the subject, therefore they wouldn't try to fight the imperio with all their strength. Target the Lords that would disagree with the status, and make them vote. (That is if you don't have a hostage or blackmail already)And the Statute of Secrecy had global support; even if there was enough opposition to it that there was actually a war over it or the like, the pro-Statute side was strong enough to win that war. That seems unlikely to be the case for a small minority of wix wanting to dominate the rest, when the rest wanted to not have that happen and in addition to already outnumbering the minority could also draw on muggle support. Force multipliers only go so far, especially since we also know that whatever conflict there was didn't do too much damage to be covered up.
Imperio and oblivate. If someone is actually smart about using it, no one would notice. Especially if they don't have a strong feeling about the subject, therefore they wouldn't try to fight the imperio with all their strength. Target the Lords that would disagree with the status, and make them vote. (That is if you don't have a hostage or blackmail already)
Then you could use some Jinx that makes you feel disgust or fear when a certain subject is mentioned. If you do it for long enough, brainwashing would occur.
That is without using good old fashioned propaganda.
Send out notices that only say what those in power want to be heard. Scare the population about how evil the muggles are. They want vengeance! Didn't one of your ancestors' torture some of them? What about your youthful indiscretions?
The thing is, it makes sense to do if there was any real way to manage it. Magic in HP has no real limitations outside of like resurrection, and even that has loopholes.The Staute is stupid and contrived once you actually get down to thinking about it as it's a massive plot hole.
And it's far from certain they're actually capable of that sort of uplift/utopia creation.Bladeruler said:Wizards coming out the world can end in utopia, horrible war crimes committed on one side or the other, or the collapse of civilization. They have the ability to teleport and fly at no cost. They can mind control, shapeshift, remove memories, time travel. They either uplift humanity into a post scarcity society, get hunted down and pushed back into hiding but this time they are being hunted, or have to basically end civilization to go back into hiding.